second picture down: clear as day damage where a wing from a plane hit the Pentagon. why have I heard for years that there is no mark from the wings? I would like to not be associated with people being so wrong. we are right about the entire big picture. why be wrong about stupid shit - Upgoat

-3

second picture down: clear as day damage where a wing from a plane hit the Pentagon. why have I heard for years that there is no mark from the wings? I would like to not be associated with people being so wrong. we are right about the entire big picture. why be wrong about stupid shit
submitted by deleted to conspiracy 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 10:53:25 ago (+5/-8) (conspiracy)

deleted

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 5 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 10:56:43 ago (+6/-1)

There's no plane wreckage. Planes leave wrecked plane parts when they crash. I saw the damage personally a month after it happened. It wasn't a plane.

[ + ] cyclops1771

[ - ] cyclops1771 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 11:12:20 ago (+4/-0)

Planes leave wrecked plane parts when they crash

Wrecked planes, when they crash, are doing so at the slowest possible speed, with two experienced pilots doing everything in their power to reduce the impact of the crash. Not flying near top speed directly trying to INCREASE the impact.

I am not saying you are 100% wrong, I am just saying comparing this to "other crashes" is not an apples to apples comparison. Problem is, the only way to replicate the results is to retest, and most people do not have a 767 and a concrete office building to spare to make the test.

Additionally, what did they do with the crew? They are gone. Did the CIA kill them? My cousin flew AA for 35 years as stewardess and purser. She knew Charlie, and was at his wedding to a fellow FA. So, where did he go? He left his family behind, wherever he went if he wasn't disappeared. Where did the plane go he taxied away that day? Where did he land it, and why would he do it?

Never stop asking questions, even if they lead you to a place you don't want to go.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 11:06:46 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:44:32 ago (+1/-0)

You're a liar. There was plane wreckage found in the crash.

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:52:11 ago (+2/-0)

https://vimeo.com/604231275

Sure there was. Go to 15:10.

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:11:44 ago (+0/-0)

This is retarded. The video you link is comparing a private plane traveling at takeoff/landing speeds versus a commercial airliner flying at over 500 miles per hour.

Analysis of the scene is completely consistent with a plane, including wreckage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:18:03 ago (+1/-0)*

You obviously didn't watch it far enough. He shows a case where a 737 went full speed into a mountain. It didn't look like the Pentagon. That "wreckage" doesn't match the type of engine in a 757. Even Rolls Royce says so. He explains it. Also that tiny little engine piece by the guys foot at 5:05, you think that's from a 757? And the fuselage wreckage is small enough for one man to carry. Also, jet fuel exploding doesn't create shockwaves. You're kinda gullible aren't you. Do you also believe that a "pilot" that had trouble flying a Cessna was able to pilot a 757 at 500mph near the ground to hit a target? You're kinda gullible/stupid aren't you.

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:23:16 ago (+0/-0)

You obviously didn't watch it far enough. He shows a case where a 737 went full speed into a mountain.

Then give me the timestamp. I'm not going to watch the entire video.

That "wreckage" doesn't match the type of engine in a 757. Even Rolls Royce says so.

https://tobefree.press/2015/03/10/pentagon-boeing-757-engine-investigation-pentagon-debris-matches-the-characteristics-of-a-rotor-disk-from-the-rolls-royce-rb211-535-too-small-to-be-from-a-global-hawk-or-tomahawk/

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:40:16 ago (+0/-0)*

I gave you the timestamp. Also, if you don't watch a good portion of it you're missing most of the reasons I think you're wrong. You have to watch the whole part about the pentagon. It's prolly about 30 min of the entirety.

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:58:36 ago (+0/-0)

I watched all the way to the analysis of the engine. How long do you think I'm going to watch a shitty "Loose Change" video?

It's prolly about 30 min of the entirety.

Yeah, fuck off. I posted a video less than 10 minutes in length that shows all the evidence lines up with a 757, including the light poles. I gave you a link about the Rolls Royce engine. The "cruise missile" theory of the Pentagon is retarded.

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 14:10:41 ago (+0/-0)

Yeah except it doesn't and you're refusing to watch why. Stay stupid. I'm out.

[ + ] chrimony

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 14:21:53 ago (+0/-0)

Keep believing in stupid theories and shitty documentaries like "Loose Change". You have no comment on a video less than 10 minutes long, but you expect me to keep watching for 30 minutes after I already busted two of the claims.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 11:50:07 ago (+3/-1)

deleted

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:15:22 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:17:36 ago (+1/-1)

deleted

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:27:47 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:56:19 ago (+1/-1)

Bullshit.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 14:37:48 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 17:56:34 ago (+0/-0)*

If it were so cut and dry, why would they hide all the other frames? Because they made it just vague enough for retarded people like you to buy. There are videos from at least 5 other sources that they won't release. Can you explain why? The most surveilled place on earth and we get 2 frames from one camera. Fucking retard. Seriously. You are mentally retarded if you buy the official story. You should be legally mandated to wear a helmet at all times. Although, there really is nothing to be damaged anymore if you buy into that shit.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:10:50 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:50:31 ago (+1/-0)

Related: https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=627422e45b757

"How does a "cruise missile" take out multiple light poles dozens of feet apart?"

All the evidence at the scene indicates a plane, including the wreckage found and the one video we have of the event.

[ + ] lord_nougat

[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 13:30:49 ago (+0/-0)

Maybe those poles were 5g antennae and melted down of their own accord!

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 11:06:05 ago (+2/-1)

I see some damage next to the hole but nothing that looks like a wing mark. Other poster is also correct about there being way too lottle wreckage. Aluminum doesn't just disintegrate.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 11:07:37 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:51:21 ago (+0/-0)*

https://vimeo.com/604231275

Go to 15:10. No plane was at the pentagon. The only engine part they found was about the size of a cruise missile, not a 757 engine.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:07:44 ago (+1/-1)

deleted

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:09:37 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 18, 2022 12:07:15 ago (+0/-0)*

deleted

Sign into an existing account