He didn't provoke unrest or destabilize the region, he had a small cult that was insular and had little effect on those outside of it, it was heretical, but the way in which it was dealt with was suitable for as minor an issue as it was.
Saying it was a big deal is like saying a one time shoplifter is the world's worst criminal. It's a gross exaggeration.
What happened was that it was passover, and as was tradition they were having challah bread and gefelte fishes, but feared they would not have enough, turned out they had more than they anticipated, and were able to feed the multitudes who had gathered for the feast, this was attributed to Jesus, nothing was air dropped, nothing was even produced from nothing, if there was a miracle it was that Jesus took the loaves and fishes that were brought and distributed them in such a way that everyone had something to eat.
Jesus died and was later said by his followers to have appeared and performed some miracles before disappearing again, this was in a time when mistaking dreams for reality was common, also there might have been hallucinations that were produced either through religious fervor or through the psychoactive effects of their diet or environmental conditions, and there is also a habit of religious cults making extraordinary claims about their leaders, and a post death visit is by far the most clichéd of them, even in those days, lastly we cannot dismiss the idea of legends forming around the guy, Jesus certainly was charismatic enough of a leader to have stories rise up around him, especially a hundred years after his death in a time of widespread illiteracy.
He was killed because the pharisees requested it, he was not the first nor the last.
He was requested to be killed for spreading heresy, and attempting to incite the jewish people to secede from the pharisees, not in that he had actually led any sort of major disruption within said community.
The pharisees were doing just fine, he was a major disruption, but they beleive in putting down the criminals like him when they show up.
Unfortunately in his case he had not exactly broken any jewish laws that would make him able to be legally killed, so for people like him the pharisee take advantage of a loophole that allowed them to get the romans to kill on their behalf.
The Romans would do so in the name of maintaining good relations with the jews in their territories, it was kind of like how your country will deport expats to face punishment in their homelands when requested in the name of diplomatic relations.
All in all, he was a tiny it disruptive, but never majorly so, for the most part he could have been ignored by the pharisees.
Kind of like how a large chain store could bear to ignore a shoplifter of a single item, as they would not cause too much of a problem for the company, but the company would want to prosecute every shoplifter they can in the interests of preventing some accumulative effect from multiple actsof shoplifting, and to set an example of what happens to those who break the store rules.
The Empire had been conquered for 600 years or so. Few Hebrews were left in Judea in Jesus' time. Many left or were previously expelled. Those are called the lost sheep of Israel. Jesus came for them, not the "dogs" or other races. While Babylon ruled over Judea, shit got fucked. Hebrews started listening to their eternal enemies: Edomites and the like. Those are the cursed offspring of a race-mixer. Yahweh hates race-mixing, like a lot. He ordered us to genocide another group of cursed race-mixers: the canaanites. We disobeyed and didn't finish them off. It is (((they))) who weren't finished who've been thorn in our side ever since.
The scriptures promote racial purity and supremacy. And it's quite clear kikes wrote the Talmud, and not the Hebrew scriptures.
To ignore these ideas is lazy. Read a book, nigger.
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 2 points 2.4 yearsNov 26, 2022 22:47:59 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 27, 2022 01:00:53 ago (+0/-0)
Saying it was a big deal is like saying a one time shoplifter is the world's worst criminal. It's a gross exaggeration.
What happened was that it was passover, and as was tradition they were having challah bread and gefelte fishes, but feared they would not have enough, turned out they had more than they anticipated, and were able to feed the multitudes who had gathered for the feast, this was attributed to Jesus, nothing was air dropped, nothing was even produced from nothing, if there was a miracle it was that Jesus took the loaves and fishes that were brought and distributed them in such a way that everyone had something to eat.
Jesus died and was later said by his followers to have appeared and performed some miracles before disappearing again, this was in a time when mistaking dreams for reality was common, also there might have been hallucinations that were produced either through religious fervor or through the psychoactive effects of their diet or environmental conditions, and there is also a habit of religious cults making extraordinary claims about their leaders, and a post death visit is by far the most clichéd of them, even in those days, lastly we cannot dismiss the idea of legends forming around the guy, Jesus certainly was charismatic enough of a leader to have stories rise up around him, especially a hundred years after his death in a time of widespread illiteracy.
Jesus has no friends in the USA.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 27, 2022 09:16:06 ago (+0/-0)
The Romans crucified him for no reason?
What is the bible belt?
[ + ] AntiPostmodernist
[ - ] AntiPostmodernist 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 27, 2022 10:11:16 ago (+0/-0)
He was requested to be killed for spreading heresy, and attempting to incite the jewish people to secede from the pharisees, not in that he had actually led any sort of major disruption within said community.
The pharisees were doing just fine, he was a major disruption, but they beleive in putting down the criminals like him when they show up.
Unfortunately in his case he had not exactly broken any jewish laws that would make him able to be legally killed, so for people like him the pharisee take advantage of a loophole that allowed them to get the romans to kill on their behalf.
The Romans would do so in the name of maintaining good relations with the jews in their territories, it was kind of like how your country will deport expats to face punishment in their homelands when requested in the name of diplomatic relations.
All in all, he was a tiny it disruptive, but never majorly so, for the most part he could have been ignored by the pharisees.
Kind of like how a large chain store could bear to ignore a shoplifter of a single item, as they would not cause too much of a problem for the company, but the company would want to prosecute every shoplifter they can in the interests of preventing some accumulative effect from multiple actsof shoplifting, and to set an example of what happens to those who break the store rules.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 27, 2022 10:12:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 28, 2022 20:49:48 ago (+0/-0)
The retard above is pulling shit out of his midwit ass per usual.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 29, 2022 05:04:40 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] MrDarkWater
[ - ] MrDarkWater 0 points 2.4 yearsNov 29, 2022 11:19:43 ago (+0/-0)
The scriptures promote racial purity and supremacy. And it's quite clear kikes wrote the Talmud, and not the Hebrew scriptures.
To ignore these ideas is lazy. Read a book, nigger.