☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
45

Today's global temperatures are not unprecedented.

submitted by UncleDoug to ClimateChangeSkeptic 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 08:52:42 ago (+46/-1)     (files.catbox.moe)

https://files.catbox.moe/kh4kvl.mp4

Censored science to maintain the redistribution of wealth.


30 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] oyblat 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 19, 2022 15:13:10 ago (+0/-0)

When they talk about the money going into this narrative, who profits? How does that work?

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.6 yearsOct 19, 2022 19:58:29 ago (+0/-0)

Well supermarkets for one are double dipping by charging you for bags that are already covered in the cost price of goods.

Companies like patagonia its probably a little more complicated, like social media presence and levies on manufacturing.

[ - ] chrimony 7 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 09:12:35 ago (+7/-0)

And even if the hockey stick graph were true, sliding into another ice age is terrible. Cold kills far more than heat. More CO2 is good for plants. Less is worse. Vast amounts of arable land would be under ice.

[ - ] solomonpapermaster 8 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 09:37:32 ago (+8/-0)*

This is something that most NPCs fail to grasp. CO2 is poisonous for us, but for plant life it's their oxygen. The planet needs both. If you increase CO2 then you will see record growth.

They said the great barrier rief was dying, in reality it just moved a little and has been growing like crazy.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 09:52:21 ago (+0/-0)

High co2 levels acidify the oceans, this kills the phytoplankton that provide much of Earth's oxygen.
That kills everything.

[ - ] dontknowwhatiwant 4 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 10:35:38 ago (+4/-0)

Then why was all life on the planet incredibly diverse & huge during the millions of years of the dinosaurs when Co2 was many increments higher than now?

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 2 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 09:48:45 ago (+2/-0)

It's about oxygen. The temp matters some here, but the acidification of the oceans will kill the phytoplankton that make much of Earth's oxygen. High co2 levels cause this acidification at any temp. Then everything dies.

[ - ] chrimony 2 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 10:50:58 ago (+3/-1)

It's nonsense. CO2 levels were much higher in the past, and oxygen producing life in the oceans did not die.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 10:59:45 ago (+1/-0)

Logic fail. Co2 levels being higher in the past does not address the CO2 levels being EVEN HIGHER than historical records in the future.

You ever had an aquarium?

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 11:17:16 ago (+2/-1)

Your assumption that CO2 levels will be higher than in the past is wrong:

https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth103/sites/www.e-education.psu.edu.earth103/files/module05/image011.png

CO2 used to be MUCH higher in the past.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal -1 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 13:04:54 ago (+0/-1)

You've never even had an aquarium, kid?
Your illegible poorly marked graph is illegible and poorly marked.

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 14:21:25 ago (+0/-0)

I have. Fresh and salt. This may come as a shock. The ocean is not an aquarium.

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 16:11:47 ago (+0/-0)

You've never even had an aquarium, kid?

What kind of retard compares the climate and biosphere of the Earth with an aquarium? Yes, I've had an aquarium. It had an air pump and a carbon filter. It never rained. There were no glaciers in it either. What a maroon.

I'm talking about past CO2 levels, and you're talking about aquariums.

Your illegible poorly marked graph is illegible and poorly marked.

Only for retards like you. The axis are clearly labeled "Atmosphere CO2 concentration (ppm)" and "Time in Ma". Since you're a retard, I'll spell it out for you: It's showing the level of CO2 over the past 45 million years. The blown up inset shows the past 5 million years.

We are currently around 400 ppm. The graph shows that's not unusual in the past 5 millions years, at all. And it's been as high as 2000, and well over 1000 between 45 and 30 millions years ago.

Even the most extreme predicted scenario has CO2 about 1,000 ppm around 2100.

Do you need more spoon feeding, or is that enough?

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 18:37:59 ago (+0/-0)

Understanding an aquarium is a prerequisite to hoping to understand the earth's climate systems. So, expert, how did that carbon filter convert the nitrate to nitrogen?

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 18:41:58 ago (+0/-0)

Understanding an aquarium is a prerequisite to hoping to understand the earth's climate systems.

No, retard. The aquarium is not comparable to the Earth's biosphere and climate. It's a tank of water in a climate controlled house with a few fish in it.

I'm talking about past climate history. Your claims were demonstrably wrong, now go eat shit.

[ - ] Thought_Criminal 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 19:14:28 ago (+0/-0)

Why so mad, bro? You've demonstrated nothing to prove anything.
Continue thread

[ - ] boogienight 2 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 13:08:37 ago (+2/-0)*

Also unmentioned in the short, the ozone layer is back, the coral reef is thriving better and shows more growth and mass than it has in 40 years, the gigantic shelf glacier that they said would be entirely melted 12 years ago is now 3 times larger than it has been in decades and last year marked the greatest gain of ice in the glaciers than we've seen in a long time. The people concerned about their old climate concerns should be cheering and celebrating, but they hide the positives, they conceal goals that have been met and far exceeded by natural causes. If you're a company and you set goals for the employees, then you meet those goals and hide the results, this is the behavior of a traitorous, fraudulent company. And thats the whole ball of wax with the climate change custodians and narrative creators, they're fraudulent liars. Every step of the way they lie and then lie about the results. It's nothing more than a fake religion with psychopathic rabbis who are consciously running a grift for more handouts so they can buy more objects made from solid gold behind the scenes.

[ - ] RedBarchetta 2 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 10:13:49 ago (+2/-0)

NO SHIT. You know how I know? I Remember LAST FUCKING YEAR. And the Year before that and the past 50 fucking years.

[ - ] Boardallday3 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 16:29:25 ago (+1/-0)

It's actually not even close to how warm it has been just in the last 100m years. Life was thriving when it was 15° warmer. The worst models (which use baseless water vapor and methane feedback loops) predict 2-3° by 2100

[ - ] Sh1tt1ngMys3lf 1 point 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 13:01:18 ago (+1/-0)

Randall Carlson knows his shit.

[ - ] 1234lkjh 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 14, 2022 02:23:03 ago (+0/-0)

"Totally normal, bro."
-Lake Mead

[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 14, 2022 06:17:26 ago (+0/-0)

Lake mead is a man-made reservoir as a result of the Hoover Dam and is an ecological disaster that has nothing to do with the study of climate.

[ - ] Wahaha -3 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 09:57:24 ago (+1/-4)

Yeah, and the moonlanding was faked. What does the truth matter if the media is very good at repeating lies?

[ - ] Boardallday3 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 16:31:23 ago (+0/-0)

Proof? Why do you think the moon landing was faked?

[ - ] Wahaha 0 points 1.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 17:03:30 ago (+1/-1)

It's fairly obvious by just looking at the faked footage. Also, NASA to this day claiming it's impossible for humans to go to the moon because of the deadly radiation and simultaneously pretending that the tech was lost and it has somehow be impossible to rediscover the tech in the past decades. It's all such obvious bullshit you wonder why anyone would be retarded enough to believe the official story.