×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
10

Remember the phrase "on the fbi's radar"? They call it radar because the FBI has an actual program called RADAR.

submitted by prototype to random 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 05:20:08 ago (+12/-2)     (random)

It was started under obama.

The program was developed ostensibly to "fill the gap in HUMINT."
The intent was to monitor or go after those who are in the process of radicalizing, or might radicalize but who haven't given the agency probable cause.

The actual intent was to find people who they could radicalize in order to manufacture consent for domestic agendas.

Now you know why you keep hearing that phrase. When the story comes out they can exploit the gap between the meaning of 'on radar' and claim that phrase merely meant someone was in the "monitoring list", rather than being a high priority that was actively kept track of. The excuse will be "they dropped the ball", as it always is.

There are now over two million americans "on the radar" in various tiers. This is what the threat matrix score was about. This is their program paralleling the NSA and DHS. Many databases are brought together, but they also employ part time and full time informants, usually ex-convicts and military veterans. Ever had a weird conversation in the grocery line about machine guns? How about a guy in a neighboring room at your motel wanting to show you his gun collection? That political group you just started suddenly has a couple guys join who want to talk about escalating? These are all hypothetical examples, but I'm sure more than a few people can relate.

Thats RADAR. And you, like millions of other American citizens, are on it.

Some details may have been altered or changed in order to preserve the anonymity of the source.

Posted courtesy of:

A whistleblower I may or may not have met recently.



9 comments block


[ - ] x0x7 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 07:26:01 ago (+1/-0)

I can't find anything on it. I'm actually going to legit call bullshit unless you can actually come up with something.

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 3 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 09:14:51 ago (+3/-0)

I understand wanting a source, but at the same time...isn't obvious at this point? Do you really think they wouldn't do this if they have the capabillity? Which they obviously do.

[ - ] thoughtcryme 2 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 10:04:01 ago (+2/-0)

This is how they think too. You can't be "nice" and expect to survive. They aren't nice either.

If my enemy can and benefits, then my enemy does it. period.
We dont need a source, we need independent confirmations and verification.

and trustworthy people to discuss them with.

[ - ] prototype [op] 2 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 08:13:48 ago (+2/-0)

"I can't find anything on it."

That is because this is the first you or anyone else is hearing about it.

[ - ] uvulectomy 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 19:27:26 ago (+0/-0)

"On AGENCY_HERE'S radar" has been a saying pretty much since radar has been a thing.

You won't find anything about this because I'm the first one to tell you about it.

"Just trust me bro!"

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 15, 2022 06:10:04 ago (+0/-0)

Do you think its more likely they do this, or that they don't? Its pretty fucking obvious at this point.

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 3 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 07:19:42 ago (+3/-0)

This is why no leadership has emerged for us. Some of us have understood this the entire time and conducted ourselves accordingly. All we need is the release of the info of this program, and i think thats coming...

[ - ] prototype [op] 2 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 08:11:38 ago (+2/-0)

"All we need is the release of the info of this program, and i think thats coming..."

Well this is the heads-up before any leak.

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 14, 2022 09:21:10 ago (+0/-0)*

@generaldisarray

Thoughts?