×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
27
10 comments block


[ - ] PostWallHelena 5 points 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 23:41:00 ago (+5/-0)

Whether or not she’s a piece of shit is not the issue. We must demand privacy from the surveillance state, ENOUGH!

This is a total violation and LE are snakes.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 08:28:45 ago (+2/-0)

People should have full control of their data. even your doctor should have to have you unencrypt the data they think they need to look at every time.

The only exception to this is if someone is convicted of a violent crime they could be put in a db. If it is ever overturned then they would need to be removed.

The state should have no biometric data of it's constituents, and the use of anything (like drivers license photos or prints) should never be allowed access other than for those stated goals (in that case to verify your identity).

[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 09:05:15 ago (+1/-0)

The only exception to this is if someone is convicted of a violent crime they could be put in a db

Like say, spanking your child?

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 10:55:33 ago (+0/-0)

You devil!!! (are people actually charged for spanking?)

No; like rape, robbery, assault, murder.

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 14:46:20 ago (+0/-0)

But jews and liberals have made it clear they will stretch the definition of any crime to fit their poloitcal purpose. They can not be allowed to have anyones dna.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 16:44:03 ago (+0/-0)

Political persecution doesn't need biometrics to happen, the problem is that currently you take a paternity test and next thing you know your cousin is arrested for a crime.

[ - ] binrobinrro 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 16:50:34 ago (+1/-0)

Woman bitches 'cause she got caught.

Now THAT'S an unusual story.

[ - ] RedBarchetta 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 13, 2022 10:33:13 ago (+1/-0)

Its ok to use DNA collected from genealogy but not from past crimes? Make fucking sense of that?

[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 2.7 yearsSep 12, 2022 23:06:41 ago (+2/-1)

This should be promoted as a "deterrent of future crime(s)".

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsSep 13, 2022 06:46:43 ago (+0/-1)

Bitches get stitches.