Space is fake and promoted through jewish mediums and institutions.
If you deny this simple fact you will never break free of the kike brainwashing.
The moon landings were faked by the same government institutions that wiped out the NSDAP/Germany and blamed Hitler with a fake holocaust.
If you fail to understand how much power and control is necessary to pull this of on an international scale, then of course there is no way you would ever be able to comprehend how they are able to shape the literal worldview into the minds of the masses. You might as well be just another sheep, too ignorant to understand how the power dynamics of the people who control and rule over you truly works.
"It is also a fact that the horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained."
Directly refuted in the video I linked. The drone gains altitude and the horizon drops. Flattards ignore evidence as usual.
"It is a fact, not a theory, that we are able to observe objects at incredibly long distances far beyond what would be possible if Earth were a globe."
Except for THE SUN when it sets below the horizon, from bottom to top, exactly as you would expect on a spherical Earth. Furthermore, as the video I linked shows, you can bring the sun back into view by gaining altitude with a drone.
Flattards ignore reality again.
"It is an observable, testable, repeatable, scientific fact of reality that Polaris, the north pole star, situated perfectly over the north pole center of Earth, never moves a single inch."
More bullshit from the Flattard King. Polaris isn't situated perfectly at the north pole axis, and can be seen to make star trails: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVTLDtaQSL8
And, of course, there's also the southern stars that rotate around the south pole, which makes no sense in Flattard Land, but makes perfect sense on a spherical Earth. Flattards in complete denial of reality.
Directly refuted in the video I linked. The drone gains altitude and the horizon drops. Flattards ignore evidence as usual.
Incorrect. The horizon always remains in the center of the frame of the camera. At no point does the visible horizon drop below the center of frame/eye level.
The drone gains altitude and the horizon drops.
The drone gains altitude and the horizon stays in the center of frame. It doesn't drop at all.
Furthermore, as the video I linked shows, you can bring the sun back into view by gaining altitude with a drone.
Which is a property of limited perspective on a flat, horizontal plane. When you rise in altitude you can see further. You can also zoom in to the sun the bring the sunset back into view, until a certain distance in which the sun can no longer throw its light through the density of the atmosphere.
This is physically impossible under the heliocentric model of the Earth orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph while rotating at 1000mph. How do you explain the stars orbits staying in tandem from "billions of lightyears" away?
And, of course, there's also the southern stars that rotate around the south pole
The horizon always remains in the center of the frame of the camera.
Flattard in denial of his own eyes and reality again. The center is marked by the yellow reticle. The horizon starts out on the reticle, and then drops below it as the drone rises.
You flattards are so pathetic.
Which is a property of limited perspective on a flat, horizontal plane. When you rise in altitude you can see further.
This is a property of a spherical Earth, not Flattard Land. You have line of sight to infinity on the horizon on a flat plane. Anything above the plane is visible.
If the sun was receding as flattards claim, zooming in would bring it back into view, but it doesn't. It's directly blocked by the horizon, and sets from bottom to top, exactly as you would expect on spherical Earth. In Flattard Land, the entire disk of the sun would get smaller and smaller, but the entire disk would always be visible.
Furthermore, the auto-tracking mount clearly shows the path of the sun as it falls below the horizon.
You can also zoom in to the sun the bring the sunset back into view
This is been proven false in the video I linked. A zoomed in shot does not bring the sun back into view. It's still bright when it falls below the horizon. The disk never shrinks. You are retarded.
Flattard is retarded and tries to hand wave away straight lines, geometry, and angles. "So if we add perspective lines we get a completely different picture." No, retard, you can't just "add perspective lines". That's what you're trying to figure out with the original geometry. When you do the math using Flattard models, it doesn't match reality, because the Earth isn't flat. Sunsets behave exactly like you would expect on a spherical Earth.
"So in this next slide here I'm going to superimpose these perspective lines over on top of this. The way they're representing the sun as staying parallel to the ground is not correct."
Retarded. The sun being parallel to the ground is the starting flattard assumption. The geometry and math shows you how the angle decreases from the observer's perspective. And the angle is clearly shown to decrease in the diagram. But it doesn't match what we actually see in reality.
Furthermore, from the sun to go from noon overhead to sunset by moving away, it would have to appear to shrink DRASTICALLY in size from the perspective of the observer. The disk of the sun never changes in size when viewed without glare (many flattard videos use glare as a means of deception).
Perfectly demonstrates how the stars are circling our flat plane with Polaris fixed to the north pole. Nice proof
Flattard again denies his own eyes and reality. Polaris is not "fixed" to the North pole as claimed by Eric the Flattard King and parroted by you. It clearly traces out a circle just like all the other stars. Another flattard claim busted with trivial observation.
How do you explain the stars orbits staying in tandem from "billions of lightyears" away?
If you weren't so retarded, you'd know. They only appear to orbit because the Earth is rotating. Their relative positions appear fixed in the sky because they are so far away. I've explained this to you before you changed accounts.
Ad hoc gibberish for the gullible rubes by the Flattard King. Does it even make sense to them? No, they don't try to understand what he's saying. It's just a video they can point to.
Challenge: Find a video of the stars behaving as the four spheres do. Explain why there are four spheres.
Absolutely nothing makes sense on a ball earth.
The southern pole and stars are trivially explained by a spherical Earth. Sunsets are trivially explained by a spherical Earth. They make no sense in Flattard Land. There are no predictive flattard maps. None are used for navigation or to predict they sky above for any time and place on Earth. These are all exquisitely and trivially mapped using a spherical Earth.
Flattards do nothing but throw feces at the zookeepers.
We fundamentally understand that water always finds it's level and requires a container.
People are indoctrinated to believe that water magically curves due to a supernatural force called "gravity" in which the scale to perform any experiment on is to be considered "too big for the human mind to comprehend" and the scientists behind such dogmatic scientism are to be considered infallible.
Can you please tell me the flight time between L.A. and Melbourne on the flat Earth map? Can you then explain the discrepancy between the actual flight time?
I want you to explain it. I want you to type it out.
Flight paths make more sense on a flat earth model then a globe model, especially when you take into account earths mythical spin of 1000mph eastwards. Meaning that planes flying west would have to compete with this nonsensical rotation but they don't because earth isn't a tilted, wobbling, spinning ball.
Your reliance on videos shows you do not understand the basic principles.
From now on, nobody here is allowed to use videos. Everyone has to type out the answers in long winded paragraphs because we know how sane those posts appear to look.
But carry on, what other excuses have you got? The video answered your question sufficiently. Now how about you answer a simple ball question?
How many flat horizons does it take to shape a ball with the circumference of 25,000 miles?
Horizons are flat. Not curved. Have to really hammer this point into the head of globetards that genuinely believe that spheres can have straight lines on them. No matter what the size of the sphere is, you wouldn't have a flat horizon at eye level. It would be displaying the slightest convexity as well as never reaching eye level. Especially if you elevated yourself up on the ball, say on a mountain. The horizon should be well below eye level and be curving away at 8 inches per mile squared.
You really do not have the slightest idea wtf you're talking about.
This is the same response that leftists espouse when they are shown facts that question the narratives in their head.
Every single person ever born was a flat earther before being indoctrinated into the belief of living on a ball. This indoctrination takes place through various mediums, mainly mainstream media and school institutions. These same institutions are responsible for peddling the holohoax, climate hoax, gender hoax, black lives matter hoax e.t.c.
You faggots are no different to the modern leftist. You think you aren't an NPC like them but your just at a different level within the kike matrix. You broke free of one part but remain stuck in the next part.
What part of this are you struggling to understand?
Horizons are flat. Not curved.
Fact. Horizons are flat, level, straight, zero degree's of measurable curvature to it. No matter if you are a few feet of the ground of 121,000 ft of the ground. Flat, level, straight horizon.
"How many flat horizons does it take to shape a ball with the circumference of 25,000 miles?"
25,000 miles in circumference is the accepted claim of the size of ball earth. This figure will never and can never change.
Now, in case you missed grade 1 basic geometry about shapes, edges and faces. You should be familiar with the fact that a sphere/ball has no edges, no faces and no vertices.
On the surface of a sphere, however, there are no straight lines.
Balls are curved and have ZERO straight lines to them. The curvature of the ball earth is 8 inches per mile squared. This is formulated using basic spherical trigonometry and the claimed circumference of 25,000 miles.
So, how many flat, level, straight horizons does it take to shape a ball?
I did answer his question, indoctrinated globetard.
Flight paths make more sense on a flat earth model then a globe model, especially when you take into account earths mythical spin of 1000mph eastwards. Meaning that planes flying west would have to compete with this nonsensical rotation but they don't because earth isn't a tilted, wobbling, spinning ball.
How do Flights Like Sydney-Santiago Work on Flat Earth?
They only work on a flat earth model. Globe believers fail to leave out the supposed rotation of earth at 1000mph. How would an airplane even land at a northward facing landing strip if the object it is trying to land on is rotating at 1000mph?
Absolutely nothing about the ball earth model makes any sense at all.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 23:47:04 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 00:13:57 ago (+1/-3)
If you deny this simple fact you will never break free of the kike brainwashing.
The moon landings were faked by the same government institutions that wiped out the NSDAP/Germany and blamed Hitler with a fake holocaust.
If you fail to understand how much power and control is necessary to pull this of on an international scale, then of course there is no way you would ever be able to comprehend how they are able to shape the literal worldview into the minds of the masses. You might as well be just another sheep, too ignorant to understand how the power dynamics of the people who control and rule over you truly works.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 03:41:38 ago (+3/-0)*
[ + ] gaybeeye
[ - ] gaybeeye -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 10:36:42 ago (+0/-3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c86PiRsOuGU
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 22:02:08 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 22:23:36 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 23:33:10 ago (+3/-0)
Directly refuted in the video I linked. The drone gains altitude and the horizon drops. Flattards ignore evidence as usual.
Except for THE SUN when it sets below the horizon, from bottom to top, exactly as you would expect on a spherical Earth. Furthermore, as the video I linked shows, you can bring the sun back into view by gaining altitude with a drone.
Flattards ignore reality again.
More bullshit from the Flattard King. Polaris isn't situated perfectly at the north pole axis, and can be seen to make star trails: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVTLDtaQSL8
And, of course, there's also the southern stars that rotate around the south pole, which makes no sense in Flattard Land, but makes perfect sense on a spherical Earth. Flattards in complete denial of reality.
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 00:05:46 ago (+1/-2)
Incorrect. The horizon always remains in the center of the frame of the camera. At no point does the visible horizon drop below the center of frame/eye level.
The drone gains altitude and the horizon stays in the center of frame. It doesn't drop at all.
Which is a property of limited perspective on a flat, horizontal plane. When you rise in altitude you can see further. You can also zoom in to the sun the bring the sunset back into view, until a certain distance in which the sun can no longer throw its light through the density of the atmosphere.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtttUIElngI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0Gx1vD1CRE
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvFM9JwMDaM
Perfectly demonstrates how the stars are circling our flat plane with Polaris fixed to the north pole. Nice proof
https://files.catbox.moe/0g5970.jpg
This is physically impossible under the heliocentric model of the Earth orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph while rotating at 1000mph. How do you explain the stars orbits staying in tandem from "billions of lightyears" away?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADNeFSuKnqM
Absolutely nothing makes sense on a ball earth.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:56:08 ago (+2/-0)
Flattard in denial of his own eyes and reality again. The center is marked by the yellow reticle. The horizon starts out on the reticle, and then drops below it as the drone rises.
You flattards are so pathetic.
This is a property of a spherical Earth, not Flattard Land. You have line of sight to infinity on the horizon on a flat plane. Anything above the plane is visible.
If the sun was receding as flattards claim, zooming in would bring it back into view, but it doesn't. It's directly blocked by the horizon, and sets from bottom to top, exactly as you would expect on spherical Earth. In Flattard Land, the entire disk of the sun would get smaller and smaller, but the entire disk would always be visible.
Furthermore, the auto-tracking mount clearly shows the path of the sun as it falls below the horizon.
This is been proven false in the video I linked. A zoomed in shot does not bring the sun back into view. It's still bright when it falls below the horizon. The disk never shrinks. You are retarded.
Notice how the person shrinks when walking away. But the disk of the sun does not when setting below the horizon. It just drops below the horizon.
Flattard is retarded and tries to hand wave away straight lines, geometry, and angles. "So if we add perspective lines we get a completely different picture." No, retard, you can't just "add perspective lines". That's what you're trying to figure out with the original geometry. When you do the math using Flattard models, it doesn't match reality, because the Earth isn't flat. Sunsets behave exactly like you would expect on a spherical Earth.
"So in this next slide here I'm going to superimpose these perspective lines over on top of this. The way they're representing the sun as staying parallel to the ground is not correct."
Retarded. The sun being parallel to the ground is the starting flattard assumption. The geometry and math shows you how the angle decreases from the observer's perspective. And the angle is clearly shown to decrease in the diagram. But it doesn't match what we actually see in reality.
Furthermore, from the sun to go from noon overhead to sunset by moving away, it would have to appear to shrink DRASTICALLY in size from the perspective of the observer. The disk of the sun never changes in size when viewed without glare (many flattard videos use glare as a means of deception).
Flattard again denies his own eyes and reality. Polaris is not "fixed" to the North pole as claimed by Eric the Flattard King and parroted by you. It clearly traces out a circle just like all the other stars. Another flattard claim busted with trivial observation.
If you weren't so retarded, you'd know. They only appear to orbit because the Earth is rotating. Their relative positions appear fixed in the sky because they are so far away. I've explained this to you before you changed accounts.
Ad hoc gibberish for the gullible rubes by the Flattard King. Does it even make sense to them? No, they don't try to understand what he's saying. It's just a video they can point to.
Challenge: Find a video of the stars behaving as the four spheres do. Explain why there are four spheres.
The southern pole and stars are trivially explained by a spherical Earth. Sunsets are trivially explained by a spherical Earth. They make no sense in Flattard Land. There are no predictive flattard maps. None are used for navigation or to predict they sky above for any time and place on Earth. These are all exquisitely and trivially mapped using a spherical Earth.
Flattards do nothing but throw feces at the zookeepers.
[ + ] i_scream_trucks
[ - ] i_scream_trucks 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:57:01 ago (+2/-0)
incorrect.
Absolutely nothing makes sense to a retard.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:10:26 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:23:13 ago (+1/-5)
People are indoctrinated to believe that water magically curves due to a supernatural force called "gravity" in which the scale to perform any experiment on is to be considered "too big for the human mind to comprehend" and the scientists behind such dogmatic scientism are to be considered infallible.
Sound familiar?
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:51:33 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:53:59 ago (+0/-1)
Religion in a nutshell
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:55:24 ago (+3/-1)
They want those gold medals you won back
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 22:00:31 ago (+1/-1)
The only reason you believe in a globe is because you were programmed to.
Just like the holocaust.
Go around telling normies that the holocaust wasnt real and kikes should have been genocided will make you look retarded to them too.
Normie v2 is what Ill start calling you lot.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 22:01:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 22:02:52 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 22:03:52 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:40:41 ago (+3/-1)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:56:13 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:32:59 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:58:29 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:01:29 ago (+4/-2)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:29:45 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] texasblood
[ - ] texasblood 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 18, 2022 11:05:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:00:34 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:40:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:00:18 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:08:47 ago (+3/-0)
Your reliance on videos shows you do not understand the basic principles. You can not answer the question.
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:16:06 ago (+1/-4)
Flight paths make more sense on a flat earth model then a globe model, especially when you take into account earths mythical spin of 1000mph eastwards. Meaning that planes flying west would have to compete with this nonsensical rotation but they don't because earth isn't a tilted, wobbling, spinning ball.
From now on, nobody here is allowed to use videos. Everyone has to type out the answers in long winded paragraphs because we know how sane those posts appear to look.
But carry on, what other excuses have you got? The video answered your question sufficiently. Now how about you answer a simple ball question?
How many flat horizons does it take to shape a ball with the circumference of 25,000 miles?
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:28:14 ago (+3/-0)
You are the most retarded person I've met since Hans Wormhat. Wait, you aren't Hans are you?
Could you define this?
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:50:58 ago (+1/-2)
Horizons are flat. Not curved. Have to really hammer this point into the head of globetards that genuinely believe that spheres can have straight lines on them. No matter what the size of the sphere is, you wouldn't have a flat horizon at eye level. It would be displaying the slightest convexity as well as never reaching eye level. Especially if you elevated yourself up on the ball, say on a mountain. The horizon should be well below eye level and be curving away at 8 inches per mile squared.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:55:30 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:07:54 ago (+2/-0)
You really do not have the slightest idea wtf you're talking about. You state things as certainty that could only be dependent on circumstance.
You and flat earth are retarded and always will be.
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:15:38 ago (+0/-3)
This is the same response that leftists espouse when they are shown facts that question the narratives in their head.
Every single person ever born was a flat earther before being indoctrinated into the belief of living on a ball. This indoctrination takes place through various mediums, mainly mainstream media and school institutions. These same institutions are responsible for peddling the holohoax, climate hoax, gender hoax, black lives matter hoax e.t.c.
You faggots are no different to the modern leftist. You think you aren't an NPC like them but your just at a different level within the kike matrix. You broke free of one part but remain stuck in the next part.
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:24:16 ago (+2/-0)
The earth is not flat. You are a moron
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:12:13 ago (+2/-0)
How many flat horizons does it take to shape a ball with the circumference of 25,000 miles?
Are you listening to yourself?
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 21:26:48 ago (+0/-2)
Fact. Horizons are flat, level, straight, zero degree's of measurable curvature to it. No matter if you are a few feet of the ground of 121,000 ft of the ground. Flat, level, straight horizon.
25,000 miles in circumference is the accepted claim of the size of ball earth. This figure will never and can never change.
Now, in case you missed grade 1 basic geometry about shapes, edges and faces. You should be familiar with the fact that a sphere/ball has no edges, no faces and no vertices.
http://slittlefair.staff.shef.ac.uk/teaching/phy115/session1/geom/geom.html#:~:text=On%20the%20surface%20of%20a%20sphere%2C%20however%2C%20there%20are%20no,passing%20through%20the%20two%20points.
Balls are curved and have ZERO straight lines to them. The curvature of the ball earth is 8 inches per mile squared. This is formulated using basic spherical trigonometry and the claimed circumference of 25,000 miles.
So, how many flat, level, straight horizons does it take to shape a ball?
Zero because it is impossible.
Retard.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:14:41 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:17:48 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:21:35 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:46:08 ago (+0/-1)
They only work on a flat earth model. Globe believers fail to leave out the supposed rotation of earth at 1000mph. How would an airplane even land at a northward facing landing strip if the object it is trying to land on is rotating at 1000mph?
Absolutely nothing about the ball earth model makes any sense at all.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 01:44:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] gaybeeye
[ - ] gaybeeye -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:13:37 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] gaybeeye
[ - ] gaybeeye -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 20:12:31 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:04:03 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:41:01 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 12:31:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 13:14:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 13:20:15 ago (+0/-0)