Sign into an existing account

Thw traditional values of conservativism were established in the 40s and 50s.

They had changed since then to incorporate the progression that was brought in by the commies which erased the attitudes towards matters of race and sex conservatives had previously held.

They also made conservatives some of the strongest supporters of the laws of the mid 60s which erased the legal and political dominance of white men over women and blacks.

Basically, their ideas are as old as the religion of wicca, and given the same treatment too.

A relic of the 50s made out to be older than it truly was, and heavily modified to remove any positions that might offend the dominant culture of any era it exists in, while at the same time claiming to be some unshifting rock of lifestyle and morality.

The conservative traditionalists are posers, the only authentic seeming traditionalist is someone like varg.

I’ve known plenty of jews and I’ve seen plenty of data and I’ve never seen anything that led me to believe that they were not above average. So are european aristocrats, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t parasites.


Dear plodding little goy, try to stretch your literal mind. Jews have a unique, aggressive natural selection process because they are itinerants living within a host population. The host population of settled european peasants adapts much more slowly because a gene for being a better farmer will only become ubiquitous in that population when the carrier’s decendents replace most non-descendents, which is a hard slow process unless the gene confers a massive life-or-death benefit over non-carriers.

Not so with jews. Jews have genes for social parasitism. Some have alot of them, others not so much. Jews born with a lower propensity for social parasitism don’t have to die off to leave the population, they just drop out and assimilate in to the goyim. Jews intermarry with gentiles occassionally and if their hybrid offspring have enough of the “right stuff” for social parasitism, they stay within the jewry— and if they don’t , they assimilate in to the gentiles and become spaniards or italians or whatever. Because they are largely endogamous, they are always picking up new genes and casting off genes not suited for social parasitism.

It so happens that some of the traits that are useful for social parasitism are high IQ in certain areas— cultural intelligence including communication and psychological manipulation — useful for religion and law and rent seeking behaviors like mercantilism and usury— and also apparently math skills presumably for monetary reasons. They had no use for farming and building skills so they dont have them.

Their unusual genetic disorders all confer a cognitive benefit at the expense of physical fitness. They are an ADVANTAGE in the heterogeneous case if you are not a farmer or soldier and you have a desk job. It works like sickle cell in niggers.

They “cheated” their way to high IQs with tay sachs, gauchers, cystic fibrosis, and breast cancer genes. Read Gregory Cochran’s paper on AJ high intelligence.

Intelligence is trade offs. Jews sacrificed skills in several areas to get good at a few areas. And their advantage is real in those areas. And its more than just reading and writing.

Other traits that made them good at being social parasites are deceptive traits. They are truly convinced they are always being wronged by the host population so they “ cry out as they strike you”. That is a real behavioral trait that I would call a persectuion complex and I believe its predicted by “mafia hypothesis”. They are whiney rather than stoic and this is another opportunistic trait appropriate in children and sick and dying people and maybe women who depend on male bread winners but not healthy productive adult males. Its an opportunistic/parasitic strategy.

The point is, they collect and cast off genetic traits to suit their unique itinerant strategy at an accelerated rate compared to polish agrarians, because their cast offs don’t die— they join polish agrarians. Do you see how this selection process is more rapid than Polish agrarians’? Because polish agrarians don’t get rid of their underperformers by dumping them into the Russian population. They are stuck with them and they continue to reproduce.

It’s all about the same thing and it applies to niggers too. And gorillas. And penguins. Your high falutin morals are gene based behavioral instincts. Monogamy succeeds in cold climates and results in good dads and husbands whose reproductive success is contingent on providing well for their smaller families—ie work. Tropical populations succeed with polygamy where success is predicated on killing off the competition and fucking more hos. Hos fend for themselves by eating mangos all year long. That is why nigger morals are different and why nigger ethics are different and why nigger culture is different. All the same thing. Genes. Same with jews and muslims.

We attribute the religious TENETS (tenants?) to all sorts of fanciful shit (jesus wants this, zeus wants this) but our tenets come frome genes. Christian sects are influenced by the people who practice them. Presbyterianism is not the religion of Jesus and Paul any more than Zen Buddhism is the religion of Buddha or Hinduism is the religion of neolithic steppe herders.


In one sense of the word perhaps. Conservative jews and muslims are conserving their traditional economic strategy ( polygynous warlording in the case of muslims, grifter of gentiles for the conservative jews that reject moving to israel and supporting their own economy) But both these strategies are inherently parasitic and not sustainable because they are totally non-productive and parasitic off other groups. That is not economically truly conservative. Conservative is when everyone is economically productive in a society and individuals are compensated based on what they can produce that is objectively valuable and does not cause negative outcomes to the larger society. If we eliminate social parasitism and reproductive success is tied to productivity (not exploitation) , we have created a eugenic regime. A conservative parasite is not economically conservative. Its inefficient. Stricter rules against inefficient behavior and exploitation— such as gold bricking, reckless unsanctioned reproduction, vices and pleasure seeking behaviors (no dancing to jew music in Footloose town) lead to higher productivity and higher trust. In other words, nice countries. East asians have strict morals and so do northern eurasians— behaviors that promote efficiency at the expense of selfish pleasure seeking.

The most indulgent groups— countries where the people “enjoy life” and are “not stressed out all the time “ and are “not ashamed of their bodies” and make love at the drop of a hat are all shit countries. Countries where they love to eat and sing and dance and are “hospitable” and gregarious are all corrupt and violent.

Thats why southern europe is more fun and also worse than northern europe. Same with southeast asia and northeast asia. Party people are inefficient. Stoic repressed cultures where inefficient behaviors are restricted have the best genes, the best productivity, high intelligence and nice countries with high egalitarianism.


Wel really both are true. I suppose you might call the first natural selection and the second “genetic drift”, but they are really the same thing. The first is just a more dramatic or rapid adaptation perhaps in the context of a major selection event. I dont know if heroes is a good example because I dont know how they explain the propagation of these genes to the heroes in the first place. Genes for supernatural powers will not arise spontaneously in separate individuals because “it’s the next step in evolution”. Thats just a gay trope.


The ancient Romans and Greeks de-evolved into the modern italians and greeks. The egyptians. The point is not whether we the white race survive in some form but whether we end up acting like jews or italians or niggers. These are dysgeneic times. The cold harsh winters of the paleolithic, mesolithic, and neolithic carved the white race. Those selectiv e pressures are gone. Entropy is the predictable outcome unless we impose “artificial “ selection pressure which are eugenic and irl this looks like a moral regime. It doesnt have to be Jesus. But theoretically it could be. It has been for the amish. They are eugenic af.

We are reinstituting prohibition— it was a good policy that was foiled by jews and you are just regurgitating the bullshit propagit they used to rewrite history.


Just what jews said about faggotry and look where we are.


Yeah maybe we should legalize murder and heroin and screwing kids too. Lets just have no rules.

So glad you are over that despicable body shaming episode earlier, sweet cheeks. Give that bountiful bottom a squeeze for me.