Sign into an existing account

Ask him if he is from voat?

Common wisdom is that it's better to ignore someone who insults or otherwise offends you.

But the truly wise know that retaliation is the better option.

White people are uniquely evil because we never retaliate when they say those things about us.

We are also violent, because there's no fear of retaliation for characterizing us that way.

We get slandered and attacked and discriminated against amd robbed for gibs all because we allowed it, because we avoided confrontation.

Our lack of retaliation told the world that there was no penalty for just doing whatever they liked toward us, and that is why our culture and society is the way it is today.

We did this to ourselves, I'm trying to be some wise stoic figures who ignore the slings and arrows of lesser men, we have instead become the designated punching bags and doormats of the world.

We have neglected our duties to ourselves out of a misguided modern form of wisdom that we have chosen out of cowardice and naivety.

You don't become good by being good, or peaceful by being peaceful, if you want to be perceived as these things, you need to shut the mouths of those who say you aren't by making them regret doing so so consistently that it's the expected response.

The real world is dog eat dog, the weak dog is dinner for the rest, and being given these labels of being evil or dangerous is just a tool that makes it easier for the other dogs to chow down on you.

Calling you selfish is just a way for them to justify it when they steal from you.

Ultimately, words and actions themselves are meaningless, what matters is goals, people will say or do whatever it takes to get what they want and every word or deed must therefore be measured by the benefit they may present to the people engaging in them.

What do they ultimately seek to achieve? Once you know that, you can predict their next move at any time.

If you want to succeed, you should do likewise to what these people do, if you have a goal you truly wish to see achieved, you must find what you need to say or do to make that happen.

Forget the acts themselves, forget the words you say, they are irrelevant, you will need to keep up all manner of pretenses in order to get anything done in this world.

It may take a series of smaller steps to get to the desired ends, if the ends is currently unpalatable to the dominant culture, you must make each smaller goal something that is socially acceptable to advocate for by the eyes of a sufficient portion of the population.

Most importantly here, is that you must conceal your true ultimate destination from your supporters and give your detractors as little to prove their suspicions about you with as possible.

If you want racial supremacy, and your race is in a state of inferiority, you have to first pass the hurdle of attaining equality, present racial equality as your desired end and advocate only for that, at first.

Know that later on you can segway your cause into demanding resources be handed over as compensation for any mistreatment your people had suffered.

This can include positions of authority in key locations within your society, places of power that you can then use to make policies that have the benefit of your people in mind above all else.

Then on to stamping out all criticism of your claims under the guise of fighting "hate" against your people.

It also provides cover for your power grabbing and policy making.

You can achieve the separation of your people from the others by demanding a "space" for your "community" (good for the safe indoctrination of a race oriented view into your kids).

You can shift the perception of your race by now securely being able to spread a view of history, both recent and not, where your people are oppressed and beneficial to the world, while others are oppressive and detrimental, your people and suffered and improved the world, other people had been the cause of your suffering and contributed nothing.

For this part all you have to do is cherry pick which parts of history are presented, and carefully manage the parts of those events that are shown, so as to present your people as positively as possible (and being a victim is a very positive trait for the purposes of this conversation, since it provides advantages and a license for aggressive advocacy today), while presenting other races as neutral or negatively (in modern times, being an "oppressor" is a negative trait, as it provides sociocultural disadvantages and impairs the ability of a people to aggressively advocate for their own).

As culture gradually shifts, it becomes more acceptable to be more biased in favor of your people than it is to have any view that puts your people's political dominance at a disadvantage.

There is only really one way that change can be achieved peacefully in a western country, no matter what you are advocating for, the process is the same.

You won't be able to find another way, unless you are willing to entertain politics by other means, and most political groups in the western world had indeed used that alongside the more peaceful methods described above to strengthen and supplement their approach (while being careful to avoid having both styles of fostering change being linked together in the public consciousness as coming from the same people).

The peaceful methods assist the other kind of method more achievable, they make gathering numbers and organizing collective action easier, they also run cover for the more extreme activities you could engage in to allow the people to adopt a more sympathetic view of them.

For example, the more aware people are of how mistreated you've been, the more they would look at your more destructive acts as am understandable retaliation or lashing out rather than as just a destructive force that should be put down and prevented from breaking out again.

If they see you committing acts to intimidate your way into getting something you want, and their response is to agree that you should get what you desire, and reccomend it being given to you as the means of preventing a future outbreak of intimidating conduct, then you know you've done of good job in ensuring your actions would be framed in a favorable light.

Okay final point for real now, if you get the people to accept some small concession or change, the culture will be more receptive to making further changes of the same direction in the future, so wince the ball get rolling, you can go from one small goal to the next at an accelerating pace.

Just make sure that each goal is presented by itself, and that each of them is something that could be easily argued to be understandable, just, and intrinsically harmless.

Every step along the way must be shown as if it were the final one.

Patience wins out in the end, it may take more more one generation, but your grandchildren will carry on your fight for you if you condition them to do so.

The point is that your goal is achieved eventually.

“Oh sweet, you hate faggots to?”

“Uhh course”

“Great, I guess we can be friends after all”

For full context...
During the conversation, @GrayDragon said he would remove any question about his absolute faggotry and give the accuser a "wet willie" with the tip of his dick.

1 my time is valuable, won't waste it on the unworthy.

Depends on my mood really. Mostly just walking away because I don't care, especially about random niggers on the street.

4. "Nigger".

I would laugh my ass off and keep walking. Whatever shit I gots to do is moar important than this faggot.

4 Ignore him and continue on my way, but I am a bit bothered by what just happened.

Ignore him because I have other important things to do and they're so far above the level of that person that possibly risking my life in any interaction with him would be lowering myself to such a degree it would be a waste. Furthermore the guys such an idiot that it wouldn't bother me at all. I'm reminded of that one great scene in mad Men in the elevator. The underlying talks to Don and tells him how he thinks about how he pities Don for this that and the other reason. And then Don looks at him and says "I don't think about you at all."

That's how much this wouldn't bother me.

The way of the stoics- if someone mis-judges, it is that person that is a fool.
But in this case, the passer-by would have been correct in his assessment.

Start screeching that he's a pedophile and "christ-cuck".

I was in a very short bar fight. I confronted a con man who had stolen or cost my friend and his family 500k about. I said some shit to him he got in my face and poked me<<< aka simple assault. I punched him. It lasted about 5 seconds.

Guy is a con man goes all out presses charges I take it all the way to court and lose... still can't believe what the two older men on that jury where thinking. They even said in questioning after the trial I did nothing wrong but the way the judge and prosecution told them what their duty was they caved... I hate those pussys more then the conman.

Anyways long story short cost me my airbnb cost me being a lyft driver cost me around 14k total lawyer and all the other nonsense.. I got falsly put on some list I can't buy guns until I resolve it<<< it is insanely complicated to resolve I have enough guns already anyways.

So if some guy called me a faggot which I am not I would just say have a good day even if I won the fight I lose the fight

except foo is a larping kike

So even if he gets to be right on this "argument" he's still a kike with kike inbred DNA so does he really "Win" at the end of the day?

No, no he does not, that kike should be deported he isn't welcome in White countries anymore

No kike is

"same to you, faggot!!"

I'd be satisfied with a simple retort unless the situation was more critical.

I'd just say shut up nigger and keep going.

GayDrag out for a quick survey @GrayDragon

Do you get to know if insultor is armed?

Ignore the individual.

You shouldn't interact with: crazy people, people suddenly prompting you, and especially people whom you do not know.

The problems you invite are innumerable, and your life ought not be degraded for strangers in the street.

Don't know you failed to mention wether he said it towards you or someone standing near you.

He could have been having a conversation with a friend or on a phone.

Know the facts before you react.

In a city - Option 4.

The first 2 are not options as it can paint you a target.

Option 3 is too high risk as you could be dealing with a bitter or someone looking for an excuse.

Best bet is to bat it back with equal force, neither escalating or minimizing - perhaps via humour.

E.g.

Nah I stayed at home last night, so it can't have been me you met at the gay bar

But do so without dropping your stride

Probably become very angry after walking for a few more moments. Likely turn around and try to find them again to smash them with some makeshift weapon before realizing that them calling me a faggot was perfect and the favor should be passed on to multiple others.

shoot first

Ask questions later

Ignore him because the normies get upset when I snap a retard.