[ - ] localsal 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 14, 2022 23:59:17 ago (+1/-0)
Exactly. These (((wef))) wannabes should be the baseline, and everybody with a lower carbon footprint should get a cash rebate directly from the (((wef))) budget.
Notice how this faggot calls us consumers, might as well call us cattle. Also implicitly stating that they're exempt from the systems they impose on us.
The next (((WEF))) summit is coming up pretty soon, is it not? Putin or Xi should just do us all a solid and wipe Davos off the map while all those fuckstains are in town.
[ - ] o0shad0o 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 09:21:22 ago (+1/-0)
I'm sorry, but we're going to have to ban the sales of unprepared foods, because it will curtail proper individual tracking. You can't buy groceries any more, you can only buy pre-prepared meals. With ze boogs.
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 00:31:58 ago (+1/-0)*
Their personal travel by jet and yacht probably creates an annual footprint greater than a small town's. I'm not certain, but I don't even think that's unrealistic. I recall reading that the CO2 output of a large yacht annually was equal to a couple thousand autos.
Not that it matters, since that's actually a bad argument to make. It plays into the notion that we have an atmospheric CO2 problem. We don't.
Not that it matters, since that's actually a bad argument to make. It plays into the notion that we have an atmospheric CO2 problem.
They are the ones making the assertion that there is a C02 problem, so it seems rather hypocritical to then make as much of it as possible to fight a reduction in c02. Thats the point being made.
It is a bad thing, for one, it's a fucking pipe dream, you don't have the technology or the intelligence to implement this, by a long shot. Your house of cards is crumbling before your very eyes. The planet will be here long after your feeble ass dies. Furthermore, the ones you serve are the biggest polluters and energy consumers bar none.
Your purchases, travel tickets etc are all already being tracked.
But on individual or government only platforms. it's about getting these platforms to 'talk to each other'. After that it's a fairly simple exercise to attribute a 'carbon score' to items and activities.
1. It doesn't actually require 100% compliance accross 100% of purchases.
(The problem stems from idiots consuming goyslop etc)
B. Unless you're buying crack in some back alley - cash can be traced, and systems can be put in place to encourage and/or require the use of cash scanning machines.
iii. A fallback will be to just assign a carbon score to each unit of money - again incentivize you not to use it, though there will of course be a carbon credit free monthly allowance to make uptake of the new systems more palatable
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 1.4 yearsNov 14, 2022 22:32:15 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] GeneralDisarray
[ - ] GeneralDisarray 5 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 02:21:25 ago (+5/-0)
I'm not joking.
It a totalitarian clampdown on us and a free for all for them.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 14, 2022 23:59:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] WEFdeniableaccount
[ - ] WEFdeniableaccount -1 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 07:17:58 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 2 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 09:56:09 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheYiddler
[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 16:53:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 2 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 07:11:05 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] WEFdeniableaccount
[ - ] WEFdeniableaccount 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 07:19:25 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 07:30:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] uvulectomy
[ - ] uvulectomy 2 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 00:35:38 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 10:24:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Shitstartercarter
[ - ] Shitstartercarter 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 10:22:26 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] o0shad0o
[ - ] o0shad0o 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 09:21:22 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Prairie
[ - ] Prairie 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 08:40:50 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 04:46:05 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] JoesLegHair
[ - ] JoesLegHair 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 06:24:55 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 00:31:58 ago (+1/-0)*
Not that it matters, since that's actually a bad argument to make. It plays into the notion that we have an atmospheric CO2 problem. We don't.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 04:08:48 ago (+0/-0)
They are the ones making the assertion that there is a C02 problem, so it seems rather hypocritical to then make as much of it as possible to fight a reduction in c02. Thats the point being made.
[ + ] WEFdeniableaccount
[ - ] WEFdeniableaccount -3 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 07:16:31 ago (+0/-3)
Because it isn't.
Why is it ok for your children and grandchildren to live in a polluted world on account of some kikes short sighted profit?
Why should the planet suffer, so that dumb niggers can carry on buying dumb shit they don't need, with your tax money, without thought or consequence.
Why should your air quality decline because some dumb slut with an empty head and daddies I'll gotten gains needs to take another holiday?
Are you able to resist current product?
You will be unaffected or rewarded.
Is one holiday abroad a year enough for you?
You will be unaffected or rewarded?
We have lived in the world of profits over people - and look at what that has done?
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 2 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 07:42:41 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Isaacjan
[ - ] Isaacjan 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 08:05:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 1 point 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 08:25:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Isaacjan
[ - ] Isaacjan 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 08:28:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] WEFdeniableaccount
[ - ] WEFdeniableaccount 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 08:17:38 ago (+0/-0)
It's not so much about creating new technologies, as it is about joining up the existing ones.
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 08:25:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] WEFdeniableaccount
[ - ] WEFdeniableaccount 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 09:21:35 ago (+0/-0)
But on individual or government only platforms. it's about getting these platforms to 'talk to each other'. After that it's a fairly simple exercise to attribute a 'carbon score' to items and activities.
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 09:32:37 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] WEFdeniableaccount
[ - ] WEFdeniableaccount 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 10:02:25 ago (+0/-0)
(The problem stems from idiots consuming goyslop etc)
B. Unless you're buying crack in some back alley - cash can be traced, and systems can be put in place to encourage and/or require the use of cash scanning machines.
iii. A fallback will be to just assign a carbon score to each unit of money - again incentivize you not to use it, though there will of course be a carbon credit free monthly allowance to make uptake of the new systems more palatable
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 10:14:33 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Leveraction
[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 1.4 yearsNov 15, 2022 10:27:24 ago (+0/-0)