×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
22

can this be confirmed?

submitted by boekanier to whatever 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 01:16:58 ago (+22/-0)     (u.smutty.horse)

https://u.smutty.horse/mjqiauisbbk.jpeg



12 comments block


[ - ] Ozark 3 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 01:45:58 ago (+3/-0)

All of the (((fact chechers))) say it's falsely attributed. Pattern recognition says that slimey jew bastard absolutely said this followed up by, "So, what's for lunch?".

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 10:15:29 ago (+2/-0)

So, what's for lunch?".

Baby fetus puree sir! Your favorite.

[ - ] Ozark 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 11, 2022 07:08:58 ago (+0/-0)

When you know that is the truth, it's kinda of hard to act normal.

[ - ] observation1 1 point 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 01:35:01 ago (+1/-0)

Hard to know.

First look to see if there existed a who council on eugenics, February 25, 2009.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 2 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 08:20:01 ago (+2/-0)

I had a look earlier at a bunch of things from 2009. The quote OP posted I found on an anti-vax blog, but I couldn't find any official WHO article, or media article about a "council on eugenics" or Henry Kissinger even attending a WHO event in 2009.

I'm going to call bullshit on the quote, even if all or part of it is what they're really doing. The political commissars, I mean "fact-checkers", are likely correct on this one.

[ - ] Sector7 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 17:34:18 ago (+0/-0)

Well, I'm not paying them, but the herd certainly needs some culling.

[ - ] rectangle 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 13:42:30 ago (+0/-0)

This speech is conveniently is missing from his website:

https://www.henryakissinger.com/speeches/page/2/

He supposedly said this on Feb 25, 2009; however, the first speech from 2009 published on his website is from April 26, 2009

Could be covering his tracks...

[ - ] judenhass 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 11:38:21 ago (+0/-0)

It's highly unlikely that he spelled it out in those terms, but if someone was to believe he did and end him for it, that would be neat.

[ - ] shitface9000 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 10:39:46 ago (+0/-0)

Can confirm i was there

[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 01:24:43 ago (+0/-0)

Would help to start with the where and when of the article itself.

He’s said a ton of shit over the years along those exact lines, but it sounds like a bit of paraphrasing to me.

[ - ] WhiteCollarCriminal 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 03:21:57 ago (+0/-0)

So let it be written, so let it be TRUE!

[ - ] shitface9000 0 points 2.6 yearsOct 10, 2022 10:40:38 ago (+0/-0)

Make it so