×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
58

Gov. Abbot of Texas invokes Article 1 of the Constitution, Declares an invasion.

submitted by Glowbright to whatever 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 15:31:07 ago (+59/-1)     (gov.texas.gov)

https://gov.texas.gov/uploads/files/press/County_Judge_Invasion_Letter.pdf

November 14, 2022
Re: Defending Texas Against Invasion

Dear County Judge;

Thank you for the letter from your county expressing support for what Texas is doing to secure
the border. As you know, President Biden has abandoned his responsibility to enforce immigration laws, and Congress has refused to hold the President accountable and has abandoned its own responsibility to use the immigration power given to it in Article I, § 8 of the U.S. Constitution.

Just two years ago, we had the fewest illegal crossings in decades. This past year under President Biden, an all-time record was set for the number of immigrants crossing the border illegally.

Texas has forcefully responded to Biden’s open border policies by doing more than any state in the history of America to do the federal government’s job to secure the border. In my Executive Order GA-41, I invoked the Invasion Clauses of Article I, § 10 of the U.S. Constitution and Article IV, § 7 of the Texas Constitution to fully authorize Texas to take unprecedented measures to fight back against the invasion at our border. As Governor of Texas and commander-in-chief of its military forces, I am using that constitutional authority, as well as other authorization and Executive Orders to:

• Deploy the National Guard to safeguard our border and to repel and turn back immigrants trying to cross the border illegally;
• Deploy the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) to arrest and return to the border immigrants who crossed illegally and deploy DPS to arrest illegal immigrants for criminal activity;
• Build a border wall in multiple counties on the border;
• Deploy gun boats to secure the border;
• Designate Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations;
• Enter into a compact with other states to secure the border;
• Enter into agreements with foreign powers to enhance border security; and
• Provide resources for border counties to increase their efforts to respond to the border
invasion.

Texas has devoted more than $4 billion of Texas taxpayer dollars toward these and other efforts to secure the border and enhance public safety. In January 2023 when the next Congress is sworn in, we must remind our representatives in Washington that securing the border is the federal government’s responsibility under Article I, § 8 and Article IV, § 4 of the U.S. Constitution. Congress should reimburse the State of Texas for the billions of dollars we have had to spend on border security in the Biden Administration’s absence. Federal officials who will not faithfully execute the immigrations laws should face hearings and even impeachment. Finally, Congress should amend statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 242 to ensure that our Troopers and Guardsmen are not exposed to federal criminal prosecution for protecting Texas against illegal entry between the ports of entry.

Join me in sending this urgent message to our congressional delegation, which has the power to
act under Article I, § 8 of the U.S. Constitution. Texas has done more than its fair share for far too long. The time has come for the federal government to do its job.

Sincerely,
Greg Abbott
Governor


34 comments block


[ - ] 1234lkjh -1 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 19:46:36 ago (+0/-1)

Right, but you have to be able to keep the power on first so those Texas fatties can keep eating.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels -1 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 20:05:12 ago (+0/-1)

Article 1, Section 8 reads "The Congress shall have Power To..............To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;", not the Governor.

So no, he isn't invoking it because he can't......per the US Constitution. He can however enforce state and federal law. Why Congress isn't obeying the Constitution only they know while we all suspect.

If they don't obey the laws in our "nation of laws" then we do not have to recognize their authority. It works both ways.

[ - ] Glowbright [op] 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 22:33:45 ago (+2/-1)

Try reading again. He did not invoke Article I, Section 8.

I invoked the Invasion Clauses of Article I, § 10 of the U.S. Constitution

Section 10 only says one thing: It prohibits a state from dong a bunch of stuff like raising a army, or waging war, unless actually invaded That is the ONLY thing section 10 states. Abbot invoked section 10 specifically. He is saying "Texas reclaims the right to these powers in order to repel an invasion"

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 04:17:08 ago (+0/-0)

Try reading again.

I'm sorry, what part of fucking stupid don't you understand? Again, I know he isn't invoking Article 1 Section 8 because LIKE I SAID, HE CAN'T. But the post title, and even the fucking quote you posted says "I invoke".

So you, and whatever fuck retard that down voted my correct answer should fuck the fuck off and learn to read.

[ - ] Glowbright [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 08:38:54 ago (+0/-0)

Wow you get all butt hurt when you are wrong... try reading again. That little phrase in Section 10 that says "...unless actually invaded" actually means some thing... It means you are a dumbshit who cannot read.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 16:27:06 ago (+0/-0)*

Section. 8.
The Congress shall have Power To .............To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

That's what it says dumb fuck. Again dumbfuck, he does not have the power per the US Constitution to "invoke" Article 1 Section 10 dumb fuck.

Try being less fucking stupid.

Edit: Excuuuuuuse me, you're talking about section 10. Read it.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

Let me read it for you how it applies......"No State shall, WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS, ........... or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay"

So yes, JUST LIKE I FUCKING SAID ABOVE DUMB FUCK, "He can however enforce state and federal law.", or we'll call it "war" while the invaders are unarmed, or he can enforce the law. Understand now dumb fuck.

Just because you say or read something doesn't make it factual.

[ - ] Glowbright [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 17, 2022 12:42:24 ago (+0/-0)

WOW. You really are retarded. Section 10 says "unless invaded". This is why he specifically calls out section 10.

By declaring an invasion, Abbot is saying "All those rules in the Constitution that say I can't are now null and void."

I don't think you know what the word 'invoke' means. Of course he has the power to invoke section 10.

invoke: verb, To cite or appeal to (someone or something) as an authority for an action or in support of an argument

This is not some 'power' that can be 'taken away'. At first I thought you were a dumbshit... Now I think you are glowing a little

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:12:43 ago (+0/-0)

Biden will denounce this and do anything he can to stop it in 3, 2,

[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:38:11 ago (+2/-0)

Of course. And Abbott is anticipating that the federal government May declare any state or National guard units that follow abbots directives to be doing something illegal which is why Abbott has said the law needs to be amended so that the federal government cannot declare their actions to be illegal. But in the meantime if Biden does declare their actions illegal and tries to arrest National guard's members and Texas officials you know you then have two armed groups basically claiming jurisdiction and that's the kind of stuff that really creates skirmishes that became incidents that become civil wars.

But let's face it it's the last stand right now to save America as we knew it and thank God Abbott apparently is going to do this.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:34:37 ago (+0/-0)

It's really too bad they have stolen Arizona elections. Kari Lake would have been a really good ally for Abbott and Texas .

[ - ] Hoobeejoo 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:45:34 ago (+0/-0)

Will not work. There was no provision in this article for shooting invaders. Unless this is treated like the war that it is, these roaches will continue to infest.

[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 20:25:23 ago (+0/-0)

Just because it isnt printed doesnt mean its not already in motion some 20+yrs now
Breibart is not Texas news.
Most of what pops in Texas never makes the news.
We quite folk like that most times.
Shallow grave kinda thing.
Thug Life some where besides Texas if you want a funeral.

[ - ] winners_history 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 23:22:48 ago (+0/-0)

Article IV, § 4

For those who attended public school recently, that section says

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion;...

Source

[ - ] Glowbright [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 08:35:22 ago (+0/-0)

Did you read your own comment? We are talking about Article 1, Section 10 and you quoted Article IV.

Article 1, Section 10 is the part that says that individual States cannot raise armies, wage wars, or negotiate with foreign states, UNLESS INVADED. This is Abbot saying "Texas will do this our selves if DC will not help"

[ - ] totes_magotes 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 06:31:22 ago (+0/-0)

It's simple: Shoot the invaders, leave bodies to rot and more invaders to find, post signs at the border that this is what will happen to every invader.

[ - ] Glowbright [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 17, 2022 12:45:58 ago (+0/-0)

I always try to be very careful to not advocate violence online, but I agree that the traditional and time-tested method of repelling an invasion is to kill the invaders.

[ - ] AmalekTheZOG 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 18:25:29 ago (+0/-0)

Went expecting to be Kokomoed.

Sad now.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:33:21 ago (+1/-0)

Is anybody know why this letter was written to the county judge?

[ - ] RobertJHarsh 2 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 19:55:46 ago (+2/-0)

Form letter for each of the 254 counties.

[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 22:11:22 ago (+1/-0)

What took him so long now that millions are here and will NEVER go back

[ - ] carnold03 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 22:21:17 ago (+1/-0)*

"Hell, it's about time." If this is actually real, Texans are about to find out just how Texan their state is and by default Americans are about to find out how American their country is. This will be very interesting, indeed.

[ - ] 2Drunk 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 22:53:32 ago (+0/-0)

So by "how American their country is" Texas is going to be hit with some kind of disaster and the jewish owned federal government is going to be "fuck off, no aid for you!"?

[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 05:22:52 ago (+1/-0)

The jewloving faggot waited until re-election, nice. None of this shit will be implemented in any meaningful form, except 'gibs Mexico more money that will be stolen'.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 2 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:33:03 ago (+2/-0)

"In my Executive Order GA-41, I invoked the Invasion Clauses of Article I, § 10 of the U.S.
Constitution and Article IV, § 7 of the Texas Constitution to fully authorize Texas to take
unprecedented measures to fight back against the invasion at our border. As Governor of Texas
and commander-in-chief of its military forces, I am using that constitutional authority, as well as
other authorization and Executive Orders to:
• Deploy the National Guard to safeguard our border and to repel and turn back immigrants
trying to cross the border illegally;
• Deploy the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) to arrest and return to the border
immigrants who crossed illegally and deploy DPS to arrest illegal immigrants for
criminal activity;
• Build a border wall in multiple counties on the border;
• Deploy gun boats to secure the border;
• Designate Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations;
• Enter into a compact with other states to secure the border;
• Enter into agreements with foreign powers to enhance border security; and
• Provide resources for border counties to increase their efforts to respond to the borde"

First of all I'm loving the gun boat item. I want to see gun boats in the river between Texas and mexico.

Secondly this is exactly the kind of thing that can cause a state to trigger a civil War as border states line up against the federal government that refuses to do its job and border states deploy military force to do it.

And if you start getting an alliance of states to group together to do this there's more chance of a civil war. I mean that's really sort of how the South began to resist the North in the civil War in the 1800s.

He did what he had to do and I'm glad to see he's doing it. Can't wait to see those gun boats in the river.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 3 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:39:28 ago (+3/-0)

Let's not forget that Texas is unique among the states and that it has several outclauses in its joining agreement with the United states. I forget the details of them but it is unique in that it can reverse its decision to join the United States and most other states really don't have that legal ability.

[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 17:08:20 ago (+1/-0)

After the fracking boom texas and SE new mexico really could leave the United States. A lot of money is made in energy these days

[ - ] texasblood 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 20:17:35 ago (+1/-0)

We are a fucking REPUBLIC.
STEER/QUEER Yankees fear it

[ - ] lastlist 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 16, 2022 01:16:54 ago (+0/-0)

it can reverse its decision to join the United States

Not legally. However, it can breakup into 5 new states.

[ - ] HeyJames 4 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 15:36:48 ago (+4/-0)

Finally he grew some balls. Only took a few million coming in. He needs to establish roving immigration squads with a mandate that any illegal found is a foreign enemy combatant. Those already here must be removed or texas is doomed demographically (probably is no matter what)

Federal officials who will not faithfully execute the immigrations laws should face hearings and even impeachment

Don't think a strongly worded letter will do much here buddy.

[ - ] Glowbright [op] 6 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 15:38:26 ago (+6/-0)

In my Executive Order GA-41, I invoked the Invasion Clauses of Article I, § 10 of the U.S. Constitution and Article IV, § 7 of the Texas Constitution

Why this is important: Article I, Section 10, Clause 3:

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

By explicitly invoking "the Invasion Clauses of Article I, § 10" Gov. Abbot is giving himself the authority to raise an army and conduct military actions to repel the invasion. This will also allow him to designate illegal aliens as 'enemy combatants' which can be dealt with via military courts rather than immigration courts.

[ - ] Portmanure 11 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 15:53:02 ago (+11/-0)

This could have a domino effect which is why Arizona democrats are cheating so hard to win the governors office.

[ - ] Crackinjokes 1 point 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:35:53 ago (+1/-0)

Yeah it's definitely one of the reasons I agree. Plus Kari lake threatened to really reverse a lot of the things there do a lot of investigations so it was all or nothing for them.

You know assuming Carrie lake was not just another fake candidate I'm really disappointed that she didn't melt illegal battle about fake ballots and fake machines and all these other things before the election rather than trying to address the stuff once again after the fact when it's extremely hard to reverse.

[ - ] RobertJHarsh 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 19:54:52 ago (+0/-0)

Exactly. Texas very well might put a near-end to illegal aliens but they will just go to Arizona instead.

[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.6 yearsNov 15, 2022 21:50:07 ago (+0/-0)

Lol imagine being Americans and persisting with the current electoral system.

Watching usa rot like a corpse is better laughed at than anything else lest sanity be tested