Sign into an existing account

Equality was always only ever a clever ruse to allow those without supremacy to seize it from those who possess it by tricking them into giving it up.

It was only ever a way to progress towards the destruction of those who will accept another group as being equal to themselves.

For whites, it was only our people who have had a majority that has been so naïve as to accept unwisely to give up our power and share a lowered role in society with those unlike us, and now we see the final form of equality.

We are now being made to live beneath the supremacy of all those whom we had been so foolish as to accept as our equals prioritize your people over others: if you are a male then you should seek to gain and keep power over females, if white, over all who are not white, if gentile, over those who are jewish, if straight, over those who are not straight, if Christian, over those who are not Christian. Etc.

Failing to prioritize your own group supremacy is in effect advocating for your groups to be placed in a position of inferiority.

I'm sure there are true believers of all races who want a world where everyone can live in peace, but they should keep in mind that those they rally around are not unlikely to be just using the cause of equality as a stepping stone to destroying the dominance of a group that they could be made inferior to other groups instead.

For white people this is what has occurred in our homelands and the lands founded for us in other parts of the world, this has been the method by which we were intended to be wiped out in a transparent plan conceived by a select few of the wealthiest and most powerful jewish people, and put into operation by those who occupy the aristocratic upper crust of our world.

We've been disempowered politically, discriminated against institutionally and on all other levels of society, and had our productivity taken from us by force to be transferred to those of other races, and after all this, we are still defamed with slander and libel that we are the ones who have it easiest because we are uniquely barred from openly expressing the fact that we feel persecuted for our race.

The funny thing is, despite us being further defamed as being this irrationally hostile threat to other races, it is all happening to us precisely because the people in charge know we won't respond with violence or other expression of outrage when we see others of our kind being mistreated, if we were expected to do so, as is the case with almost every other racial group, then they wouldn't be as willing to persecute us and lie about us so.

History is used as a weapon against us, by selectively exposing people to only the bad things done by whites towards other races while simultaneously hiding the times other races had done bad or worse things to whites or each other, they produce the misconception of white people as being inherently worse in the moral sense than all other races, this misconception is encouraged and straight up promoted in our culture, to the point where it is just assumed by most people as being the way things are and always were, no doubt this has led so many people to develop a prejudice and hatred towards white people, even causing widespread self-hatred among those who are white themselves, the degree of trauma inflicted by this deliberate institutionalized incitement of racial hatred towards one race of people cannot be overlooked, this is a great crime against white people all on it's own.

Either we tell the whole truth and move onto a society where everyone is given truly equal treatment, or we move onto an older and more instinctual paradigm were everyone looks out chiefly for those who are most similar to themselves, we can eradicate discrimination or we could accept it as not being the evil that we assume it is.

Seeing how the former pursuit was used to effectively turn everyone against one race, I'm not optimistic about the idea of pursuing true equality.

Besides, I have other causes for cynicism, in that once we have a world of true equality, and I'm talking a full clean start that removes all advantages which are not genetic, one where everyone owns nothing and we have a brand new generation tat has learned nothing from the previous ones (including by records), we will see the natural differences in ability among the individuals of different racial backgrounds start to show themselves far more blatantly than they currently do, we will see far more successful white people than black, and far more black people in prison than white, because white people have a higher amount of talented individuals and black people have a higher amount of criminal individuals.

I'd also much rather have the latter option, because it reintroduces a darwinistic element into things, which is needed so that humanity could continue to improve, and to limit the population down to manageable levels.

This idea of egalitarianism is an experiment, a historical aberration, and the results aren't good, while there were some initial signs that such a world could conceivably work out, we found that those bits of positivity dissipated rather quickly, it's an unstable system, one that undergoes entropy as problems crop up and things get worse until we see the rise of open conflict as a result, the problems cannot even be addressed, not only do all solutions but allowing for separation not work, they have the inevitable effect of making things even worse, the issues aren't few either, diversity just makes everything worse.

The experiment has failed, and now we must clean up the mess left behind as a result of it, which I think would be best accomplished by simply going back to the model of competition we had for all those years before the 1960s, and let people naturally find a place for themselves in the world, even if it's among a group exclusively composed of their own race, that's the group they've chosen for themselves to live amongst.

I don't think there's anything wrong with people of different races being able to live among each other or interact in any way they choose (including race mixing), so long as it's their choice in doing so, even if the results are bad, it's their personal decisions, and I will respect that.

What I absolutely oppose is forcing people to live or interact with those whom they do not wish to, you could try to argue that this is an unavoidable part of life, but I'd come back with two points: First, that what I'm speaking about is the government forcing diversity on people, which implies that without government involvement there to make decisions on it's citizens behalf, that there wouldn't be diversity there. Second, that if being forced to be around people you don't want to be around is to be accepted because it's unavoidable, then why is expressing your dislike of those people on the basis of their race not accepted as well? racist thoughts are natural, so why are we forcing people to keep those hidden?

This brings me to another point, that you can't fight racism or prejudice, and you aren't fighting it, either, because you can't, when ever someone says anything about fighting racism or being against it, what they are actually doing is fighting the expressions of racism, the racism will never go away because it's a natural instinct, it's a part of human nature ingrained in us by millenia of natural selection, and it's mainly thoughts and feelings that spring up of their own accord even in those who oppose them the most, in fact, it seems that anti-racists are the ones who are most often having racist thoughts and feelings, while projecting them onto others in an adamant denial of them.

Kind of reminiscent of the claims that leaders of churches who campaigned hard against homophilia were trying to conceal that they were homophiles themselves, often projecting their own faggotry and dykery onto others in the process, you all know what I'm talking about here, at one point it was kind of a big deal.