Sign into an existing account

Christianity makes meat shields out of your blood kin. No one wants to kill a White christcuck, but they're constantly standing in the way.

A Heroic Age is when all the non-heroic characters have been defeated and only the heroes are left standing.

This is why the Christ-Cucks resent the idea of the Heroic Age. They know they won't be a part of it and so they create barriers preventing it from happening.

Need proof? Ask 100 pastors what they would do if they saw a White man curb stomping a baby Jew. He'll call the police, all 100 pastors would call the police.

The only question you need to ask yourself right now is. Are you interested in creating the Heroic Age? Or are you one of the people who prevent the Heroic Age?

Your impotent seven seas of bitch tears are more than enough thanks

Youre welcome

did not read

Europe has been on a downhill slide to self-destruction for at least a good hundred years, most directly or indirectly attributable to the jews and their support network (commies, socialists, miscellaneous leftists, libtards and xtian lapdogs). Once upon a time before that, the jesusfreakos did not wantonly give tongue rides to the jews. Many hated them like Martin Luther, and many more just didn't give a shit about them. That has changed, with a goodly majority now eager toadies, especially the evangelicals & fundamentalists.

"You can condemn pro-homo pro-immigrant christians without attacking all christians because christianity is not monolithic. Different christians believe different things."

I'm so glad we've reached the "not all christians" stage. As long as some of them aren't faggots, we shouldn't judge the majority. Right?

Preheat the ovens to maximum

deleted

Skip, skip, skip. Try a new response kikebot.

I could improve your attitude with a blow torch. Why is that retarded to believe?

What is there worth worshipping in evolution? Belief in does not equal veneration or reverence. There's a coffee mug on my table. My religion is not muggist.


Why?

What is the point?

Here's the thing. I don't think many atheists really understand their theory, and I say this without the slightest bit of condescension, because the intuitions that cause them not to understand their own theory just are those which the theist will understand as intellectual intuition of The Good.

What I mean is that atheists fail to comprehend all of the consequences of their theory. If atheism is true, then there is only futility. You speak about better and worse genes, and better and worse societies...for what? Who cares?

You say: to survive.

Why? Who cares?

You say: to make sure my children and their children survive.

Why? Who cares?

You'll be long gone. If you think that sounds simplistic and cynical, again, I don't think you're comprehending all of the consequences of your theory, or what death really entails if atheism is true. Nothing matters. You will die. So you have children. They're going to die. We could dominate the planet, live for billions of years, and eventually this universe is going to fail to support any life at all. Eventually, each of us, even your great, great grandchild will be dead long enough not to exist even in the memories of their progeny.

And what is your comfort? That they will be there, running the exact rat race that each of those before him did, just to continue the fact of existence...and for what? To expand as far into space as we can before all chemical reactions become impossible to proceed?

Now, it may very well be that you have a short-term interest in 'your people' having differential survival success, especially since we're dealing with the brutal ape species called homo sapiens. If you lose, you might be raped and murdered. Your children might be raped and murdered. Therefore it would be very well if everyone had their shit together so that you might personally live in the comfort of your apex echelon in society, at least within the auspices of relative dominance.

But let's make no mistake, that the only rational approach to the fact of life, which has no special station in this universe (it is just a particular local configuration of chemical reactions), if one is too afraid to kill himself or herself, is hedonism. That is, to pursue within the bounds of reason a tradeoff between the maximum and the most stable stream of pleasure/comfort that is possible given what you expect to be the term of your natural life.

And if we are to be honest about the nature of life and its pleasures/joys, since we've said elsewhere that objectivity is a value, then we must admit that life is more tragic than it is joyful. To be sure, our moments of emotional joy (do not be fooled to believe they are anything other than a certain neural state, nothing else) might convince us, because of the quality of what it is like to be in them, that they are the 'purpose of life'. But life has no purpose. Purpose is telos, and under evolution there is only reproduction. All of the rewards commensurate with pleasurable neural states are at least indirectly related to this essential function, and life consists of disproportionate suffering. By this I mean that it is filled with sheer mundane boredom and monotony at best; at worst, it is filled with far more abject suffering, together with the brute fact that one's physical peak is reached roughly a quarter of the way through (so that he/she might reproduce) and the rest of life consists thereafter of one's wick burning out - often meaning physical and mental degeneration, wasting away before the eyes of those we know. Calling these things our 'golden years' in some kind of sick joke to make light of the fact we're too old to reproduce or do anything socially relevant any longer, like fight wars, steal thrones, steal off in a fiery romance or slay a dragon.

And most people won't think for more than twenty seconds about the most brutal fact, that they're going to die, and that's the end of it. Really the end. No more experience. The world goes on and eventually forgets you, and you won't be there for it.

And that's not even to begin speaking about the myriad disappointments, failures, hopeful lies we tell ourselves to scar over our mediocrity. That's not even to touch on children born with congenital birth defects, or who get bone cancer and die before they've even gotten a chance to fuck, or the kid who for absolutely no fucking reason other than bad luck (pure fucking chance) gets thrown into a medical machine, on a slew of drugs that alters his or her life forever - literally changes them as a person. Hopefully my boy or girl will find someone nice to settle down with.

Or the fact you are just 30,000 days of rising, working, eating and sleeping, with some good neural states here and there.


What a flight of fancy the atheist must come back from when they personify the universe this way! What is the ontological basis for your connection between man and the universe, as though we are some mentalistic appendage of this universe, used by the latter as instrument for its self-understanding? This is nonsense under atheism, and I mean pure nonsense.

You have no more connection to the universe than you do to the moon, or to anything on earth even. It's all stuff. You're also just stuff. The universe isn't an object. It's a collection. It's just the collection of objects. There just happens to be stuff, and the universe is just the thought: 'taking all that stuff together'.

Again, I don't think many atheists go 'full atheist'. It's bleaker than the bleakest, and any attempt to salvage the non-bleak from it is mere coping. I cannot stress this enough.

And I find your whole premise in this most recent quote so ironic. It's ironic in its optimism, which can have no basis in your own theory. For whatever it would be that understands the universe, it can only be intellect. And what happens when man turns his intellect upon his lot objectively? Is it an expansive and unifying understanding of a holistic universe replete with meaning and purpose? No, it's a collection of things that's eventually going to expand to the point that all chemistry stops and all of the thermodynamic history that preceded it is futile, forever.

When man turns his intellect objectively upon the state of affairs under atheism, then antinatalism becomes rational. Suicide becomes rational. And if one reasons against suicide because either (a) he fears death or (b) he fears the pain of death or (c) he convinces himself that there is something worthwhile to do (for the sake of the future, of course!), then all of this is only interpreted (that is, its significance is determined) as the result of a more or less autonomous first-person filter, via which all good things are good contingently upon they impact the neurons, i.e. neural states. We think: love. We think: productive work. We think: legacy. None of this is good because it is objectively good, in itself, nor is it good because you 'said so' like some pathetic existentialist. No, the alternatives to suicide will be rationally worthwhile just because they cause certain neural states to be the case, which in turn cause your interpretations of those things to be positive. It's all arbitrary. Whether those things are actually good is an incoherent question under atheism. They make your neurons do things that cause your awareness to contain a positive value-tone of feeling, and that summarizes the entire dynamic of every motivation you'll ever have, so that this unfortunate assemblage of meat and bone and sinew can autonomously pursue replicating itself according to the same paradigm that amino acids do in muck, and viruses do in ant brains.

Weinstein once said, "Once you understand the game, why would you continue to play it?" How's that for the intellect turning on itself and understanding the universe?


Who cares? Are you afraid these parasites will make your life harder in the short-run? You'd like to live without that fear? In the long-run, it cannot matter. You'll be gone. Non-existent. It doesn't matter what happens on this planet. The planet will be gone. The universe will be gone. This is a dance of shit taking place by sheer accident of temperature, pressure, and the right substrate in water.

Who cars if parasites win? Because you need to secure a future for your people? For what? To do more surviving? To win what? What is this game? And what have our winners for winning?


Isn't that just evolution talking though? What is this duality where 'you' are taking charge? What's you? And what's it taking charge of? Isn't 'you' just evolution anyway, so isn't whatever you're talking about still just evolution? The irony that you believe in evolution but that you set whatever 'you' is categorically apart from it, such that you can control it and somehow be independent from it.

Well what part of you was independent from this god evolution? It's like not knowing whether one is dreaming. How can you know you are not just programmed by evolution to think this way about evolution and 'overcoming it'?

From where is this independence and humanism arising? If you want to be an atheist, be an atheist.

PWH just described her vagina using an analogy to luxury window decor. If anybody here had ever thought, "I want Helena to talk dirty to me", this is your moment.

FOR CRYING OUT LOUD, what do I have to do for you to let me stick my dick in your short valance!?

Post pics

LORD PAZUZU WILL GRANT YOU A CONE OF SNOW AND WILL TAKE FROM YOU EVERYTHING AND YOU WILL BE THANKFUL