Sign into an existing account

Based on what I posted, I can’t and don’t want to argue with that. There is merit in that point as well.

Pretty much. Fantastic name by the way. I do find it interesting that some of our societal fairy tales seem to be warnings against the jew - Pinocchio having to learn not to behave like long nose liars and how to deal with the long nose elephants at the clown world circus being an obvious example. Teaching our kids about Santa and expecting them to figure out he's not real kinda seems like an anti-communist ritual. Then the jews tried to corrupt it with Rudolph, the guy with the funny nose who's going to lead the big red social credit system that decides who gets free stuff. Hopefully we've all figured out by now that communism is just our parents.

If all humans came from two people, we’d all be flipper armed, humpbacked ginger retards.

This is where a lot of the problems with the Christian bible occurs, literal vs figurative interpretation. The authors of the Bible where interpreted by questionable groups. Some important parts of the Bible where dropped. Certain ancient words were translated in questionable ways. There where some very nosey people interfering with biblical scholars. As far as I can tell those nosey people got their way.

Where did you hear this?

Paraphrasing all that into concise English all it says is


There's nothing deep about that, it's a simple threat. And just being in the Bible only means it's part of the religion, not that it's correct.

Did you know that Yaweh was originally a god among many and that he was the god of metalworking? This isn't disputed by anyone.

I appreciate your response and yes I think you understand my point.

I do have some thoughts on your explanation


I'm familiar with that being the standard interpretation, but if you really think about that statement you'll realize it's close to a paradox, or even like a nonsense statement that sounds deep because it can't be understood clearly because it negates itself in a circular way.

This technique is heavily used in Christianity for example the Trinity where Yaweh has become 3 things but is still 1 thing, or the concept of original sin. It makes almost enough sense that the brain thinks something is there but you get this sense of "This sounds deep but I don't quite get it" and opens you up to having someone explain it to you. It's similar to the sales tactic the Japanese used to (or maybe still use) with appliances where they would add lots of buttons and confusing features because it would give the impression that the product was really high tech.

It's not unique to Christianity by any means, it's pretty much a central feature in something like Zen Buddhism although used in a different way.

This is probably one reason non-Christians give certain reactions when being preached to by Christians. If you're not invested and "prepped" to see it as deep, then it can sound way more like a nonsense statement, although this particular one is easier to digest than some.

I consider the Christian statements around free will subversive mainly because of the connection to original sin (which is shockingly similar to the jewish "all Whites are born racist and we must forever atone for slavery" concept in the cult/religion of today's liberalism)

This makes perfect sense when you understand the part of history where Christianity was actively trying to convert a continent of White people to adopt it's way of thinking based on a moral imperative and appealing to the lower classes and the dregs of society and brokering the support of those groups to power seekers (kings and politicians) just as liberalism is today.

amen