Sign into an existing account

You are surprisingly cogent and skilled at reusing other people's language.

"I'm just here to watch it all burn down"

yes, but do you pop popcorn? It's not a good show without popping popcorn.

"I have nearly unlimited capital, but no projects worth time to do because the end outcome of most of them will be subversion against their intended purpose"

Might I suggest a multitude of approaches? When a project fails to fulfill its purpose, you stop the project. Each one has a lifespan or shelf life. Same as politicians. Same as organizations.

It's not the individual or singular group that matters, anymore than one battle matters.

Ever hear the phrase "choose your battles?"

Thats the heart of strategy. You don't fight individual metaphorical engagements where you can't win, and you fight those that you can.

Why do you think hannibal crossed the alps? He was avoiding a number of walled cities--battles he couldn't win if he had to fight them all.

Think about the end goal, not about what is in front of you.

Every endeavor, every organization, every individual involved, has to be disposable and has to understand that at their core. It's about the ultimate and final campaign, be it social, religious, political, economic, or some other sphere of influence.

When looked at in this objective light, it is less important that projects or groups are subverted. That only tells you your cost and the useful shelf life of any front.

The task then becomes to maximize return on those projects, the amount of politicial/social/economic/etc damage they do, and maximize the rate you expand the effort.

You'll need a lot of people to run these efforts, a lot. All of them will have to understand their place, their utility, and the small part they will play and their essential disposable role in the campaign. All of them will have to be committed to the cause, fanatical even. ideology is the great driver of unity and faction, the great will to power of the longest lasting proverbial wars in human history.

What I talk about is the stuff of new religions.

In this regard approach is irrelevant. What matters is as many approaches as possible. The ability to manufacture social-trends-and-sentiments-as-a-sort-of-'war'-in-and-of-itself..
A whole culture beyond even siege, a big tent approach that inculcates in people that they are first and foremost,
not soldiers, but zealots.

The goal of which must be something that points beyond itself, the 'child' birthed of a constantly dying, genocided and doomed race, that is also constantly renewing and re-emerging from the ashes.
The God of which is utopianism.

Hatred is a powerful force but doesn't jib with the european nature of tolerance.
The greater evils necessary can only be motivated out of belief that it is for "the good of mankind."
And while this is the truth of it, it must also be the byline of the entire movement.

Unless someone embarks on such a massive 'public works' in the western mind, the power vacuum that is coming will be seized on by the jewish internationalists themselves, to manufacture a false movement and use it for the annihilation of millions more of our people before tearing it all down and creating an even greater police state than what currently exists in the west.

What we need is more than useful idiots, people who are beyond fear and greed and vain idealism. What we need are true believers:

A whole movement that finds them, cultivates them, and puts them to use, utterly pragmatically, in the erection of a covert superstate of ideology, an empire of both righteous action, inspired spirit, common ethos, and the mind.

What we need are crusaders and a crusade.

For example, anyone building a training camp, instead of training terrorists, should train fanatics (of the peaceful and lawful variety), but fanatics nevertheless.

What is after all, a church?

The expression of common cause, common origin, and culture, through worship, is the purest exercise of nationalism there is.

I'm not speaking of any particular religion, only religion as institution.

There is a huge power vacuum there incidentally--a great void of meaning in countless people's lives, utterly viciously and consuming for millions upon millions of people. And for the right cause they would dedicate their whole lives. What I'm saying is something, some movement, structured after religion, could very rapidly capitalize on, and convert, or recruit, several million people in the u.s. alone.

it could grow much faster than any political movement that would otherwise be suppressed. it could weather any attempts to splinter it much more effectively than any economic spearhead. And it would be much more strongly immune to astrotured metastasizing wokeism than so many social movements are.

These are my thoughts about what the future holds, could hold, or may hold, if the resources and will were there.

deleted

deleted

deleted

This is the most egregious case yet. Spread it far and wide (just like ur mum's pussy)