The Great Conspiracy is not that hard to understand. As you'd expect, it stems from greedy, undeserving individuals who assert creeping authoritarianism to steal from the people of the world; your money, your quality of life, your very destiny.
There is a great web of slime that is being used to guide you and your communities into acting against your own self-interests for the benefit of greedy, undeserving usurpers of natural law.
You are the target. You have already been manipulated in a lot of invisible ways that you normally would never think about. If you've made it to this presentation, the fact that you have some understanding and are somewhat accepting that human organizations are corruptible and communicate at you from a position of ulterior motives (likely, through no fault of your own and is just due to intellect, disposition and personality), you are on a "side."
https://i.imgur.com/6jIMhKz.pngThis variable; this ability to notice covert tactics; this human characteristic is targeted for extermination.
https://imgur.com/9ejXpjG.pngThere has been an ongoing war throughout human history between those who want to enslave and those who want to be free; a war that continues to this day and has reached a critical stage, through technology, that seeks to establish a permanent enslavement of the mind of every individual.
https://imgur.com/25v70rz.pngNow that you know you're drafted, certain Internet movements you have fallen into might start to make a lot more sense; efforts to co-opt your "side" are persistent, splintered across many mediums, and ongoing.
https://imgur.com/MPptugt.pngThe Q tards lost their minds when I posted the IamQ email address from 2016.
https://searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3130351[email protected] 34db7ed52753394de58d0f72a8c49bd7
[email protected] curtis999
[email protected] geujVdbWf
[email protected] angel1
[email protected] pk3x7w9W
These are far from the only ones... and they are from before Q got started on the chans; indicating a "plan" in place in 2016.
The QTards on Voat included flat earthers among their ranks. The flat earthers were the first red flag that something was not right.
Notice what happened when Crensch was allowed free reign to manipulate votes on Voat and when Putt took a back seat. Crensch was also making weird promises to mods like Vindicator that he had some kind of inside track with Putt. If he did have an inside track, it was to shut down Hunter Biden evidence.
https://searchvoat.co/v/ProtectVoat/4091371Remember, the people who don't want you to read my material are the same "Patriots" who downvoted and suppressed Hunter Biden data on Voat.
Not only that, I warned on the Poalcast about Jan 6 being a potential "bad jacketing" operation to make Q tards look like dangerous traitors. Voat and the Q movement washed away at the same time, just prior to Jan 6.
https://searchvoat.co/v/Censorship/4120519Even on the Q Research board on 8chan wiped all the Hunter data.
https://8kun.top/qpatriotresearch/res/15848.htmlHere is an explanation of how Crensch and the Q tards were using Mossad tactics and drama spamming to "split" research groups and destroy cohesion. They only want simps in their circles.
https://searchvoat.co/v/ProtectVoat/3249228Seeing as how the attack on my site, within a minute of my post on /v/pizzagate, originated from
QinetiQ, I started to have the sneaking suspicion that QinetiQ might be participating with the Q Group.
[email protected] goatblower
This is when Crensch's QTard crew got really upset about doxxing...
https://i.imgur.com/YHMJnnP.png[email protected] goatblower
[email protected] trolling
[email protected] babydoll
[email protected] babydoux
[email protected] thematrix
[email protected] scorpio
[email protected] 69tuchita6985
[email protected] rudem00d
[email protected] picojode
[email protected] Empire
[email protected] Peachfield1
[email protected] PhantomF4J
[email protected] unicorns
[email protected] iamking357
[email protected] 4076911_NyJy
[email protected] dad1234
[email protected] dogsoldiers
[email protected] Tugb0at1
[email protected] gobble!
[email protected] biscuit
[email protected] stargate
[email protected] wunderkind
[email protected] lemon73
[email protected] hogdog
[email protected] stegosaur
[email protected] catdog
[email protected] MPMtopologyMPM
[email protected] bishop
[email protected] Jellybaby1
[email protected] agentorange
[email protected] gothic1
[email protected] electrolube
[email protected] tigercub
[email protected] lollipop01
[email protected] Maxdomcarmen1
[email protected] montanaismyname
[email protected] 7955265186z
Later, it was exposed that SITE Intelligence, a Mossad cut out, was also operating on Voat and Poal and they are here, at Talk.Lol. Mossad is here, now, and they admit to it. Can you guess which users fit the profile?
We also see from OSINT manuals that the European Action Group also used Voat and searchvoat was listed as one of their research resources. It is heavily implied that 5 Eyes participate, as well, as that is where the EAG comes in.
THIS material is why you see the crybabies come out in force to attack my information.
The easiest way to spot them is by their behavior.
THAT is what Crensch doesn't want you to know... that he is a shill and that his friends are also shills and their tantrums and drama are part of a psyop that they run to keep everyone angry and distract from actual research.
[ + ] midnightshower
[ - ] midnightshower 4 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:34:14 ago (+4/-0)
Here is archive of this group ping, in case you will deny.
https://archive.ph/uHFO5
Is Crensch in this group too?
I think your explanation of why you are in same group with Rothschild is important specially, bc this SaveSequim I heard attempted to doxx Searchvoat guy, after he posted that letter on SVF.
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 14:09:49 ago (+0/-2)*
But, imagine digging for a random ping to slide the actual information I present. Your effort to discredit me is... well, it's obvious you're grasping at straws. What about my eBook makes it so that you feel the need to make up a dumb angle to discredit me?
Mike Rothschild is another Q Tard... though on the opposite end of the spectrum. He always claimed Q was fake, but he intentionally got a lot of facts wrong about it.
I get pinged on all kinds of stuff. Maybe you should include how they tried to drag me into "MIGA" (Make Iran Great Again), even though I had zero interest.
I don't actually interact with any of these pings...
@weve_read
@QOrigins
@FluorescentGrey
@ATafoyovsky
@laura_greenaura
@a_papasavva
@_MAArgentino
@SK1LLLS
@CullenHoback
@FantasticGvnFox
@gumby4christ
@QuacksAnonymous
@PokerPolitics
@travis_view
@rothschildmd
@Prism_Metanews
@AlxnderThaGr8
@MichaelJCat1
@HousatonicLive
@webofslime
So... it's weird you'd assume that I have anything to do with them.
Go ahead... check all my "pings". Most of them are pretty random.
Basically, you're reaching. The eBook speaks for itself.
I did converse with... SaveSequim, who has an interest in the origins of Q.
The Origins of Q are not a partisan issue. Of course actual Leftists should be interested, but the second they realize Democrats are involved at the top, they shy away. Generally, the Leftists who have worked to expose Q insist on painting it as a bunch of rabid white supremacists... this is the portrait that Mike Rothschild likes to paint.
Like Megyn Kelly doing a softball interview with James Alefantis, Mike Rothschild has carefully avoided important questions regarding Q. I don't even think he's an actual Rothschild... but I did check out some of his information, early on. He was such a rabid lefty, that it's laughable anyone would try to bad jacket him with me.
If that's your aim... it's a dumb one.
"Voat guy"? Doxx? Do you mean the same people who doxed me and then got upset when I did it right back?
Are you really going to use the tired trope that it's okay for me to be doxed, but doxing the people who doxed me is bad?
First of all, I didn't dox anyone; they doxxed themselves because they used their Facebook accounts to interface with Voat users. They were already collecting information on Voat users before I came along.
AFTER srayzie's nudes began to come out and AFTER katharszo already doxed srayzie, I took it to the next level by providing additional PUBLIC information.
I also noted poor opsec on the part of a handful of Voaters, but never doxed them.
But yeah... it's okay to dox me... so I don't understand the hate over doxers. You guys hate it when I am rumored to have doxed, but don't hate it when I'm doxed.
It's shillery 101. DARVO tactics 101. It's a shill red herring.
OSINT makes it easy to dox anyone. Privacy on the Internet does not exist. The fake outrage against me is more properly directed at Google who is providing everyone's dox. Truepeoplesearch. Maltego. SEON. The list goes on and on.
And the Voat User SaveSequim seems interested in? Vindicator? Is another shill who looked at srayzie's tits and swooned and had no problem doxing his enemies. So... why is it okay for Vindicator to engage in behavior of bad actors? Why is it okay for everyone else, but not me?
Because it's a shill red herring to avoid anyone from reading the actual information about political corruption at the highest levels of power; it is global; it is targeting children.
But here you are... taking the conversation all over the place with THIN accusations about a ping that I had nothing to do with originating? And had no reaction to?
Vindicator is pathetic loser whose dox would reach irrelevancy the moment they hit the web. Literally nobody would do anything to Vindicator except make fun if his weight and repeated "attempts" at weight loss, trying to get under that 260 mark. Srayzie's dox also proved to be irrelevant, immediately, though some imgflip memes still exist with her nudes in them. If Srayzie didn't want her nudes out, then she shouldn't have sent them to every pervert on Voat. Fortunately, I was never in receipt of them. I can't be blamed. Remember when they thought it was okay to dox TexasVet and harp on it?
They think it's funny. In truth, you guys think doxing is funny, unless it's you... and, the truth is... nobody would care if you guys were doxxed, because you're nonces who produce nothing of value.
ANYTHING but Hunter Biden, the shadowy origins of Q and the global corruption, right?
Are you not sliding the topic?
[ + ] midnightshower
[ - ] midnightshower 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 17:28:17 ago (+0/-0)*
If you want to research (if you don't know already), check what connects snoonet and reddit
https://support.snoonet.org/
https://snoonet.org/
https://snoonet.org/community/
then you will see owner is London Trust Media
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17375831
They opened and closed many projects, one of them was Edon Garden (that is deleted now wherever I check, but for sure somewhere is history of events regarding London Trust Media. For sure amounts of money you can't fight, I think on this level: https://theconversation.com/gamestop-how-redditors-played-hedge-funds-for-billions-and-what-might-come-next-154076
which may be why that person picked Rothschild name on twatt, even if he is not one (idk that, I assume it).
I don't care about Q sorry, that was a tool, they divided you with that and pushed lots of idiots under twitter surveillance with it, ended pizzagate research, meanwhile wasting your time, as I see it.
I just deleted my account with all info on this site bc of that, because I can't trust @system anymore, I don't want to be on same website where the owner thinks nudity or porn is same as pedophile content, and makes fucking disable tag for that. i better not say anything else, irl I'd try to kick some butts, but it's not me to say I feel. So this is my last comment here, if someone will make more trusted site, I'll be there. bye.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 4 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:30:23 ago (+4/-0)
My doctor says I should avoid pasta because cholesterol or something.
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:52:21 ago (+0/-2)*
Can you shills be anymore obvious? Your group and their vote manipulation scheme is exactly what makes talk.lol useless to nearly everyone.
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:55:00 ago (+2/-0)
But you already know this, so why do you do it?
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 14:13:18 ago (+0/-2)*
They are part of an illegal RICO scheme to cover for corruption and they belong in jail.
Should there ever be a day when justice is served, even if in small portions, it is important to remember that these psychos protect child rapists.
But, more than that, they and their cohorts... people they don't even realize they participate with... have come after me and my family. Should the day come when I get a chance to expose them, I will. I've already started at the other end. It isn't even because I have a choice.
If I do nothing, my life will be torn apart by these people who play being victims. "Just ignore" them isn't really an option because then I get served with lawsuits, my kids get targeted by the New York Times, they try to convince family members to help destroy my life.
They've made it pretty personal.
Point being, I have to point out the bad actors and document what really happens when you try to write about corruption. I am faced with "just ignore them" at every juncture... and I listened. But, then they do things like get my site taken down. They attack me. Then, to cover their tracks, they pretend like I'm the bad guy.
I need to take the opportunity to point out that they are, in fact, a lot worse than just shit posters.
By posting contrary information, it is a lot easier to explore strategies and tactics on how to pre-emptively deal with psychos like Crensch and Vindicator and Srayzie. The truth is that SBBH, as a whole, doesn't attack me.
Watch the numbers. It's a handful of bad actors that are focused on splitting research groups. They descend on good research like locusts and destroy trust and goodwill. The second you start bringing up ways to hold them accountable, their psychopathy reveals itself whereas most people would "just ignore it."
I have a better eBook ready, but, ultimately, I had to do a test run to see how it would get attacked so that I could "pre-bunk" these idiots.
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 16:23:56 ago (+0/-0)
Of course they are, but the reality is we can both accept the average person is too stupid to care.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:02:20 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:22:01 ago (+0/-2)
Are we to interpret your approach to my content as originating from a "bad actor" or a "good actor"?
Would you say that the person in the picture resembles a young Zelensky?
https://pic8.co/sh/hURUIA.png
Compare with this video.
https://rumble.com/vw7898-ukrainian-president-volodymyr-zelensky-in-a-gay-show-.html
Is there are reason you chose the "young zelensky" picture? Because, according to your Friend Finder page, it doesn't really line up with the age.
And do all you losers play Minecraft and Roblox? Or are you on these platforms specifically to talk to kids?
https://mcuuid.net/?q=lord_nougat
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:28:26 ago (+1/-0)
You're clearly a genius at winning hearts and minds.
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:53:15 ago (+0/-2)
And you accuse me of making a Minecraft account for you? Wow, man. That's a bit of a stretch.
That's what you want us to believe?
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:54:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 14, 2022 14:45:19 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 1 point 1.7 yearsAug 14, 2022 14:51:03 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GoatWarVet
[ - ] GoatWarVet 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 14, 2022 19:15:45 ago (+2/-0)
Weird that he didn't post anything on poal about his book. That used to be where he hung out all the time and would go on that podcast thing they used to do over there. I butted heads with him on old voat and never could tell if he was just a bit schizo or some operator fishing for info.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 14:53:38 ago (+3/-0)
If no is interested in your book, leave it alone. At this point, you're being a troll. I have no idea how many alts you have, but MasterSuppressionTechnique seems to be one of them.
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 15:05:14 ago (+0/-2)
That makes it YOUR shilling, and YOUR tantrums.
I am merely addressing your narrative that YOU brought up. It's weird that you are NOW worried about me showing how you are engaged in a disinformation campaign... which happens to be a topic in the book. OFFTOPIC!!! TROLL!!!
Nobody is buying it, man. You've outed yourself.
And don't worry. I don't expect to make a dime from my eBook... I have other books that Amazon won't ban from their book store.
It does serve as a useful topic to expose bad actors because of the information in the book.
I didn't turn the topic of the book into how you Roblox and Minecraft losers shill, but you showed up and demanded to have the conversation, anyways.
So, I ask... why, NOW, are you crying about me addressing the topics YOU raised?
Your circlejerk is officially complete, where you're now complaining about the contents of your own comments.
Notice that the number of views far outweigh the number of votes and participating users, in this conversation. There is, apparently, a lot more interest than you're willing to admit.
In the end, OF COURSE, I am interested in seeing how different groups on the Internet respond to different types of information. Not just an eBook.
My entire shtick is about making posts on all platforms to reveal what the shills come after. Hence... here you are. I've been doing it for years and I've explained my methods and results for years.
Mostly, the response to my work is very positive. That's why it is a red flag when I come to "alt right" corners of the Internet who have the opposite reaction. It shows you aren't alt right, you're just shills.
/r/WorldPolitics is a good example of what you are trying to do... they just bury a normal forum in shitposts so that it becomes unusable to people seeking useful information.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 4 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 15:08:28 ago (+4/-0)
It's not to troll you, I'll tell you that. It's to say a lot of people remember you from old Voat and think you were a bad actor there and are being a bad actor now.
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 15:14:39 ago (+0/-2)
You've presented zero evidence that I'm a bad actor. You paint me as a troll, though you're the one incapable of having an honest conversation. You paint me as incorporating off topic information, when you're the people bringing the off topic info into the conversation.
So... remind us... other than baseless accusations... how I'm a bad actor? I'm doxxed. It's not like my life is a secret. I'm completely open about my research and sources. I always have been.
And the only people criticizing me? Are flat earth Q tards. THAT is the company you keep. So, why should we truist you when you say that I'm a bad actor... with zero evidence?
What proof do you have? Because we have all the proof we need you're the bad actor, as far as I can tell. You jumped right into the role of suppressing information that you could have easily ignored.
Don't worry... there's a lot of other ways to expose you. But, you're doing a fine job exposing yourself.
You want to pretend to be reasonable, all of the sudden? Where's your evidence of your claims? What, specifically, in my presentation is incorrect information? I look forward to a non-shill reply.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 15:16:15 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 15:51:03 ago (+0/-2)
I do think the information in the book is good.
A little help fact checking would be great... constructive criticism.
Any kind of genuine feedback would be great.
But that's not what is going on, here, is it?
Conversations, here, must pass through your gatekeeping, where you and a few others are camping on new and controlling what gets to "hot" and not. But, this is a slow enough moving board, people might still find my post at "new." So, you have to play a little game, you and your friends.
It's subversive censorship and, yes, of course, I'm going to point it out when you do it because it's your full time job. While I can account for my life and that I'm just a guy trying to get to the truth, you and your little pals can't really manage that. Why is that?
I'm not a bad actor and it is already known.
Any group of researchers is subjected to tension based strategies designed to split groups and you're the people doing it. You spew hate and bile and engage in retard sophistry and keep everything steered towards degeneracy.
It is obvious and this is the obvious time and place to point it out; because your group is opposed to the information in book work coming out.
If you weren't so obvious at playing gatekeeper, then we wouldn't be having this conversation.
But... it's important to call you out for what you are.
The number of views versus the number of people participating in this conversation show that there are eyes on this conversation. Why wouldn't I expose you, here and now?
Why wouldn't I point out that @system doesn't even have to be in on your little scheme for you to control his site with voting chicanery. For all your dox talk, nobody ever seems concerned @system will dox them. Could he? Sure. But why?
Your hypocrisy is plain for the world to see. Sure, maybe regular talk lolis will move along... but when others come to search to see the response... they will see you and what you are doing.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 16:13:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:19:51 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:44:02 ago (+0/-2)
What reason would you have for such a thing? Most people ignore posts that have no relevance to themselves.
What is it about you, that the information in my eBook causes you to hunt down mentions on the Internet, within moments of appearing, to try to convince others not to read it?
Could it be that you are actually a shill? One who plays Roblox and Fortnite?
Looks like you got banned from Wikipedia; an IP ban, no less. Is that your real IP?
I have to assume most of these Diggernicks on the Internet who are playing Fortnite and Roblox are the same person.
https://pastebin.com/P69pQrtA
Have you ever purchased "Natrol L-Arginine 3000 mg Sexual Health 90 Tablets"? That might help others narrow it down.
Oh weird... you have Q "art" on your Deviant Art account.
https://www.deviantart.com/diggernicks
Why does that not surprise me?
You're a Flat Earth Q Tard.
https://pic8.co/sh/eM8uDV.png
And you don't want the truth about Q coming out.
And that is why you seethe.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:45:19 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:53:25 ago (+0/-2)
It's pretty obvious who you are.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:00:39 ago (+3/-0)
Obv
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:06:20 ago (+0/-2)
You like to draw attention to black phalluses. What group of people do we know that does that?
You hate on information that exposes corruption. What group of people do we know that does that?
You rely on shill tactics, rather than genuine discussion. What group of people do we know who does that?
You love to call out entire races as bad actors... but you never actually manage to name specific names or specific crimes; like you're participating in a limited hangout. What group of people do we know who does that?
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 13:08:19 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:27:18 ago (+2/-0)
You also used to claim Q was real and now changed it to "Q plagiarized me".
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 12:49:38 ago (+0/-2)*
You're such an obvious bad actor and it is a good opportunity to point out that talk.lol is not usable by the average person because these agents intentionalyl attack anything that isn't part of the narrative.
"HeyJames" has never produced any type of respectable research and, when cornered, engages in defamation per se, calling people he doesn't like "pedophiles".
Your use of vote manipulation pegs you as a shill and a bad actor.
Notice that you only ever engage in "shoot the messenger" logical fallacy against my work, where you try to discredit me, as my information and conclusions are sound and well sourced.
Your posts reveal nothing but a toddler throwing a tantrum about information you don't like because you are, functionally, a moron who pretends to be a pseudointellectual on the Internet.
So... now that you've had your tantrum, are we to expect you to further refuse to engage in the evidence and conclusions presented? Are you just going to concern troll?
Because that's what shills do... they concern troll.
And your little talk loli group is camping on new, gatekeeping everything that comes through, and orchestrate fake little conversations and fake little dramas to subversively censor.
You used vote chicanery on Voat and other sites, and you use vote chicanery, now.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 14:49:11 ago (+2/-0)
Have you ever considered that maybe people just don't like you?
[ + ] webofslime
[ - ] webofslime [op] -1 points 1.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 15:55:57 ago (+0/-1)
The real value is showing how bad actors gatekeep containment boards to prevent politically sensitive topics from becoming popular; like you're doing, now.