The Progressive Left loves to argue that there is no such thing as Objective (or Moral) truth.
But if there is not, then they could have no objection to someone (say) robbing them. As what might be wrong in their eyes might be perfectly fine in the eyes of their assailant.
And if there is no Objective/Moral truth, on what basis could they object should someone rob them? They surely have abdicated the right to claim, "that is wrong."
They’re nihilists who whimper if someone is called fat faggot for being a perverted pig.
What they’re looking for in this particular alliance is a means of corrupting straight men.
That’s what they do with any alliance, ecumenical movement or political reaching across the isle.
For, verily, it is not only true that a bad apple spoils the bunch, but that a bad apple in the moral sense has as its motivation the spoilage of the bunch, and is seeking, via a false alliance, the corrupted legal authority to so do.
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 27, 2022 11:24:40 ago (+0/-0)
Those people lack the testicular fortitude for, what your masters call, will to power.
BECAUSE I SAID SO. Your parents tried to teach you.
The will to act is power. There is more to it ofc, but it starts there.
Sorry, I completely lost the plot of the fag alliance, when you went into objective truth.
[ + ] PrincessRobotBubblegum
[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 27, 2022 07:04:41 ago (+0/-0)
They’re nihilists who whimper if someone is called fat faggot for being a perverted pig.
What they’re looking for in this particular alliance is a means of corrupting straight men.
That’s what they do with any alliance, ecumenical movement or political reaching across the isle.
For, verily, it is not only true that a bad apple spoils the bunch, but that a bad apple in the moral sense has as its motivation the spoilage of the bunch, and is seeking, via a false alliance, the corrupted legal authority to so do.