Ancient Egyptians were white and they were genocide.
Modern Egyptians are Arab rapists and they are very good at making male captives lose their balls and smashing skills of their fuck slaves mixed babies.
See why no niggers exist in Arabia despite taking tens of millions of black slaves
True, however, black arabs do exist somehow in modernity. Either by converting and migrating in the past century or some balls were not smashed thoroughly. You can see them mostly in current day Egypt but also in the gulf Arab states.
lol nope. all the kings and pharaohs were white with euro dna, some of it directly connected to Irish. They had red or blonde hair and blue eyes. Ooga boogas were never that far north.
Yeah, here's the problem. Retards believe retarded shit. Then they post their retarded shit to message boards. Then the retard virus spreads and you just end up with more retards who believe more retarded shit.
Over time pigments change. Soft tissues break up. And the only way you can determine what a mummy is racially, is either by DNA, or by measuring bones.
Lincoln wasn't blonde haired, idiot. That's my point. Pigments change over time. You can't just look at a mummy and tell what color its hair was.
And, no, King tut's DNA wasn't White. Stop believing stupid shit. Closest thing you will find is a reference to haplotype R1a, which basically means he has a common ancestor with 50% of Europeans within 20,000 years ago. Whites are only about 5,000 years old. (Battle Axe Culture).
Here's the thing that should convince you. Take a REAL White person. Plop him down in the Nile Delta. No malaria antibiotics. No air conditioning. No water purification. No modern conveniences. Come back a year later to visit his grave. "HERE LIES LIAM McGEE. HE SHAT HIMSELF TO DEATH"
That's what happened to every White person to enter Africa before the 16th century. We are adapted for Forests and Fjords.
@3Whuurs, ^this is what I was talking about when I said they are indistinguishable from Black Israelites. @Belfuro is clearly the guy you need to be asking questions. Hebrews are the REAL Whites! Fuck Malaria and Yellow fever. White people just hung out in the sun without any problems!
Clearly I'm wrong. This guy knows what he's talking about.
Whites evolved 10k-30k years ago and spread throughout Europe. Anatolia. Levant and Egypt
Rameses 2 had red hair. As his pigments were studied under electron microscope
You should try posting links to these kind of claims because there’s more then a small amount of historical record (and not main stream bullshit) tracking indo Europeans that doesn’t include these timelines at all. Look at the indo european migration starting from the Yamnaya people. This is essentially (but not exactly) white history. Starting 1000 years before the Egyptian empire started, and the furthest south whites migrated was northern Turkey. At least in any noticeable numbers.
The entire Sumerian empire was between the indo Europeans and Egyptian empire at that time. If you have something solid on whites (indo europeans) being that far south 10-30k years ago, you should post it.
Where have you seen evidence of this? Without modern dna evidence, philology is the best indicator of race back then, and there’s no evidence I’ve seen of linguistic connections between indo Europeans and Egyptians. Or even indo europeans and the Sumerians between us and the Egyptians. I’m not saying that it’s not possible for some small elite white class to have made it into those cultures, I’ve just never seen anything but fairly wild hearsay.
As far as civilization in general goes, I’m not sure why so many of us are desperate to associate ourselves with these other cultures. What Indo Europeans had on the step was far greater than what the egyptians had, or the Sumerians before them or the babylonians after them. We had the entire northern hemisphere to ourselves in a perfect “ethnostate”. The best evidence I see for white influence in these empires isn’t there technology, it’s that their greatest technology was so far beyond the rest of their society that they didn’t even seem to know how to maintain good historical record of it. Like, the pyramids are pretty amazing but the Egyptian empire peaked pretty quick, and didn’t advance much at all for like 1000 years cause they were to stupid to design a proper alphabet and language that could facilitate abstract thought and philosophical concept. So they were incapable of philosophical, technological and societal advancement. And there’s little to no record of them slowly advancing to the point of the pyramids. That kind of math and engineering should have shown itself in 1000s of other advancements, yet it just didn’t.
This on its own makes it seem highly likely of some outside influence, and I don’t mean aliens. Yet the civilization before them, the Sumerians, seemed to do little else but design a language and some writing, which the Egyptians did little to advance.
Then the Babylonians after them, weren’t even close to as advanced as they were, and contributed almost nothing from there.
Like all these empires people envy were just glorified city states that managed to organize their slaves and plunder into a civilization 1 at a time when there was no competition. Seemingly just taking everything from their predecessors and relocating some of it. Organization is really the best that can be said of these “empires”.
It wasn’t until the 8th century BC when whites put their first real mark on empire and truly built real civilization in the Greek empire. And it literally became the birth place of the enlightenment, because it was the first European civilization. And we did it specifically because we understood advanced abstract thought and conceived of the tools to achieve these things, which was alphabet and language. I’m not religious, and don’t endorse E. Michael Jones generally, and I even came away from reading it with quite the opposite takeaway then he, I’m sure, intended. But his Logos book documents this EXTREMELY well ! And how the Greek philosophical progression invented science specifically by debunking Greek mythology but proving creation by a single eternal creator, purely through philosophy. Hense “the enlightenment”.
(Side note) imo Christianity was Jews co-opting the enlightenment. Because they seen mythology dismantled and science (cosmology) created by proving creation, and they co-opted it by attaching their Hebrew history to it with the saviour prophecy to create the big conversion event. And the Roman emperors went along with it because they’d known for 1000+ years that mythology is always needed for societal cohesion. Forever perverting what would have been an actual enlightenment.
I get the draw to buy in to these accounts of empires always being white run, but you have to understand the progression of the indo Europeans first, and then have decent evidence of some branch going way off course, like Egypt. Not saying it’s impossible, but mummies and hair samples just aren’t enough without solid DNA. And indo-european migration is pretty well traced, and there’s nothing (I’ve seen) going anywhere near Egypt.
There is 1 off examples of of white migration, like the 8000 year old Florida bog (windover site) people. And the 9000 year old Nevada Spirit cave man. The Smithsonian and local authorities have done their best to call these both Indians, which weren’t in the Americas for 1000s of years after this. But DNA did prove the Windover site. https://youtu.be/IfOZg3X_GmA
And even the Peruvian own ancient historical accounts claimed there was a white skinned king in the land when they got there.
Oh I agree that ancient egyptians were not all that.
And our ancestors did indeed travel the globe.
Its just they left little relics behind and died out.
Add to this, it's pretty clear that science is actively working to downplay the impact of whites in areas other Homo sapiens species have claimed as their own home land
But what strikes me is that Homo sapiens is 350000 years old but did t develop until whites came along Coincidence? Not to me
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 2 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 00:33:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:46:58 ago (+0/-0)
Ancient Egyptians were white and they were genocide.
Modern Egyptians are Arab rapists and they are very good at making male captives lose their balls and smashing skills of their fuck slaves mixed babies.
See why no niggers exist in Arabia despite taking tens of millions of black slaves
[ + ] Ragnar
[ - ] Ragnar 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 10:09:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic
[ - ] HonkyMcNiggerSpic 1 point 2.7 yearsOct 24, 2022 23:24:40 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ISlooshyYou
[ - ] ISlooshyYou 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 04:59:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 24, 2022 23:22:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 24, 2022 23:45:39 ago (+0/-0)
Looked white as fuck!
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 00:05:50 ago (+0/-0)*
Here's a photo of a lock of Abraham Lincoln's famous blonde hair.
https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/09/lincoln-hair.jpg
Over time pigments change. Soft tissues break up. And the only way you can determine what a mummy is racially, is either by DNA, or by measuring bones.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 01:47:46 ago (+0/-0)
Wait what? Blond haired Lincoln? Says who?
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo -1 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 02:08:39 ago (+0/-1)*
And, no, King tut's DNA wasn't White. Stop believing stupid shit. Closest thing you will find is a reference to haplotype R1a, which basically means he has a common ancestor with 50% of Europeans within 20,000 years ago.
Whites are only about 5,000 years old. (Battle Axe Culture).
Here's the thing that should convince you. Take a REAL White person. Plop him down in the Nile Delta. No malaria antibiotics. No air conditioning. No water purification. No modern conveniences. Come back a year later to visit his grave.
"HERE LIES LIAM McGEE. HE SHAT HIMSELF TO DEATH"
That's what happened to every White person to enter Africa before the 16th century. We are adapted for Forests and Fjords.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 02:24:42 ago (+0/-0)
Whites evolved 10k-30k years ago and spread throughout Europe. Anatolia. Levant and Egypt.
Ancient Egyptians have our fucking facial/cranium shape you fucking moron.
AE exhibited higher intelligence than any nigger.
Rameses 2 had red hair. As his pigments were studied under electron microscope.
We know AE had our DNA!
Our homelands have been shrinking for millenia.
You have to understand. Africa is split in two geographically.
Sahara desert plus the lower Nile.
Those north African lands were empty when AE arrived there.
Out of Africa is racist pos fake science
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 0 points 2.7 yearsOct 25, 2022 02:32:30 ago (+0/-0)
@Belfuro is clearly the guy you need to be asking questions. Hebrews are the REAL Whites! Fuck Malaria and Yellow fever. White people just hung out in the sun without any problems!
Clearly I'm wrong. This guy knows what he's talking about.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 25, 2022 23:32:16 ago (+0/-0)
You should try posting links to these kind of claims because there’s more then a small amount of historical record (and not main stream bullshit) tracking indo Europeans that doesn’t include these timelines at all.
Look at the indo european migration starting from the Yamnaya people. This is essentially (but not exactly) white history. Starting 1000 years before the Egyptian empire started, and the furthest south whites migrated was northern Turkey. At least in any noticeable numbers.
The entire Sumerian empire was between the indo Europeans and Egyptian empire at that time.
If you have something solid on whites (indo europeans) being that far south 10-30k years ago, you should post it.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 26, 2022 03:24:37 ago (+0/-0)
Which is very vague and not at all solid.
But four thousand years ago whites were egyptians.
Take the sumerians. Evidence is lacking but they appear to have been circassuans/Caucasians spread from Turkmenistan.
Which makes sense.
It was whites who developed civilization then spread it through example and inter breeding.
Alas these acts wipe us out. Today fewer than 1% of Egypt is related to ancient egyptians
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 27, 2022 01:15:13 ago (+0/-0)
Where have you seen evidence of this?
Without modern dna evidence, philology is the best indicator of race back then, and there’s no evidence I’ve seen of linguistic connections between indo Europeans and Egyptians. Or even indo europeans and the Sumerians between us and the Egyptians.
I’m not saying that it’s not possible for some small elite white class to have made it into those cultures, I’ve just never seen anything but fairly wild hearsay.
As far as civilization in general goes, I’m not sure why so many of us are desperate to associate ourselves with these other cultures. What Indo Europeans had on the step was far greater than what the egyptians had, or the Sumerians before them or the babylonians after them. We had the entire northern hemisphere to ourselves in a perfect “ethnostate”.
The best evidence I see for white influence in these empires isn’t there technology, it’s that their greatest technology was so far beyond the rest of their society that they didn’t even seem to know how to maintain good historical record of it.
Like, the pyramids are pretty amazing but the Egyptian empire peaked pretty quick, and didn’t advance much at all for like 1000 years cause they were to stupid to design a proper alphabet and language that could facilitate abstract thought and philosophical concept. So they were incapable of philosophical, technological and societal advancement. And there’s little to no record of them slowly advancing to the point of the pyramids. That kind of math and engineering should have shown itself in 1000s of other advancements, yet it just didn’t.
This on its own makes it seem highly likely of some outside influence, and I don’t mean aliens.
Yet the civilization before them, the Sumerians, seemed to do little else but design a language and some writing, which the Egyptians did little to advance.
Then the Babylonians after them, weren’t even close to as advanced as they were, and contributed almost nothing from there.
Like all these empires people envy were just glorified city states that managed to organize their slaves and plunder into a civilization 1 at a time when there was no competition. Seemingly just taking everything from their predecessors and relocating some of it.
Organization is really the best that can be said of these “empires”.
It wasn’t until the 8th century BC when whites put their first real mark on empire and truly built real civilization in the Greek empire.
And it literally became the birth place of the enlightenment, because it was the first European civilization.
And we did it specifically because we understood advanced abstract thought and conceived of the tools to achieve these things, which was alphabet and language.
I’m not religious, and don’t endorse E. Michael Jones generally, and I even came away from reading it with quite the opposite takeaway then he, I’m sure, intended. But his Logos book documents this EXTREMELY well ! And how the Greek philosophical progression invented science specifically by debunking Greek mythology but proving creation by a single eternal creator, purely through philosophy. Hense “the enlightenment”.
(Side note) imo Christianity was Jews co-opting the enlightenment. Because they seen mythology dismantled and science (cosmology) created by proving creation, and they co-opted it by attaching their Hebrew history to it with the saviour prophecy to create the big conversion event. And the Roman emperors went along with it because they’d known for 1000+ years that mythology is always needed for societal cohesion.
Forever perverting what would have been an actual enlightenment.
I get the draw to buy in to these accounts of empires always being white run, but you have to understand the progression of the indo Europeans first, and then have decent evidence of some branch going way off course, like Egypt. Not saying it’s impossible, but mummies and hair samples just aren’t enough without solid DNA.
And indo-european migration is pretty well traced, and there’s nothing (I’ve seen) going anywhere near Egypt.
There is 1 off examples of of white migration, like the 8000 year old Florida bog (windover site) people. And the 9000 year old Nevada Spirit cave man.
The Smithsonian and local authorities have done their best to call these both Indians, which weren’t in the Americas for 1000s of years after this. But DNA did prove the Windover site.
https://youtu.be/IfOZg3X_GmA
And even the Peruvian own ancient historical accounts claimed there was a white skinned king in the land when they got there.
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 28, 2022 01:04:12 ago (+0/-0)
And our ancestors did indeed travel the globe.
Its just they left little relics behind and died out.
Add to this, it's pretty clear that science is actively working to downplay the impact of whites in areas other Homo sapiens species have claimed as their own home land
But what strikes me is that Homo sapiens is 350000 years old but did t develop until whites came along
Coincidence? Not to me