Who the fuck comes across evidence like that, and doesn’t immediately share the original and the who, What, when, where, why and how they came across it??
Everyone knows a 180ft wide jet liner managed to make a perfectly round 20ft wide hole in the Pentagon some how. Ya ya blah blah.
Who the fuck did this footage come from? Where is the original? Why is it such a short clip? Where’s the rest?
This video means nothing in an attempt to convince retarded normies without an iron clad chain of custody of the evidence itself.
[ - ] qwop 1 point 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 08:41:44 ago (+1/-0)
This is zoomed in blurry version of a doctored video that has made the rounds here and elsewhere regularly. It's bullshit. I've looked into this before and found both the original and the doctored versions. This is just a rehash of the same old clip.
Calm yourself child The view from the other parking lot camera is much better. Most were seen 20 years ago. The vaporizing tower vids are also still available
Of course it was a missile. The cruise missile was retaliation against the Pentagon for having punched two planes into the Trade Center. Missile hits Pentagon, attacks against civilians stops.
If you believe that planes hit the Towers but a missile hit the Pentagon, then the simplest explanation for the time line, order of events, is that the Pentagon missile was retaliation by a second actor.
it also implies a line of communications of some sort, perhaps unconventional, between the opposing factions. That's a crazy interesting angle. Has this been proposed with context anywhere or your own theory?
I'm not discounting the destruction of financial records theory because I used to consider that plausible also. But, you'd have to also believe that the those records were only held in paper form, not electronic or duplicated elsewhere, and that the Pentagon somehow obtained all those original, or paper copies of originals, from Bush.
KISS. Two "planes" strike the Towers with additional planes enroute to their targets. One missile counterstrikes into the Pentagon and the initial plane assaults stops. No more planes into buildings.
Whoever was behind the plane strikes was not the same actor behind the missile strike.
That the missile was a counterstrike against the planes seems the most plausible.
You start destroying my infrastructure so I take out your command center. Battles stops.
do you have any theories on the identities or organizations in play in that scenario?
like are we talking, DC vs NYC? Patriots vs Deep State? Muslims vs The Cubs? any names/faces? What about the angle of the tower owners benefiting financially?
My wonder is: in your setup, who are the 2 parties?
The missile was launched from a US Navy submarine.
Whomever made that decision would be on record.
One would hope the Pentagon target was specific to the protagonists office or department, but I suspect these people, both sides, don't tally body count by counting with their fingers.
DOD vs DOD. Easy to cover up the crime when attacker and defender are the same.
I have no idea if it could be true or not, but that is an insanely interesting perspective. Should write a book and self publish, probably make millions
That one woman who speaks of 'dustification' I find her analysis of the problem of weight and mass very interesting. It was stated that had the towers mass impacted the ground, as would be expected, it would have registered much higher richter scale readings and according to her, would have shattered the ground below and flooded the area.
her big "ie:" was that they did not hit the ground, because they were vaporized by a Directed Energy Weapon. Its really weird cuz before hearing that, you just see falling buildings, but watch the same videos again and you see a building being "dustified"
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 7 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 01:48:33 ago (+7/-0)
Everyone knows a 180ft wide jet liner managed to make a perfectly round 20ft wide hole in the Pentagon some how. Ya ya blah blah.
Who the fuck did this footage come from?
Where is the original?
Why is it such a short clip?
Where’s the rest?
This video means nothing in an attempt to convince retarded normies without an iron clad chain of custody of the evidence itself.
[ + ] GlowNiggerDick
[ - ] GlowNiggerDick 1 point 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 07:38:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] qwop
[ - ] qwop 1 point 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 08:41:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 10:19:14 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 10:22:15 ago (+0/-0)
The view from the other parking lot camera is much better.
Most were seen 20 years ago.
The vaporizing tower vids are also still available
[ + ] totes_magotes
[ - ] totes_magotes 4 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 06:56:06 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 20, 2022 00:17:51 ago (+0/-0)
grandpa was right... about everything.
[ + ] Special_Prosecutor
[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 3 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 01:45:10 ago (+3/-0)
Missile hits Pentagon, attacks against civilians stops.
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 3 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 03:32:30 ago (+3/-0)
and I've heard some odd ones.
[ + ] Special_Prosecutor
[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 1 point 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 16:24:51 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 20, 2022 00:11:41 ago (+0/-0)
That's a crazy interesting angle. Has this been proposed with context anywhere or your own theory?
[ + ] Special_Prosecutor
[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 20, 2022 04:13:07 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 11:27:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Special_Prosecutor
[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 13:57:39 ago (+0/-0)
KISS. Two "planes" strike the Towers with additional planes enroute to their targets.
One missile counterstrikes into the Pentagon and the initial plane assaults stops. No more planes into buildings.
Whoever was behind the plane strikes was not the same actor behind the missile strike.
That the missile was a counterstrike against the planes seems the most plausible.
You start destroying my infrastructure so I take out your command center. Battles stops.
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 20, 2022 00:15:11 ago (+0/-0)
like are we talking, DC vs NYC? Patriots vs Deep State? Muslims vs The Cubs? any names/faces? What about the angle of the tower owners benefiting financially?
My wonder is: in your setup, who are the 2 parties?
[ + ] Special_Prosecutor
[ - ] Special_Prosecutor 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 20, 2022 04:06:08 ago (+0/-0)
Whomever made that decision would be on record.
One would hope the Pentagon target was specific to the protagonists office or department, but I suspect these people, both sides, don't tally body count by counting with their fingers.
DOD vs DOD. Easy to cover up the crime when attacker and defender are the same.
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 1 point 2.7 yearsSep 20, 2022 10:35:02 ago (+1/-0)
Should write a book and self publish, probably make millions
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 07:08:56 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 01:57:50 ago (+3/-2)
https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=627422e45b757
Why are you linking to a Qtard forum? Are you a Qtard?
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 07:59:29 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 20, 2022 00:16:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 20, 2022 07:18:06 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] thoughtcryme
[ - ] thoughtcryme 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 20, 2022 10:39:18 ago (+0/-0)
It was stated that had the towers mass impacted the ground, as would be expected, it would have registered much higher richter scale readings and according to her, would have shattered the ground below and flooded the area.
her big "ie:" was that they did not hit the ground, because they were vaporized by a Directed Energy Weapon.
Its really weird cuz before hearing that, you just see falling buildings, but watch the same videos again and you see a building being "dustified"
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsSep 20, 2022 13:39:58 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 02:12:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Thatguy
[ - ] Thatguy 0 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 00:46:35 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 8 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 00:55:06 ago (+8/-0)
[ + ] Thatguy
[ - ] Thatguy -1 points 2.8 yearsSep 19, 2022 01:07:33 ago (+0/-1)