That was edited but I saw that a couple of years ago. A woman was trying to get him to apologize for not recognizing global warming and Dan went off on her.
I would point out that they would find a way to rake the buyer over the coals some more by requiring climate change mortgage insurance or some similar nonsense to cover their loss in the event of sea rise, kind of like they do now with flood insurance.
I agree with Peña in principle, but banks make money either way. Its like college loans for retards getting $250k in African mud hut studies. Theres some gov enforcement when the loan inevitably fails
Yes money is power but for a man of conscience to channel every energy to acquiring more of it to the point that there is never such a thing as enough is a kind of suicide. It requires a complete neglect of so many impulses that are required to maintain a well rounded and full spirit and the type of man who is driven solely by materialism will likely not be inclined to change the world in any way other than to maximize his profits. I’m not anti capitalistic I’m just saying that Pena’s impulse is not some deep fundamental drive that everyone poses. Embracing the shadow is unique to everyone.
If enough people point that out it will stop. When others go around poking enough holes in the narrative those who push it rush to plug up those holes. For example when everyone noticed that misdeeds reported by the media include the white race whenever possible while excluding race when its a black perpetrator they permitted a few token blacks to have their race mentioned. I recall one event that looked artificial as can be. They withheld mentioning race for a while, someone accused them of what they normally do, then the race was mentioned and the one person who mentioned how MSM normally is was heavily mocked.
1. You want people to invest, so you're not going to put negatives in the brochure
2. The bank doesn't give a shit if you lose your shirt, you're still on the hook and they are still making money because YOU created the money they lent you when you took on the liability to make repayments for the loan
I was thinking the same thing. The banks don’t want to really hold any assets. They’ll lend you money, let your shit go under water literally or figuratively and then have you as a debt serf for the rest of your natural life or until your bankruptcy claim is approved.
The banks want liquid assets with the best case scenario for them is you defaulting on your property title with the life debt (mortgage), then they keep your money and your material asset as the bank owns your house until you pay for it. Its win, win for them.
If there was a risk of the house ending up in the sea and they gave a customer a mortgage, the customer could default on the loan and the bank would be unable to requisition the property because it would be gone. So now the bank would be out of pocket the cost of the loan that could not be repaid.
No bank would offer a mortgage if there was the potential for destruction to the material asset. Already here in Australia, many banks will not finance houses in natural flood plains due to these reports indicating a likelihood of material damage from nature.
That London Reel guy sitting next to him is the most mercantile skeeming guy on the web. Literally running a scam selling shares to his YouTube channel….. that YouTube owns.
[ + ] 2Drunk
[ - ] 2Drunk 17 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 10:53:20 ago (+17/-0)
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 8 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 11:09:15 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 12:39:54 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] RobertJHarsh
[ - ] RobertJHarsh 7 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 12:51:07 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] Belfuro
[ - ] Belfuro 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 01:46:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 5 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 11:43:49 ago (+6/-1)
[ + ] La_Chalupacabra
[ - ] La_Chalupacabra 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 16:56:51 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 13:51:00 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 23:18:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] eongoat
[ - ] eongoat 5 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 13:08:57 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 16:45:27 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 20:00:11 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 05:41:12 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 05:46:39 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 11:46:04 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] AtomicForeskin
[ - ] AtomicForeskin 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 18:36:50 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 19:05:27 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] AtomicForeskin
[ - ] AtomicForeskin 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 19:35:23 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Doglegwarrior
[ - ] Doglegwarrior 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 13:20:19 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 16:27:16 ago (+2/-0)
For example when everyone noticed that misdeeds reported by the media include the white race whenever possible while excluding race when its a black perpetrator they permitted a few token blacks to have their race mentioned.
I recall one event that looked artificial as can be. They withheld mentioning race for a while, someone accused them of what they normally do, then the race was mentioned and the one person who mentioned how MSM normally is was heavily mocked.
[ + ] Zyklonbeekeeper
[ - ] Zyklonbeekeeper 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 12:10:36 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] WanderingToast
[ - ] WanderingToast 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 17:10:50 ago (+1/-0)
1. You want people to invest, so you're not going to put negatives in the brochure
2. The bank doesn't give a shit if you lose your shirt, you're still on the hook and they are still making money because YOU created the money they lent you when you took on the liability to make repayments for the loan
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 18:52:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 29, 2022 05:53:09 ago (+0/-0)
The banks want liquid assets with the best case scenario for them is you defaulting on your property title with the life debt (mortgage), then they keep your money and your material asset as the bank owns your house until you pay for it. Its win, win for them.
If there was a risk of the house ending up in the sea and they gave a customer a mortgage, the customer could default on the loan and the bank would be unable to requisition the property because it would be gone. So now the bank would be out of pocket the cost of the loan that could not be repaid.
No bank would offer a mortgage if there was the potential for destruction to the material asset. Already here in Australia, many banks will not finance houses in natural flood plains due to these reports indicating a likelihood of material damage from nature.
[ + ] Clubberlang
[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 11:08:56 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 28, 2022 23:48:01 ago (+0/-0)
Literally running a scam selling shares to his YouTube channel….. that YouTube owns.