According to you, the sun dissapeared over the edge of a globe due to earths supposed rotation of 1000mph.
In reality the sun is the moving mass and it dissapears over the horizon due to our limited perspective on a flat plane. Light does not reach an infinite distance nor can we view objects that are millions if miles away. Physically impossible.
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 21:17:44 ago (+1/-0)
According to you, the sun dissapeared over the edge of a globe due to earths supposed rotation of 1000mph.
Of course. That's why the sun disappeared from bottom to top, and why the drone was able to bring it back into view by climbing, and why the cloud was still lit after it descended. Basic geometry.
In reality the sun is the moving mass and it dissapears over the horizon due to our limited perspective on a flat plane. Physically impossible.
Wut? How does a sun drop below a horizon in Flattard Land?
Light does not reach an infinite distance nor can we view objects that are millions if miles away.
If it's just too far away to see, why does climbing a drone bring it back into view? Also, the disk of the sun stayed the same size the whole time. If it was receding, it would have been shrinking. You guys are in denial of your own eyes.
So when it says the curvature is 8inch/mile^2, the inch/mile^2 are units, not a formula.
If the drop was proportionate to the square of the distance then the earth would be a parabola.
Notice in the very diagram that he's flashing every where but not actually reading that it says the drop is R(1-cos(sin-1(L/R))). That's going to come out to x=sqrt(R^2-L^2)-R when we simplify the trig, which is not equal to x=pL^2 where p is some constant factor.
But even the source math is kind of stupid. "Dropping" a certain amount is not equal to not being visible and doesn't consider that the clone would be standing up in a different orientation. So this video is badly interpreting someone else's already bad math.
So when it says the curvature is 8inch/mile^2, the inch/mile^2 are units, not a formula.
When it says the curvature is 8inches/mile^2 it is talking about the starting position on a ball, looking out towards any horizon. The supposed drop due to the curvature is formulated to be 8 inches per mile squared. Units are the form of measurement used in said formula.
Notice in the very diagram that he's flashing every where but not actually reading that it says the drop is R(1-cos(sin-1(L/R))).
The drop is 8 inches per mile squared, not "R(1-cos(sin-1(L/R)))" or whatever other kike terms you have learnt under the false theory of gravity and other theoretical sciences.
That's going to come out to x=sqrt(R^2-L^2)-R when we simplify the trig
Again you have replaced the "simple trig" of 8 inches per mile squared with some theoretical garbage that requires dedication into kike theoretical sciences to equate. This isn't about masturbating your intelligence by regurgitating advanced theoretical theorems you learnt at one point in time. This is plane simple math, in which you have to utilize kike pilpul and kike theoretic to dance around.
If we lived on a ball, no matter the size, we would have to look down to see the horizon. It would never be at our eye level.
It is terrible math, the fact that they teach this shit in school to show the curvature of the earth is stupid. This is the approximation globe earthers trust.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 11:29:22 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 11:06:15 ago (+1/-0)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gB1punBbeV8
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 18:01:15 ago (+0/-1)
In reality the sun is the moving mass and it dissapears over the horizon due to our limited perspective on a flat plane. Light does not reach an infinite distance nor can we view objects that are millions if miles away. Physically impossible.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 21:17:44 ago (+1/-0)
Of course. That's why the sun disappeared from bottom to top, and why the drone was able to bring it back into view by climbing, and why the cloud was still lit after it descended. Basic geometry.
Wut? How does a sun drop below a horizon in Flattard Land?
If it's just too far away to see, why does climbing a drone bring it back into view? Also, the disk of the sun stayed the same size the whole time. If it was receding, it would have been shrinking. You guys are in denial of your own eyes.
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 2 points 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 00:55:41 ago (+3/-1)*
So when it says the curvature is 8inch/mile^2, the inch/mile^2 are units, not a formula.
If the drop was proportionate to the square of the distance then the earth would be a parabola.
Notice in the very diagram that he's flashing every where but not actually reading that it says the drop is R(1-cos(sin-1(L/R))). That's going to come out to x=sqrt(R^2-L^2)-R when we simplify the trig, which is not equal to x=pL^2 where p is some constant factor.
But even the source math is kind of stupid. "Dropping" a certain amount is not equal to not being visible and doesn't consider that the clone would be standing up in a different orientation. So this video is badly interpreting someone else's already bad math.
[ + ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded
[ - ] DiggernicksIsAlsoRetarded [op] -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 01:10:31 ago (+1/-2)
When it says the curvature is 8inches/mile^2 it is talking about the starting position on a ball, looking out towards any horizon. The supposed drop due to the curvature is formulated to be 8 inches per mile squared. Units are the form of measurement used in said formula.
The drop is 8 inches per mile squared, not "R(1-cos(sin-1(L/R)))" or whatever other kike terms you have learnt under the false theory of gravity and other theoretical sciences.
Again you have replaced the "simple trig" of 8 inches per mile squared with some theoretical garbage that requires dedication into kike theoretical sciences to equate. This isn't about masturbating your intelligence by regurgitating advanced theoretical theorems you learnt at one point in time. This is plane simple math, in which you have to utilize kike pilpul and kike theoretic to dance around.
If we lived on a ball, no matter the size, we would have to look down to see the horizon. It would never be at our eye level.
[ + ] usedoilanalysis
[ - ] usedoilanalysis -1 points 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 11:35:29 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 00:30:51 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] xmasskull
[ - ] xmasskull 1 point 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 00:32:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 4 points 2.6 yearsSep 11, 2022 00:21:23 ago (+4/-0)