Photos and videos of children. - Upgoat - "where a goat can be a goat"

Photos and videos of children.
submitted by Ozark to whatever 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 06:57:51 ago (+9/-9) (whatever)

Children can not consent or understand the implications of having their likeness posted in public. I don't think many people here would disagree with me on this.
Yesterday, @blumen4alles aka @small_slim_coochie
Made this post: https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost?postid=6323afdfe5027

The weirdo relishes in using children to troll the site. My proposal is simple, ban photos and videos of children where children are the sole subject matter. @system

For anyone that doesn't know,
small_slim_coochie = child_pussy.

40 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 1 point 2.5 yearsNov 12, 2022 09:37:24 ago (+1/-0)

I agree.

[ - ] bobdole9 10 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:42:48 ago (+11/-1)

A kid getting a kitten is really irritating people?

- video is from a news site
- girl's mom/ parent/ guardian records and posts the video

Last I checked I'm responsible for my children until they're 18 or they choose to emancipate themselves.

Bitching "pedo" over this is nonsense. Go ahead and block him and be done with it.

[ + ] SilentByAssociation

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:28:21 ago (+4/-0)

The thing that's concerning is the appearance of evil. It appears "evil" because the user in question has been accused of being a millstone enthusiast -- accusations he must be well aware of by now. So it's either that or else he wants to be edgy. He could very well be full spectrum, but I wouldn't suspect autism. And I doubt it's content he genuinely finds heartwarming. So I go back to the first two options: he wants to edgy and stir the pot, or he derives a sick pleasure from this.

In perusing v/documentaries last month, I came across the Kinsey Syndrome. Difficult to watch. Kinsey had "documented" that children who are being violated often cry, but according to him it's not because they're in pain or afraid of the abuser. A "tears of joy" reaction like this is what Kinsey and his cronies wanted to believe was happening, although such is absolutely not the case.

Considering the circumstances, posting that video is questionable.

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:47:21 ago (+3/-0)

If the video was posted in an anon sub, would it be judged on the content itself? As in, is all the bitching really because of the user who posted it?

I've had instances where I have been so happy I've been weepy (holding your freshly birthed child), and amazingly I've never been abused.

[ + ] Sector7

[ - ] Sector7 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:56:57 ago (+1/-0)

Why is so much of the nu-voat user base so retarded? Who watches that video of the child and thinks about sex?

"Well, I think about sex when I see a young girl child because I think someone else is thinking about sex when they see her."

Meanwhile, it's just a video of a young girl crying tears of happiness over getting a pet kitten. I've enjoyed sites full of weirdos since the internet began, but the obsession with pedophilia on voat is not one I share. Kick pedo posters when they post, and kick serial pedo accusers on the second false claim.

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:51:58 ago (+3/-6)

- video is from a news site

Well that just makes everything jim-dandy and on the fucking up-and-up.

"Bitching "pedo" over this is nonsense"

Learn to read, faggot. Children can not consent or understand the implications of having their likeness posted in public.

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 9 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:07:56 ago (+9/-0)

Children can not consent or understand the implications of having their likeness posted in public

That responsibility falls on the parent. The parent is the legal guardian. What the parent chooses to do is up to them.

Should parents plaster the internet with their kids? Fuck no...but many do.

Video is from a news site

Why yes, if a video clip that is seen by millions of people is fine for the public and has not been taken down, then it should be fine.

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:18:30 ago (+0/-0)

"That responsibility falls on the parent. The parent is the legal guardian. What the parent chooses to do is up to them."

Do you think that child's single mother has the werewithall to imagine that her child's image would be posted to an obscure message board by somebody that uses the handle, small_slim_coochie?

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:31:40 ago (+4/-0)

The parent made the decision to put a video on the internet for a dopamine hit. Putting things of your children is the parent's choice...one I would not do.

They may be naive thinking "this video will stay with my social media friends" but that goes out the window when a news site gets permission to distribute the video from the parent.

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:45:25 ago (+1/-3)

That wierdo is going to bring an interactive drag-queen grooming operation here and you faggots will say "The parents are cool with it. It's freedom of speech".

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:52:26 ago (+3/-0)

Good to know men in demon makeup reading to kids is the same as a White girl happy to have a baby animal to take care of and love.

[ + ] SilentByAssociation

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:29:28 ago (+0/-0)

Certainly not. It was heartwarming for her, but little does she know...

[ + ] CHIRO

[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 09:49:53 ago (+4/-0)*

Were you morally offended by America's Funniest Home Videos? Those children couldn't consent either, but that program ran without issue for how many years? Many of the videos had only children as the subject matter.

I see your reaction as analogous to the incel reaction to women. You see something bad is going on with a particular thing - women or children - and your response is to just go nuclear. No women. No children. If someone can possibly hurt, corrupt or defile that thing, then we must build a universal bubble around them.

But this kind of response is exactly what the world powers want. They want one side that goes full evil, and one side that goes so-morally-righteous-it-becomes-evil.

The video of the little girl receiving the kitten was wholesome. Most of the people who saw that walked away from it feeling better and uplifted.

This reactionaryism has to stop.

Were parents wrong for making home videos of their kids and sharing them with anybody? I mean, since the kids couldn't consent?

Say that Blume does post some questionable content. Not all of his content is questionable. This particular video was not. But does this mean that if one guy posts some questionable content, that anything from the good categories he posted should also be banned as content and subject matter?

This sounds remarkably like people who would ban guns 'if it would save just one life'.

How vulnerable you are to your enemies! All they have to do is mix the offensive things with your most cherished things, and you'll eradicate both! They won't even require violence. They can just count on your moral reactions to obscure your own value set, and you'll think you've chosen this.

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 10:55:11 ago (+3/-0)

Believe the phrase you're describing is "pearl clutching".

[ - ] cyclops1771 5 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 09:36:37 ago (+5/-0)

If the first thing you think of when you see that video is "sex", you are the problem.

Children and their innocence is the heart and soul of every person, family, and nation. Hence why Satan and his followers the jews want to corrupt children, because they are the embodiment of everything good.

Every time you think "sex" when you see a child, you have let Satan take over just a little bit more of your soul. Congratulations.

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 10:52:44 ago (+0/-2)

I didn't bring up sex, you did though.

[ + ] cyclops1771

[ - ] cyclops1771 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 10:57:08 ago (+3/-0)

Didn't say you brought it up. I said IF you THINK 'sex' when you see a child, you have been brainwashed by the Satanic jew media.

Do you even Engrish?

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] -3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 11:54:34 ago (+0/-3)

You responded to the OP, that's me. Fuck off with your gaslighting.

[ + ] cyclops1771

[ - ] cyclops1771 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:14:46 ago (+1/-0)

Nice attempt to obfuscate away from the point. It's OK to admit you may have misread my comment. It doesn't make you a bad person, it just means you made a minor mistake. When you find yourself in a hole, the first step is to stop digging.

So, back to the point. IF a person (not "you" any person generally) sees a video on a young child showing delight, and that person (not specifically "you", any generic person) thinks of "sex" (as in, "she looks cute, I want to see her naked" or "I bet some sick pedo is thinking of seeing her naked" or "she's wearing too short of shorts, and it makes me think about sex or of someone else thinking about sex") than you (not you specifically, but any generic person) has been corrupted by current society and Satanic jew media into sexualizing children in order to remove their innocence. This makes them a sacrifice and offering to their sick god, through corrupting the good for base reasons. You (not you specifically, any generic person) have been conditioned to think base thoughts that cling to those animal instincts rather than higher and more spiritually fulfilling thoughts of joy, happiness and goodness. Every "bad" thought reduces the number of "good" thoughts, and THIS MATTERS. The "good" thought has been sacrificed, and the "bad" thought is given to Satan as an offering, and he offers only the deadly sins of corporal and worldly pleasures in return.

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:24:30 ago (+0/-1)

Too long, didn't read your bullshit.

[ + ] cyclops1771

[ - ] cyclops1771 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 15:19:00 ago (+0/-0)

Ok, Pedo. Go fuck more kids.

[ - ] didyouknow 5 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:13:11 ago (+5/-0)

blumen needs to be dumped into a volcano

[ - ] Conspirologist 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:02:35 ago (+3/-0)

I concur. There are trolls here deliberately trying to discredit this site.

[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:37:36 ago (+3/-1)

No we don't need more rules, Just people who know how to use the block button

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 12:22:18 ago (+1/-1)

That's a losing strategy. That's how you get legally married faggots adopting children.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:01:08 ago (+2/-0)

Agree.

[ - ] Wahaha 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:44:19 ago (+2/-0)

Or how about we don't ban random things since we cherish free speech? You're free to fuck off back to reddit, though.

[ + ] i_scream_trucks

[ - ] i_scream_trucks 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:47:29 ago (+5/-2)

no one said shit about 'free speech'

this is an ongoing bullshit gaslight. its the same guy. next step is cartoon kids. then loli porn. then CP. then ban. then creates a new alt and bitches about 'muhfreezepeach' until that alt doesnt get responded to, then starts posting children, then people defend him and tell us to block him, then he starts posting cartoon kids.....

this has been the cycle for at least the last 4 years.

now youre all caught up you understand why this aint a free speech website.

not sure whether the game is just gaslighting the fuck out of the rank and file here or to actually try and get us all done for child porn but either way, fuck that noise. if youre posting pics/vids of a child that isnt your own youre still a creepy motherfucking pedo.

[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:00:44 ago (+4/-2)

Free Speech is bullshit anyways. Drag fags reading books to kids is technically free speech, but it's not fucking ok. Marxist professor's brainwashing the youth is free speech, shouldn't be tolerated. I think it's time to start burning some hooks, er I mean books.

[ + ] Wahaha

[ - ] Wahaha 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 17, 2022 12:11:45 ago (+0/-0)

There's a time and a place for things. I like this place because everyone can post whatever without getting banned. If that changes I might as well go to reddit and have the same compromises with more people.

[ + ] Ozark

[ - ] Ozark [op] -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:05:25 ago (+0/-2)

Do you really need to post videos of other people's children to express yourself? Does restricting your ability to post the likeness of someone else's child supress your rights?

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 5 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:12:23 ago (+5/-0)

You are forbidden from finding joy in videos containing human beings, regardless of age.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 07:45:48 ago (+1/-0)

I always found SSC to be a vulgar username; whether referring to children or Asians, it's still gross.

[ + ] bobdole9

[ - ] bobdole9 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:10:27 ago (+3/-0)

Must not have been around for all the big_fat_dangus alts focused around blumen4alles.

Small_slim_coochie is the opposite of big_fat_dangus. Gross? I guess. Trolling account? Looks like it to me.

[ + ] FacelessOne

[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:05:24 ago (+2/-0)

Ahem.

Asian Pussy is referred to as Sideways Vagina

[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:08:48 ago (+3/-0)

It's all slanty and smells like egg fried rice.

[ + ] SilentByAssociation

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 08:30:30 ago (+1/-0)

Ew, thanks for the new slur.

[ - ] RMGoetbbels -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 19:11:14 ago (+0/-1)

Look bro, we've all had a fucking enough of this pedo shit. There isn't a pedo around every fucking corner waiting to snatch up a kid. Can it.

[ - ] observation1 -2 points 2.6 yearsSep 16, 2022 10:36:13 ago (+0/-2)