Sign into an existing account

Doesn't matter. Your posting behavior speaks louder than anything you could say. Stop posting of young teenage girls and women with small tits who look like they're 15, and perhaps people will take you a little more seriously. Meanwhile, you've done more damage to your reputation that I ever could.

I never had a quarrel with you. But since you insulted me, I'd like to parse what you said.


Do you mean sex with a 16 year old is not obscene BUT sex with an infant is obscene?

Do you mean sex with a 16 year old is not AS obscene as sex with an infant?

Those are two very different concepts. Since you're so interested in "definitions" of words, you should probably be just as interested in the same kind of specificity in your language and your phrasing.

I didn't insult you or call you a pedophile, but you called me a retard for no reason. I honestly don't know what you're so defensive about.

well...not "all" he's after...

Truth has an inconvenient way of being inconvenient.

I understand what you're saying, that they are two different sexual attractions, pedophilia and ephebophilia, but it doesn't matter whether the terms are misused, what they describe is wrong and sick and the people who have these perversions are wrong and sick. I'm not going to get hung up on the correct word to describe it when it only serves to take attention away from the perversion and focuses it on the terminology.

I consider the vast majority of young people under 18 to be too young to understand the implications of sexual congress. They are too young, too inexperienced, and too immature. This is especially so for children just entering puberty.

I know most homosexuals have an obsession for youth, and they seek very young boys in their teens. Technically this could be called ephebophilia, but I really don't give a fuck. They're kiddy diddling pedophiles who need to be killed slowly and painfully.

Men who lust after teen girls, especially those under 16, also deserve to be in this category. OP, if that applies to you, you're a sick fuck.

What you're doing is playing with semantics, trying to confuse the thing with the word. Defining the word, refining it with additional descriptive words to be more specific, etc., doesn't change the actual thing. The word is not the object. The map is not the place. The fact remains that only sick fucks (possibly like you) quibble about language that describes it instead of condemning the thing itself. I say again: Only pedophiles do that.

deleted

We have 'people' that are here to disrupt and waste our valuable time on the clock more like. At minimum assholes. Shouldn't be here either way.

Near as I can tell none of the 'pedos' here have ever indicated they've had sex with a female under 18. I know I haven't. Even when I was under 18.

No. I posted solo girls. But I know that's the worst thing on this earth! Other than thinking Britney was fuckable at 16 of course.

https://youtu.be/C-u5WLJ9Yk4

Not any different in what way? If you actually believe that you need to pay more attention. What I do is actually dangerous.

Pilpul

dictionaries, encyclopedias, medical textbook
Lol, fuckhole. Those are all shitjolés