By contrast eating meat results in increased cancer, diabetes and heart disease risks among other things.
Eating meat does not post a health risk, despite the sources that say that in the bustle.com article, such as the WHO. I'm amazed how many people seem to think that food people have been eating for thousands of years suddenly are deemed health risks. In time, these same sources quietly say that they're not health risks after all. This includes salt, eggs, and butter, all of which were condemned but later exonerated of their "unhealthy" qualities.
Just looking at nude women isn't terribly unhealthy unless it becomes a habit and too much time is spent on it. The same can be said of anything enjoyable.
You said soft porn though, which involves some kind of sexual activity. That's for coomers. You need to find something better to do with your time.
I suppose it depends on how one defines soft porn. That can include nude women. Like Playboy. Guys jackoff to that - I'm here to inform you. I dunno why, say, solo girls are somehow substantially different.
What is a better way to spend time as a leisure activity than looking at hot white women? I think I'm paying proper obeisance to the sacred feminine.
We agree one shouldn't spend a lot of time on it though. And one should have a diversity of interests. My own personal opinion is one should change up their hobbies or exercise routine roughly every decade. Except for reading. That should be maintained.
Your post doesn't really address the topic though. And I think the question should be - given the context in which this non seq was directed at me - how bad for health is the stuff I post and should we all become vegetarians?
Or for that matter should we abstain from a lot of things people commonly use? Not that I believe that people here abstain from viewing porn (hypocrisy is one of the features in virtue posting not a bug) but I sense there are some drinkers and drug users here for example.
As Master Foo said sometime back I occasionally post the stuff. Can sometimes go weeks without posting it given particularly that I have long stretches away from this place, and I frequently repost already readied clips I prepared previously. The preparation itself takes minutes. The clips themselves too are usually minutes.
This isn't an extraordinary amount of time.
But if I so much as eat chicken or turkey I could get cancer.
Being something of a porn historian also does not involve the actual viewing of porn particularly. But hey, are the anti-Semites also porn historians? They've crafted this elaborate narrative where seemingly only Jewish pornographers should be mentioned historically.
I suppose it is only proper that eating a cow be more dangerous than viewing hot naked blondes.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 3, 2022 14:09:35 ago (+0/-0)
Eating meat does not post a health risk, despite the sources that say that in the bustle.com article, such as the WHO. I'm amazed how many people seem to think that food people have been eating for thousands of years suddenly are deemed health risks. In time, these same sources quietly say that they're not health risks after all. This includes salt, eggs, and butter, all of which were condemned but later exonerated of their "unhealthy" qualities.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 5 points 2.4 yearsDec 3, 2022 00:03:03 ago (+5/-0)
You said soft porn though, which involves some kind of sexual activity. That's for coomers. You need to find something better to do with your time.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 2.4 yearsDec 3, 2022 00:14:20 ago (+0/-2)
What is a better way to spend time as a leisure activity than looking at hot white women? I think I'm paying proper obeisance to the sacred feminine.
We agree one shouldn't spend a lot of time on it though. And one should have a diversity of interests. My own personal opinion is one should change up their hobbies or exercise routine roughly every decade. Except for reading. That should be maintained.
Your post doesn't really address the topic though. And I think the question should be - given the context in which this non seq was directed at me - how bad for health is the stuff I post and should we all become vegetarians?
Or for that matter should we abstain from a lot of things people commonly use? Not that I believe that people here abstain from viewing porn (hypocrisy is one of the features in virtue posting not a bug) but I sense there are some drinkers and drug users here for example.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 3 points 2.4 yearsDec 3, 2022 00:17:05 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] -2 points 2.4 yearsDec 3, 2022 00:26:37 ago (+0/-2)*
This isn't an extraordinary amount of time.
But if I so much as eat chicken or turkey I could get cancer.
Being something of a porn historian also does not involve the actual viewing of porn particularly. But hey, are the anti-Semites also porn historians? They've crafted this elaborate narrative where seemingly only Jewish pornographers should be mentioned historically.
I suppose it is only proper that eating a cow be more dangerous than viewing hot naked blondes.