×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
7

What's the difference between Torah and Talmud?

submitted by Conspirologist to AskGoats 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 06:54:39 ago (+7/-0)     (AskGoats)

What's the difference between Torah and Talmud?

Why Jews need two books?


78 comments block


[ - ] FreeinTX 11 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 07:00:39 ago (+13/-2)

Seriously?

The Torah is basically the 1st 4 books of the OT that set down God's law.

The Talmud is an instruction book on how to circumvent God's law without, technically, breaking the law.

Those that live their lives through the Talmud are the modern day jews that are described in revelations as the Synagogue of Satan and the jews that Christianity rejects. These are the jews that hate Christians and who seek to destroy Christianity, Christian nations, and the white man.

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 3 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 07:05:52 ago (+3/-0)

Thanks.

[ - ] CHIRO 4 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:44:25 ago (+4/-0)*

The Torah is the first five books. The Tanakh refers to the entire twenty-four books, from Genesis through Chronicles.

Your question is complicated, if you desire a deep dive. This will be a summary.

The Tanakh has three parts: the books of Moses (Torah), the Prophets, and the Writings. You can think of these as foundational revelation, minor revelation and instructions (respectively). Practically, the prophets are revealing how a human person can go wrong in his relation to God, and the writings are the instructions for how to correct himself.

This might already seem a little confusing, since most people think of the Tanakh as a roughly historical document, a Jewish history.

The Torah is understood to literally represent the word of God, but this is the same word which created the world and everything in it. This means that the Torah is more than a mere history of a people, but is a narrative structure that actually represents an archetype of creation. The Torah, in its stories, contains the patterns by which God creates the universe. But that's just one part. It contains the patterns for how God creates God's image (man) and how He relates to this image (there is much to do here with God's names - it's too much to get into here).

So that's Torah. Then Prophets come and tell everyone how we went wrong. Then the Writings are the first line of commentaries on what to do about it (things like Psalms).

The Torah gives 10 commandments explicitly, but the Jews believe that on proper analysis, there are actually 613 commandments, including both 'positive' (do this) and 'negative' (don't do this) rules. The act of satisfying these commandments is called Mitzvah. Jews believe that Moses spent 40 days and nights on Sinai - he not only received the 10 commandments we are familiar with, but also received instruction on how to perform these. That's what took 40 days and nights. So Moses also came with an 'Oral Law'.

However, the 613 were carried on, not in writing, but through oral teaching (like the way they were received). In the time preceding the 2nd-3rd century AD, the oral law was preserved by the sages called Tannaim, who disagreed about the particulars.

Rabbi Yehudah Hasari, seeking to unify the Oral Law and stop this disagreement, compiled the Mishnah, a precise statement of the 613 commandments.

The Talmud consists of the (1) Mishnah, followed by (2) Gemara, which is further commentary on the Mishnah.

One can think of Gemara as practical talk about the Mishnah. It consists of later rabbis attempting to do two things primarily: (a) hash out specific theology for connecting Mishnah to Torah (exegesis, textual analysis) and (b) write down what is basically 'case law', how certain cases and new disputes were resolved.

The Jews would say they don't 'need' two books: Torah is the complete word of God. However, Moses didn't just get what was written. He got more, and the 'more' is how to interpret and enact what is in the written Torah. This had been carried on orally until someone thought it would be easier to preserve if written, hence the 'second' book (Talmud), which is really not a book so much as a compilation of the commentaries of the most respected rabbis of the day.

The typical Christian has no idea about the Oral Law or the Talmud.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 15:57:40 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] CHIRO 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 23:32:46 ago (+1/-0)

Thank you. I've been looking into Jewish-related things for years. The information in this post could probably be put together from a couple of Wikipedia searches. Some of it comes from listening to different rabbis talk about these books.

[ - ] chrimony 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:56:17 ago (+3/-1)

The Torah is basically the 1st 4 books of the OT that set down God's law.

Yahweh, the god of Israel's law. A book for Heebs by Heebs.

The Talmud is an instruction book on how to circumvent God's law without, technically, breaking the law.

And the New Testament is the book the Pharisee Saul ("Paul") brought to the gentiles to erase their own gods and replace them with the Heeb god Yahweh.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:36:05 ago (+3/-2)

Only part of the NT was written by Paul and written in Greek, not Hebrew. And Paul brought the NT to the jews and told them to reject judaism and accept the son of God. The jews rejected Paul and rejected Christ, which led to the "new covenant" and the path of the gentile to salvation.

You niggers are fucking retarded.

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:21:49 ago (+1/-0)

Only part of the NT was written by Paul and written in Greek, not Hebrew.

So what? That doesn't change the fact that Saul ("Paul") was a self-admitted Pharisee, nor does it change the fact that the Torah was a book for Heebs by Heebs. Just like the Talmud is an offshoot of the Torah, so is the New Testament.

And Paul brought the NT to the jews and told them to reject judaism and accept the son of God.

Translation: Saul first brought his message to the jews because he was a jew. The jews rejected the sacrificial messiah Jesus because they were waiting for a conquering messiah. So Saul brought the chump messiah to the gentiles instead, who then abandoned their gods in favor of the jewish god Yahweh. And now we have Christian Zionists as a result.

You niggers are fucking retarded.

You Christcucks are stoned on copium.

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:47:48 ago (+0/-1)

The Talmud is not an offshoot of the Torah.

Where does Paul call himself a Pharisee?

The Torah is God's law for all man kind, specifically Judeans who are not all jews.

Christian zionists are fallen Christians as discussed in the Bible.

You're so full of shit.

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:56:47 ago (+1/-0)

The Talmud is not an offshoot of the Torah.

Yes, it is. It references the Torah. It wouldn't make any sense without the Torah. Same thing for the New Testament.

Where does Paul call himself a Pharisee?

Saul does so in Philippians 3:5: "circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee"

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+3&version=ESV

The Torah is God's law for all man kind, specifically Judeans who are not all jews.

It's a book for Heebz by Heebz, Christcuck. The goyim are not the chosen ones with a promised land. Gentiles had their own gods before being cucked by the god of Israel, Yahweh.

Christian zionists are fallen Christians as discussed in the Bible.

Bullshit. They are Bible literalists trying to bring about the end times.

You're so full of shit.

You're a Christcuck living on copium.

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 13:21:50 ago (+0/-1)

The Satanic Bible references the Bible, that doesn't make it an offshoot. Ffs, retard. The Talmud is how to circumvent God's law without breaking God's law, which the OT demands death as penalty for doing so. Of course it references God's law.

Now, try reading Philippians 3 and maybe try to understand the context of what Paul was trying to teach.

You talk about Paul but don't even understand the lessons behind Paul, his name change, or the result of the jews rejecting Christ, having him killed, and rejecting Christianity. Why would we presume you've read the Bible, when these Sunday school lessons seem to go right over your head?

Goyem are the fallen Christians that serve jews. Of course they aren't chosen. Why would they be? They are hell bound with every other fake jew on earth, as discussed in the Bible. Today's goyem are the modern day Christian zionists helping these Sabatean Frankists bring about the coming of the satanic messiah that the bible refers to as the anti-Christ.

You seem to be the one engaged in a horrendously lazy cope.

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 13:57:19 ago (+1/-0)*

The Satanic Bible references the Bible, that doesn't make it an offshoot.

Yeah, it does. You don't have to like it, agree with it, or believe it represents reality in any way, but it is still and offshoot. You can freebase copium all you like, it doesn't change the fact that you worship some variation of Yahweh. There is no New Testament without the Old.

Now, try reading Philippians 3 and maybe try to understand the context of what Paul was trying to teach.

And here it comes, as usual and as expected: Denying the plain text and trying to twist it into something you can cope with. You're just like the guys who wrote and follow the Talmud.

Saul is relaying a bit of his background in his teaching. He was a Pharisee and a Heeb, and nothing you blab about changes that.

Why would we presume you've read the Bible, when these Sunday school lessons seem to go right over your head?

Because when you doubt and ask questions about the Bible you know so little about, I provide references. That's why you had to ask where Saul said he was a Pharisee while I already knew he was.

You seem to be the one engaged in a horrendously lazy cope.

I don't follow the Heeb god Yahweh -- you do, Christcuck. I don't have to make excuses for why I follow the Heeb Pharisee Saul -- you do, Christcuck. I don't praise our ancestors for abandoning their gods and becoming cucked by the god of Israel, a land they once conquered -- you do, Christcuck.

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 15:23:36 ago (+0/-1)

Referencing something doesn't make it an offshoot of that thing. That's fucking stupid.

Labeling everything as a cope isn't an argument and is dumb as fuck. You're like a boomer with a new word.

Context is important and your failure to grasp that simple fucking concept makes you a disingenuous nigger and a fucking faggot.

Saul was jewish but rejected judaism and was ousted from the tribe for it.

References taken out of context are meaningless and do nothing to prove your point. And when you use out of context references to make a point that's clearly in opposition to the written word, you show you've never actually read the written word and are using Google and being intellectually lazy and disingenuous.

You worship gods that are dead and long forgotten. And probably do so in a way That's guided by jewish satanic quabballah rituals.

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 16:29:08 ago (+1/-0)

Referencing something doesn't make it an offshoot of that thing. That's fucking stupid.

It's like saying Star Wars 2 isn't an offshoot of the original. You're fucking retarded. OLD Testament. NEW Testament. The Talmud makes no sense without the Torah it is commenting on. It's all derivative. Christcuck copium induces brain rot.

Labeling everything as a cope isn't an argument

It's not the argument. It's an accurate label that describes your "thinking" to go along with the argument, Christcuck.

Context is important

Indeed. The context of the New Testament is the Old Testament, the Heebz, the god of Israel, and the Pharisee Saul that brought Yahweh to the gentiles. The replacement of the old gods with a Heeb god is the context, Christcuck.

But you think "context" can replace literal meaning and plain facts when it doesn't. That's your Christcuck copium shining through.

Saul was jewish but rejected judaism and was ousted from the tribe for it.

Yes, a jew and a Pharisee to boot. As I've already said, he wasn't able to convince his fellow jews that Stickman Jebus was the new messiah, so he brought it to the gentiles, who became supremely cucked with a shitty variation of the original Heeb religion.

You worship gods that are dead and long forgotten.

I don't believe in any mythology. But I'm not going to celebrate that my ancestors gods were replaced with the Heeb god Yahweh like you do, Christcuck.

And probably do so in a way That's guided by jewish satanic quabballah rituals.

Hilarious. Many pagan rituals were incorporated into the Christcuck religion. So not only do you follow the jew god Yahweh, you also follow pagan rituals too. What a fucking mess you are.

[ - ] ZeudesJesucifer -7 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 07:24:36 ago (+0/-7)

So does this mean people this millennium are going to focus on satanists and not fall into the jew-hate antisemite trap? Probably not, people are stupid and didnt listen to Jesus when he told them they aren't Jews 2 thousand years ago. I think we've had enough time to figure out the nuance...

[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:20:12 ago (+2/-0)

Jew-hate antisemitism is a focus on satanism.

[ - ] ZeudesJesucifer -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:12:50 ago (+0/-1)

All jews are Satanists?

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:15:45 ago (+2/-1)

The one's that reject Christ and follow the Talmud? Yes.

[ - ] Razzoriel 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:24:33 ago (+0/-0)

Ive met racial jews that renounced their religion and lived as Catholics, using all their resources to the glory of Jesus Christ. These very few unicorn jews had many children and a few are priests today. These jews should be elevated as heroes for their brethren to follow, as the first step towards cleansing themselves from the curse of rejecting Jesus Christ and working to erase God for millenia.

[ - ] SumerBreeze 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:18:55 ago (+2/-2)

Those who reject Jesus are the Satanists/jews, doesn’t matter what you call them, and even then, Jesus never used the word JEW as it was created 300 years after His death; every Bible that uses the word Jew is a mistranslation and should be thrown out (yes even the King James Version which is popular here).

Stupid people like you who believe in the kike trick of antisemitism will never learn.

[ - ] ZeudesJesucifer -4 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:02:53 ago (+0/-4)*

Lol sure guy, you keep bashing that jew hate maybe it'll pay off sometime this century. I think we can all agree that hating all jews, not satanists, has been such a productive use of white time, not at all self defeating or a trap of any kind. White people have their shit together for sure.....What an organised, focused group of valiant warriors we all are. Any minute now we're going to retake our lands from the globalists, we just need to hate jews harder and make no distinction between the average jew and an elite satanist. It's what Soros would want isn't it? For us to keep seeing him as a Jew so he can play the antisemite card? Fucking idiot.

And his name wasn't Jesus either but who gives af.

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:41:02 ago (+2/-0)

The jew Maurice Samuel's book You Gentiles is a good explanation of the Jew and how the talmud makes their entire existence revolve around what others are doing. It's why they're going to lose Israel. It's why they're losing the slim facade of support they rely on from higher office in the West. It's the egomania the talmud teaches them that's been bred into them for thousands of years.

https://www.amazon.ca/You-Gentiles-Maurice-Samuel/dp/1366841948

You'll end up living in Antarctita with no contact from the rest of the world who does NOT need you, and does not want you. You need us and your religion can'r even exist without us, because you actually believe the world must answer to you.

Your insanity is an obscenity because every single person on the planet would be happier and beter off without you. Why can't you get that? Fuck off

[ - ] ZeudesJesucifer -4 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:57:25 ago (+0/-4)*

Do all Jews follow the Talmud?

No, I'm not an elite, not even Jewish, well, I did shred my foreskin to bits ploughing this fine lass when I was 18, maybe that makes me a jew? Meh.

Nah, can't fuck off. God's orders. He outranks you by a little bit.

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:16:24 ago (+2/-0)

That's not god talking to you you retard, that's schizophrenia

[ - ] ZeudesJesucifer -2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:37:58 ago (+0/-2)

Maybe, fucknut. Maybe.

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:08:58 ago (+2/-0)

Satanists, frankists, sabbateans, zionists, marxists, globalists, bankers, randian objectivists, crowleyites - awful lot of ways to say jew without saying jew. Many are not satanic but are still evil because they are jews.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 06:56:30 ago (+3/-0)

One's lore and the other is law.

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 06:57:55 ago (+0/-0)

Which one?

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 5 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 07:04:12 ago (+5/-0)

torah is kike lore, talmud is kike law.

[ - ] SumerBreeze -3 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:24:36 ago (+0/-3)

Less than 5% of the people focused on in the Torah are kikes.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 3 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:11:12 ago (+3/-0)

I don't care.

[ - ] Spaceman84 3 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:42:15 ago (+4/-1)

Christfag cope. It's all (((Abrahamism)))

[ - ] Spaceman84 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:41:08 ago (+2/-0)

Christians and Muslims use the Torah as a foundational text as well.

[ - ] Razzoriel -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:26:01 ago (+0/-1)

"Christians" is a very broad term.

[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 07:37:24 ago (+3/-1)

jew ear rape vs jew eye rape

A better question is what is the difference between the (((Bible))) and the (((Torah))).

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 07:54:50 ago (+0/-0)

OK. Can you elaborate?

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:05:46 ago (+3/-2)

Do you notice any books that are the same?

The bible is just another full-blown jew book.

[ - ] SumerBreeze -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:22:15 ago (+1/-2)

Every book is a jew book because it is attacked and mistranslated now?

Jesus calling out the kikes and saying pedophiles should be drowned is pretty solid.

[ - ] Conspirologist [op] 2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:37:35 ago (+2/-0)

Jews always say righteous words in order to gain trust from unaware people. The point is not what's written in the Bible, but who controls the religion.

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:53:17 ago (+0/-1)

The religion is the original Bible and it isn't controlled by anyone.

Many of the modern day churches are Babylonian churches controlled by jews and specifically discussed in the Bible.

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:15:43 ago (+1/-1)

Mistranslated from what, hebrew? Fuck outta here jew book lover.

[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 09:45:09 ago (+0/-0)

Typically jews criticize the old testament and their own fucked up god, because there's nothing they can attack in the New Testament and the Christian God. It's another thing that gives jews away on the internet. A tell.

It's like as if they don't even know it's koine Greek, and think it's hebrew

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 10:08:43 ago (+1/-0)

Typically christcucks will deny reality and figure the jew loan book the bible has nothing to do with judaism, in spite of containing several books in near identical sumisation.

It is also as if christucks deny reality to maintain their cope by failing to recognise the bible was originally scripted in hebrew before being exported to Greece. That jesus was an anglicization of the super jewy name yeshua who spoke aramaic, a semitic based language.

The Septuagint Bible arose in the 3rd century B.C., when the Hebrew Bible, or Old Testament, was translated then into Greek from hebrew texts.

Derivatives of the bible still exist and are practiced by other sand niggers that are written in aramaic, such as syriac that have maintaned levantine language and cultural connections of the original word and meaning of the bible. Well before it got edited to better appeal to the White retards that think a jew book is infact about Europeans.

A tell for sure that people doubling down that the bible is not jewy are either mentally handicapped, cowards and traitors or infact jews themselves.

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:57:32 ago (+0/-1)

The new Testament was originally written in Greek, not Hebrew.

And the modern day jew doesn't follow the Talmud or the Hebrew Bible. They follow the Talmud, which is satanic and in direct opposition to God's law as put forth in the Hebrew Bible.

The people you claim to hate, hate the Christian God, Christ, and his followers.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 08:22:19 ago (+2/-2)

what is the difference between the (((Bible))) and the (((Torah))).

Night and day. But you wouldn't know because you've never bothered to read the shit before you criticize it.

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 10:17:13 ago (+2/-1)

Torah has five books including Genesis, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Exodus and Leviticus, the Bible has a total of 66 books, 27 New Testament books, and 39 Old Testament books.

How many books in the Tanakh are represented in the Bible?
What percentage of bible is purely 100% unadulterated and complete jew creative writing? (1:1 jew holy book copies)
What books of the Torah are in the Bible?
What books of the Nevi'Im are in the Bible?
What books of the Ketuvium are in the Bible?
What other jew holy books are published in the (((bible)))?

But you wouldn't know because you are a jew book loving retard. You should endeavour to find out before your make a further fool of yourself and find yourself outside the gates of the future White ethnostate begging to come in.

Why do middle American bible belt book bashers, with room temp IQ, and complete spastics, actually believe that one criticising the bible is due to ignorance? Why would you assume I haven't read it?

[ - ] NaturalSelectionistWorker 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:15:36 ago (+1/-0)

Are there really 66 books in the bible? Gives order 66 a new meaning. The kikes just love their numerological bullshit don't they?

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 10:45:55 ago (+2/-3)

Why would you assume I haven't read it?

Because, just like every muther fucker that criticizes the Bible, you constantly say shit that is simply not true.

You say you've read it (or did you?) but can't seem to grasp that the whole fucking new Testament is about rejecting judaism and warning Christians about the fake jew, the synagogue of Satan, and the Babylon church.

[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 10:54:31 ago (+1/-0)

Assuming that the bible is fact a rejection of judaism and not a schism of it is brianlet cope.

Pointing out the basis and fundamentals of the bible as being identifiably and provably jewish is jewish?
What because it detracts away from the collaboration of Whites with heebs to extend a continuation of jew base creation myth perpetuating a millennia of jew made lies that it becomes an identifiable White creation?

Is that the angle you are going with that makes the (((bible))) sound unjewy or less jewy, because a perceived White creation myth based on jew brain farts about desert travelers is less jewy?

This is a brand new cope from christcuck mental midgets.

Even the New Testament is jewy as fuck.

The books of the New Testament were written in first- or second-century Palestine, a region that at the time was under the rule of the Roman Empire. Many of the stories are based on the rituals and beliefs of Judaism, as Jesus Christ and his disciples were all Jews.

13 of the 27 books of the New Testament were attributed to Paul the Apostle. Saul a super jew that refused on severla occasions to even eat with us goyim.

The pages of the New Testament clearly follow the framework of Judaism. The first four books, the gospels, addressed a Jewish audience.

Everything about the entire bible is completey jew, jew, jew jewy jew jew. There is nothing anywhere in the bible that is not jewy at any stage of writing. It is and has always been about jews doing jew shit to other jews with jew friends having jew fights about jew sheckels.

Your life is a dark age jewish sitcom ffs.

Go and answer my questions that you skipped, before you prattle off more jew defense drivel.

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:10:27 ago (+1/-2)

Assuming that the bible is fact a rejection of judaism and not a schism of it is brianlet cope.

It's not an assumption, it's clearly stated and part of the lessons of Saul/Paul, who was treated viciously by the jews for his insistence that judaism should be rejected. And because it is a complete rejection, it's not a schism.

"Framework" my ass and the audience is all of mankind, but specifically Judea, which is not "da joos".

And, Revelations is about modern times, not the dark ages.

See? It's like you've never read the fucking thing.

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 17:00:14 ago (+0/-0)

Real retard hours. Doesnt know waht schism is.
Doesnt know the period when it was created or by whom.
Doesnt realise White men dont come from the sand bowl.
Didn't read a fucking thing.

So sad, many such cases of this pathetic level of cope.

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 18:41:49 ago (+0/-0)

Nigger, I know perfectly well what a schism is. I know where Aryians came from. Mary was most likely Aryian. And I've read enough to know that you're full of shit.

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 19, 2022 04:12:21 ago (+0/-0)

Mary was most likely Aryian.

lol the copes never end.

Mary the jewish prostitute was a jew, it is even said in the bible she is a jew. jewishness is passed on matrilineally so therefore yeshua/jesus was a jew.

And I've read enough to know that you're full of shit.

Is English your first language? You are soundign like you have a severe brain impediment.

Aryans aren't semites, you clearly don't know what either of them are. Maybe you're Palestinian and think your an a good honest White Aryan?

[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 19, 2022 06:41:29 ago (+0/-0)

Mary the jewish prostitute was a jew,

You're confusing Mary Magdelane with Mary of Nazareth ya dumb muther fucker.

Nazareth is the Northern most part of biblical Israel, 25 miles from the Sea of Galilee. Even today, it has almost no jews in it.

Aryans aren't semites, but Mary was likely Aryian.

[ - ] FacelessOne -2 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:46:46 ago (+0/-2)

The Hardened Hearts of the Atheists here will work in everywhere to reject God while simultaneously hating Him so vehemently they will argue pilpul endlessly.

This is the exact example of a Useful Idiot as described in the Communist Manifesto and the Protocols of Zion.

You needn't worry about them, their path is there own.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 12:26:18 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] zongongo 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 18, 2022 11:43:34 ago (+1/-1)

One is for women and children.

[ - ] Name 0 points 1.8 yearsAug 20, 2022 09:19:02 ago (+0/-0)

Women children…and the goy