☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
-1

A nude early 20s Angelina Jolie

submitted by Joe_McCarthy to Playboy 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 22:02:28 ago (+1/-2)     (Playboy)



13 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 23:25:46 ago (+2/-0)

She was raised to be a sexual object. It was obviously pervasive in her house. Remember when she gave her brother and open mouth kiss at an awards show. She was taught to feel no shame exhibiting her body either before people (which was likely most of her life) and before a camera. The latter was likely how she gained entry to making films.

Joe, you're a degenerate. This girl is a victim of lifelong child abuse.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 23:39:36 ago (+0/-0)

Dunno anything about any supposed child abuse. But if so I must say she seems to have done well in life in overcoming it by conventional standards. Rich, successful, beautiful, and looked great naked when young. What more do most people ask for?

Do you want your ban lifted in OE by the way? Nevermind - I'll just lift it. I'm much less the jerk than you are you understand.

[ - ] dulcima 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 01:40:28 ago (+1/-0)

Angelina has a "rainbow family", a tranny kid, and is up to her neck with the United Nations. Being wealthy and successful doesn't mean you are an evil person, but the other stuff, yes. She is certainly a nutbag at the very least.

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 00:06:55 ago (+0/-0)

Of course she's a victim of sexual abuse. Her parents are jewish.

[ - ] DoubleHappyDog 2 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 22:33:55 ago (+2/-0)

I don't see the appeal

[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 22:39:58 ago (+1/-0)

It's not even the good kind of crazy.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 22:35:48 ago (+0/-0)

Really? She's fully naked from behind. Nice ass.

[ - ] Shotinthedark 1 point 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 02:05:17 ago (+1/-0)

Her tits aren't that great

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 00:06:23 ago (+0/-0)

https://www.jta.org/2013/05/19/ny/angelinas-jewish-gene

Genetically jewish. Only thing I'm hitting that with is a baseball bat.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 00:10:49 ago (+0/-0)

Erm, just scanned that - but it looks like your article is ATTACKING the idea she is Jewish. You might wanna read that again.

3/8 Slav, 3/8 Germanic, 1/4 French Canadian, and apparently neglible injun.

https://ethnicelebs.com/angelina-jolie

She is part Polish though. They have the highest Jewish imprint among Europeans I believe. But the admixture is likely even less than her Huron if it is even there at all.

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 00:20:16 ago (+0/-0)

Do you not know how to read articles written by jews? The fact is she has genes that are much more common among people of jewish descent than non jews. The spin is "oh but there's still a chance she's not a jew!" Don't mistake the spin for the facts.

Does the ethnicity site you linked to even measure jewishness? Her dad is one of those "catholics" who's super pro-jewish and even supports jewish extremists like Chabad. It's one of those obvious "yeah they're jewish but they call themselves catholic and German" things.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsDec 1, 2022 00:45:54 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah. It measures Jewishness when it is known. At the end of the day we're mostly dealing with what is known. It is all we can do.

On that note I DID note she is part Polish. 1/8. That means she could have a minute amount of Jewish ancestry. But is she Jewish? Is she Huron? Looks kinda Indian to me if anything.

Which is to say I think you're probably hung up on what is unimportant.

[ - ] Joe_McCarthy [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 30, 2022 22:04:35 ago (+0/-0)

Probably 21 here. Maybe 20 or 22.