Sign into an existing account

[ - ] system [op] 17 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:37:04 ago (+20/-3)

You can block any user you'd like, as well as any sub you'd like. But no, I am not going to start a witch hunt based on accusations/assumptions.

[ + ] mikenigger

[ - ] mikenigger 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 06:58:17 ago (+4/-0)

no i don't go that site for pedo content, i block those i swear!

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:44:48 ago (+2/-1)*

deleted

[ + ] White_Pride_Cis

[ - ] White_Pride_Cis 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 16:43:21 ago (+0/-0)

What about the nigger sub. Is that open without looking at jew porn?

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 20:06:42 ago (+0/-0)

That's why he created the tag, so you can distinguish between content with nudity verse other "nsfw". The reddit nsfw concept is weak and not actually suited for sites no one should be on during work anyway which includes both voat and reddit. It's time to move beyond the nsfw concept.

[ + ] Redhairin

[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 02:58:21 ago (+0/-0)

Exactly... what sort of idiot is unaware that shitty bosses have keyloggers and other surveillance apps on company computers? And on the other side of the coin, what sort of scammer expects the boss to pay an hourly wage to do anything on their computers but work?

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:31:16 ago (+5/-6)*

deleted

[ - ] Boardallday3 -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:02:49 ago (+14/-16)

The fact you STILL haven't blocked Blumen4alles makes me hate this gay excuse for voat as much as poal or even that purple website. Cant remember the name. Fucking gay dude. Block that pedophile. People show you proof again and again and again and again he is a pedophile.

He posted underage girls. He admits it. He says it was to "troll" but then says watching "CP" isn't bad.

YOU ALLOW IT.

BAN HIM.

[ - ] sguevar 19 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:09:44 ago (+20/-1)

this gay excuse for voat as much as poal

Compares Talk to Poal and Ruqqus... and holds Voat on a high standard but willingly decides to disregard the fact that on Voat we had the same problem and the same users were present as well.

Block the user, block the user subverses, disable adult content and move on. Your entitlement is not going to fly anywhere on the internet...

You want to know what is ironic? Is that we are still far righter than /Pol lol...

[ - ] Boardallday3 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:48:02 ago (+4/-3)

I blocked his faggot subversives but hes still here and shouldn't be. We should have some standards as white men here.

[ + ] HughBriss

[ - ] HughBriss 13 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:54:41 ago (+17/-4)

Stop it. If you don't like it, make you own board. Then YOU can deal with the whining and bitching from users who don't like that you're not doing it how they like it.

Until then, kindly STFU. And stop barking orders like you have some authority.

[ + ] observation1

[ - ] observation1 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:15:37 ago (+3/-3)

"Awwww, my hero" --System, probably not

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:25:40 ago (+1/-1)

Hugh! You and I, why we be agreeing too much lately!

[ - ] AryanPrime -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:21:23 ago (+0/-1)

because that's a low IQ tier response..."make your own" interesting, when every active attempt to do so is subverted by kikes...just make your own bank...make your own facebook, hey White man, you want your own country? just make it...ignore the fact you did that with America and now here all the shitskins are...pay no attention to the kikes promoting your genocide

Paul...I really hope to meet you IRL one day...it will not end well for you kike

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:40:53 ago (+0/-0)

Post address weak nigger bitch

[ + ] HughBriss

[ - ] HughBriss 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:45:41 ago (+0/-0)

In your mind, creating a message board is equivalent to starting a bank, creating a social media behemoth like faceberg, or somehow finding unclaimed land and creating your own country.

I guess it's impossible then. No one can create a message board. You better tell system that his attempt to create a message board was unsuccessful because it was subverted by kikes.

Also, please don't threaten other users here.

[ + ] Rowdybme

[ - ] Rowdybme 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 15:49:39 ago (+0/-0)

Loser complain about this and that. Winners fuck the prom queen.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 18:40:24 ago (+1/-0)

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/05/us/transgender-homecoming-queen-florida-cec/index.html

I beg to differ.

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 23:22:32 ago (+0/-0)

Trumpman1488! Glad you're around!

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 01:19:00 ago (+0/-0)

AP I'm in a good mood today 'cos HomeDepot restacked its seed potato shelves and I got another packet of seed potatoes. I'm prepping madly. I reckon by the time ww3 is declared I'll be chewing on spuds while the rest of civilisation, including your good self, starves!

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:49:54 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ + ] kammmmak

[ - ] kammmmak 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 07:23:01 ago (+2/-0)

YOU get to control that and block him dumbass

[ - ] Boardallday3 -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:49:42 ago (+1/-2)

Then I'm not aware if I'm on a site with child abuse material on the front page or not. He said he's posted it to troll or something. I will report it and this website to the FBI if I ever see that on here.

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:09:31 ago (+2/-0)

I've reported you for reporting

[ + ] TomMacdonald

[ - ] TomMacdonald 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 19:23:31 ago (+1/-0)

yeah hes talking like a bitch. report that faggot

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:53:45 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ + ] Anus_Expander

[ - ] Anus_Expander 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 08:20:25 ago (+4/-0)

OK, Dungus

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:44:22 ago (+3/-1)

deleted

[ + ] mikenigger

[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 04:51:43 ago (+4/-3)

oy vey, don't be a pedophobe!

[ - ] FacelessOne 8 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:22:29 ago (+11/-3)

Why not just make a pornography tag.

[ - ] system [op] 19 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:35:08 ago (+24/-5)

Because you guys can't handle it. It's easier and less problematic to classify nudity and pornography as one in the same. I do not want to deal with the screeching that would come from "This is porn! blablabla" Or "How is this considered porn?! blablabla".

Does the content feature nudity? Then it needs the tag. Plain and simple.

[ - ] sguevar 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:39:06 ago (+7/-2)

Very wise.
Even when people complain about it, it does draw a clear line.

Well done.

[ + ] FacelessOne

[ - ] FacelessOne 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:41:52 ago (+11/-6)

Sounds an awful lot like SJWs trying to convince me that Pedophilia is a valid sexual orientation.

Don't worry guys Pornography is just "Adult" content.

It's "Degenerate" content for Adults or Children.

How about a "Kike Sponsored Degeneracy" flag?

[ - ] system [op] 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:45:03 ago (+7/-2)

It was originally xxx, I changed it to adult to encompass nudity. Guess I could change it to "mature".

[ + ] HughBriss

[ - ] HughBriss 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:56:36 ago (+5/-1)

Stick to your guns. You're doing a good job.

[ - ] Clubberlang 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:43:04 ago (+3/-1)

Long 🤥 tag

[ + ] FacelessOne

[ - ] FacelessOne 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:44:05 ago (+3/-1)

Accurate though? Maybe just a Star of Rephiam?

[ + ] 2Drunk

[ - ] 2Drunk 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:51:08 ago (+5/-1)

Or a nose?

[ - ] Clubberlang -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:40:07 ago (+0/-1)

I think the emoji gives you fair warning

[ - ] sguevar 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:52:30 ago (+1/-1)

Why would you like to complicate things further? The comparison you are making is not valid. Nudity is considered "adult content", not art.

This is plane and simple. No point in furthering the drama... it really gets old wouldn't you say?

They are degenerates, I agree, we can say it freely without repercussion. Isn't that one of the things we look for in here?

Pedophilia is illegal, if illegal content gets posted it will get banned and so will the user. Bordering legal content, as disgusting it is for us, unfortunately, is legal. Ignore it.

I agree that porn is not speech and certainly not art. I saw one dude use the Venus statue as art. It isn't. It is part of the reason why the greek and roman civilizations fell a part... debauchery.

[ + ] Trumpman9000

[ - ] Trumpman9000 -5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:52:11 ago (+3/-8)

system is okay with pedophiles on this site like bluemenforallies

[ - ] diggernicks 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:58:40 ago (+9/-4)

Trumpman is ok with race mixing

Also hes anti abortion so he clearly loves niggers

[ + ] Trumpman9000

[ - ] Trumpman9000 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:26:55 ago (+5/-5)

I'm suspicious of you being a pedophile as well.

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:36:15 ago (+3/-0)

what I'm not jewish?

[ + ] observation1

[ - ] observation1 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:13:07 ago (+3/-2)

He is a pedophile. Its why he defends it. Proof screenshots have already been shared on voat. He doesn't deny it

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:42:30 ago (+0/-0)

We've gone over this

Denying accusations from crazy people is pointless

[ + ] observation1

[ - ] observation1 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 13:51:13 ago (+0/-0)

Impossible to deny when screenshots exist already, you pedophile.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 15:04:52 ago (+0/-0)

lol

You are mad

Go ahead and cry harder

[ + ] Anus_Expander

[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 08:22:23 ago (+2/-1)

Why do u love niggers tho

[ + ] Spaceman84

[ - ] Spaceman84 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:44:10 ago (+4/-0)

This is fine.

[ - ] MaryXmas 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:27:53 ago (+5/-1)

I though the whole idea of this place was free speech- then the audience grows and demand you censor free speech. Good on you for evading the screeching.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:56:13 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] MaryXmas 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 13:11:44 ago (+1/-0)

Cp is illegal. It is not allowed on any site, per the law. Just like yelling fire in a crowded building is not considered free speech.

[ + ] albatrosv15

[ - ] albatrosv15 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:35:08 ago (+3/-1)

They will find another way to screech.

[ - ] sguevar 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:43:52 ago (+2/-1)

True... this argument will not end... ever.

[ + ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:47:14 ago (+2/-2)

Neat.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 04:31:41 ago (+1/-0)

Yeah that's probably the best way to do it. Some people go apeshit at the first hint of a nipple. Others will scream up and down that their photo of a woman spreading her pussy and shoving an object into it is "art" and not porn.

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 17:38:01 ago (+1/-0)

Maybe it would be helpful for society to understand the line between pornography and erotica, if only to reduce the amount that people talk past each other. Whether people feel that that distinction is important doesn't change the fact that people having diverging definitions for different words leads to conversations that go nowhere.

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 09:34:52 ago (+0/-0)

Having separate nudity and pornography tags would help distinguish the two for legal reasons.

IDK, maybe we are verging on too many tags already. But to be honest I've never like the term NSFW. It's so vague, nobody should be looking at reddit (who came up with the concept) at work anyway. Technically racism is not safe for work and the whole site is mostly NSFW.

[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:41:23 ago (+1/-2)

deleted

[ - ] VicariousJambi 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:45:42 ago (+9/-2)

today jews won

[ - ] diggernicks -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:01:49 ago (+2/-6)

Today christ cuck wannabe internet tough guys lost

[ - ] VicariousJambi 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:04:00 ago (+3/-1)

correct

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:05:16 ago (+2/-2)

At least youre not so weak you try and deny reality like some psychotic democrat

Grats

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:05:25 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:05:32 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] HeyJames 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:39:58 ago (+8/-2)

They could have just blocked certain subs and certain users. The people complaining like the drama

[ - ] UncleDoug 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:11:02 ago (+6/-2)

If child porn becomes a fixture on the site, and you are a member of that site, you are guilty by association whether you have blocked the offensive content or not.

We are not talking about drugs, rape or other offensive content which you could just block, we are talking about CP. It is an abhorrent cultural trait and not natural.

[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 07:10:45 ago (+5/-2)

There is no child porn on this site. What are you talking about?

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:07:14 ago (+1/-2)

There was CP on the site several times. Could you be more of a kiddie fucker?

[ - ] FreeinTX -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:17:00 ago (+1/-2)

Child porn is a felony. Failure to report a felony is a felony. If you've seen child porn on this site, contact the police. Failure to do so makes you a criminal.

Have you contacted the police about this?

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 17:33:10 ago (+1/-0)

Failure to report a felony is not a felony. You never have any obligation to communicate anything to the police ever, for any circumstance. It's an important legal principle to understand in general.

Sorry to go off topic but maybe I'm overly autist and can't not correct something that wrong.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 18:03:09 ago (+1/-0)*

Wrong. This is Texas law, but every state in the country has this law in their penal code.

Texas Penal Code Sec. 38.171. FAILURE TO REPORT FELONY

Sec. 38.171. FAILURE TO REPORT FELONY. (a) A person commits an offense if the person:

(1) observes the commission of a felony under circumstances in which a reasonable person would believe that an offense had been committed in which serious bodily injury or death may have resulted; and

(2) fails to immediately report the commission of the offense to a peace officer or law enforcement agency under circumstances in which:

(A) a reasonable person would believe that the commission of the offense had not been reported; and

(B) the person could immediately report the commission of the offense without placing himself or herself in danger of suffering serious bodily injury or death.

(b) An offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

It used to be a felony class one class lower than the felony committed, and if a state jail felony, it was a misdemeanor. This is a recent change.

[ - ] UncleDoug -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:25:24 ago (+0/-2)

Have you contacted the police about this?

The site is hosted in the USA, I don't live in the USA.

Everyone defending CP previously posted on this site should eat a fucking bullet, failure to do so makes you a paedo sympathiser.

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:33:59 ago (+2/-1)

My guess is, is that you're conflating drawings with cp. However, the girl in this drawings don't look it, but she's 76 years old.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:47:39 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:40:04 ago (+0/-1)

My guess is, is that you're conflating drawings with cp.

Don't guess and listen carefully, very carefully. On two occasions actual CP, pictures of prepubescent girls were psoted and later deleted to tlol.

One was a minor with her hands up naked (some several months ago) the other standing at a 45degree angle full vag and breast shot (about 1 week ago), both probably 14. They were not Ryden cartoons, they were pictures of naked little girls you disgusting POS.

Are you also a paedo?

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:46:19 ago (+1/-0)

So, that should be reported and the poster should get banned.

I do not support posting of actual underaged girls and agree with the that the person who would willingly spread such materials should face a firing squad.

That being said, I never saw the picture that you're referring to, so fuck off n with trying to make me out to be a pedo.

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:50:11 ago (+0/-1)

I do not support posting of actual underaged girls

That's not been the consensus lately these last 24hrs, as most users are in favour of such content or willfully deny it existed, downplay it or call defenders of children the outrage squad.

That being said, I never saw the picture that you're referring to

I and others unfortunately did notice it, so stop defending the content if you are ignorant to it.

It really is unacceptable and if you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem, so fuck off.

Continue thread

[ + ] HeyJames

[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:48:20 ago (+4/-2)

There is far worse posted to reddit daily than both Joe and Blumen have ever posted. Hell, violentacrez posted MUCH WORSE stuff than either one of them back in the day and the most they could do was doxx and humiliate him. Your argument isn't a real good one and there is no actual CP being posted besides that link on SVF (which is not this website).

[ + ] s23erdctfvyg

[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:51:27 ago (+3/-1)

Well, if you want to see that shit, you can always go to reddit.

[ + ] HeyJames

[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 08:37:22 ago (+2/-1)

That's not the point. His argument is that if you visit a site that has "pedophile content",you are guilty by association.

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:47:04 ago (+4/-4)

Being not worse than Reddit is not a metric for success.

There was actual CP posted, actual pictures of an actual girl, not a cartoon.

I suspected you are paedo too, who else would go to bat this hard for enabling this behaviour. Most users just play devils advocate, but not you.

[ + ] HeyJames

[ - ] HeyJames 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 08:35:22 ago (+5/-3)

I suspected you are paedo too, who else would go to bat this hard for enabling this behaviour. Most users just play devils advocate, but not you.

Now you're just being a fucking idiot. Look at what you're enabling @system. They're not going to give this up.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:36:43 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 17:30:06 ago (+0/-0)

How about on old voat. Original original voat had a whole jailbait sub.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:48:34 ago (+1/-1)

If youre anti abortion youre pro nigger

[ + ] letsgetit

[ - ] letsgetit 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 13:36:48 ago (+0/-0)

Southern Red States still need abortion for niggers and spics. The abortion issue is a win / loss situation depending on the state

[ - ] sguevar 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:54:28 ago (+1/-0)

George?

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:26:40 ago (+5/-0)

Unfortunately, this won't end the argument.

[ - ] x0x7 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 09:41:01 ago (+2/-0)

Of course not. Drama on these sites is a game for them. You can resolve an argument and it will magically go unresolved.

[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:28:16 ago (+4/-3)

Fortunately this isn't reddit

Crying harder doesnt magically make things go away that hurt your fee fees

[ + ] TheViciousMrPim

[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:34:45 ago (+4/-0)

I'm not crying about it in any way. Kinda sick of the drama. Although I confess I read the damn threads.

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:36:48 ago (+2/-0)

I wasn't implying you were

Stop taking shit so personal

[ - ] sguevar 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:32:10 ago (+2/-1)*

Why did you become TheVicious? What happened with MsPrim? O.O... connecting dots... 3... 2... 1... where did you bury* her?

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:36:56 ago (+0/-0)

You misspelled berry

[ - ] sguevar 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:39:19 ago (+3/-0)

Ty for the correction faggot

[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:49:13 ago (+1/-0)

Np nigger

[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 20:13:55 ago (+0/-0)

I think he meant those crying aren't going to learn that crying isn't productive, but nothing will be changed simply because of it meaning the crying will be eternal.

I think he was agreeing with you.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 22:08:30 ago (+0/-0)

Whatever

[ - ] sguevar 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:40:31 ago (+3/-0)

Sometimes you and I find common ground... even as they are rare occasions, it draws a smile on my face.

But you are still a faggot.

[ - ] diggernicks 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:41:50 ago (+5/-0)

Thanks

Coming from someone severely mentally disabled that means alot to me

[ - ] sguevar 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:42:58 ago (+2/-0)

LOL... have a good one.

[ - ] Clubberlang 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:42:20 ago (+0/-0)

Raaaah raaaaaah reeeeeeeeeeee rah reeeeeeeeeeee!

[ - ] FlatPlaneReality -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:34:42 ago (+3/-4)

Yet here you are, crying like a bitch.

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:36:10 ago (+3/-1)

You still upset little lady?

[ - ] FlatPlaneReality -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:40:28 ago (+2/-4)

Im feeling chill, how about you ma'am?

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:43:12 ago (+3/-0)

Kek

[ - ] FlatPlaneReality -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:46:17 ago (+1/-3)

Its okay, im sure NASA will give you some more space pics for you to soyjoy over. That should cheer you up until nap time.

[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:51:06 ago (+1/-0)

Jokes on you

Nap time is 24/7

[ - ] FlatPlaneReality -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:55:43 ago (+0/-1)

Well im sick of having these new accounts downvoted for no reason. Time for me to pull a dangus too.

[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:56:10 ago (+1/-0)

Good luck!

Continue thread

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:39:31 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] sguevar -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:11:09 ago (+0/-1)

The argument will never end. There will always be degenerates pushing boundaries... Clear lines, do place them on check.

[ - ] Anus_Expander 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 08:20:08 ago (+3/-0)

I just want Khazar milkers

[ - ] UncleDoug 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:31:12 ago (+9/-5)*

Some things shouldn't be allowed, cp, calls to terrorism, murder, bestiality and incest.

By allowing CP every user here is at risk, simply by association.

Where is the hide paedo content button? Full frontal nudes of underage girls should be tagged as such, we don't want to see it.

[ - ] sguevar 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:49:26 ago (+4/-0)

By allowing CP

CP is illegal, what are you talking about?

Where is the hide paedo content button? Full frontal nudes of underage girls should be tagged as such, we don't want to see it.

Your proposition does not solve the problem of the drama here, loli faggots are legal... clear and real life CP is not. What type of comparison are you making here?

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:08:22 ago (+2/-2)

Your proposition does not solve the problem of the drama here, loli faggots are legal... clear and real life CP is not.

I'm not talking about those creepy Mark Ryden cartoons that are borderline. b4p posted what looked like an actual 14-15year old girl full frontal nudity that was active for hours before being deleted as a gloat.

The more you know I guess, but by all means continue to carry on as you were, because I saw it with my own eyes and it should not have been allowed.

Also who is the coward that downvoted me? Low T kikes that won't even show their face. Who can seriously advocate for CP, murder, bestiality, and incest? These aren't values in a high trust, White homogenous society.

[ - ] sguevar 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:22:13 ago (+4/-1)

I honestly did not see anything of that sort, I don't know what post you are talking about and if in fact b4p posted something of that sort, it would definitely be cause for banning in my view.

Now, and keep in mind that I hate being the devil's advocate, but as I did not see the photo nor know the model's name and age... I keep in mind the following: not all women have the same size of breasts, not all women have fall into the height percentile they should be at their age, and some people look younger than their age should be according to their birth certificate.

Once again, I am not trying to justify the degenerate's behavior, but I can't also justify further action on him without further investigation.

I am a firm believer in due process, even though it has been used by degenerates at their convenience all the time. For crying out loud I was present during the Voat/Srazi scandal... Screaming out loud for righteous indignation without due process does not serve your cause...

There are both sides of the story to consider when making an opinion of the sort specially when it regards such a serious accusation. Unfortunately I can't make a decision without knowing more about it, and I am sure that degenerates will use younger looking women for the same purpose... to trigger chaos... and disrupt the community.

The first question I would make to myself, in your position, despite the serious dislike that I have for porn is, Is that "model" over 18 years old or not? I know it looks like is not, but is she or not?

Can't prove her age? Can't act on it... but can delete the post because it looks younger.

Unfortunately, I have limitations on acting differently and I am not @system... So, I can understand his limitations as well.

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:43:42 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:44:45 ago (+2/-3)

I honestly did not see anything of that sort, I don't know what post you are talking about and if in fact b4p posted something of that sort, it would definitely be cause for banning in my view.

I don't care if you did, I saw it and other users saw it and we shouldn't have.

I keep in mind the following: not all women have the same size of breasts, not all women have fall into the height percentile they should be at their age, and some people look younger than their age should be according to their birth certificate.

It was a child, not a michelle trachtberg, a perpetual 12yr old looking 20yr old. She was pre-pubescent.

For crying out loud I was present during the Voat/Srazi scandal...

CP is illegal, you have to draw the line somewhere.

There are both sides of the story to consider when making an opinion of the sort specially when it regards such a serious accusation.

I saw it with my own eyes you fuckwit, its not an opinion. I didn't give a shit about the drama and the loli ryden creeper pics until I saw actual CP posted and it disgusted me.

Users should have archived the post and the pic, but then we'd be up for breach of the rules, saving and/or hosting illegal content and propagating CP. That's a little more serious than a forum banned me, its regarding prison time for being a dirty asshole.

Going forward it needs to be made clear and enforceable that CP is not acceptable, and bans regarding outrage over this type of content need to be reversed forthwith IMO.

[ - ] sguevar 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:57:05 ago (+1/-1)

I don't care if you did, I saw it and other users saw it and we shouldn't have.

if it was, I agree.

CP is illegal, you have to draw the line somewhere.

I fully agree.

I saw it with my own eyes you fuckwit, its not an opinion. I didn't give a shit about the drama and the loli ryden creeper pics until I saw actual CP posted and it disgusted me.

I get it, I didn't so I can't address that. I simply gave you a possible argument that I could take without seeing it.

It was a child, not a michelle trachtberg, a perpetual 12yr old looking 20yr old. She was pre-pubescent.

if it was I agree.

Users should have archived the post and the pic, but then we'd be up for breach of the rules, saving and/or hosting illegal content and propagating CP. That's a little more serious than a forum banned me, its regarding prison time for being a dirty asshole.

No need for it, The site admin should have a record of such behavior and post ever done on his site. Again, I don't know what post you are referring to but if it matches with all boundaries that you and I agree with, then I have no disagreement nor devil's advocate comment about it. I just simply do not know.

Going forward it needs to be made clear and enforceable that CP is not acceptable, and bans regarding outrage over this type of content need to be reversed forthwith IMO.

I also agree with this. The site rules should be affected by the laws of the country where the server is located on. If it was a sandnigger goatfucking public pooper location I would be like "shit we are screwed"... after all they are all pedo enablers over there. But at the moment I have hope it is not.

Will @system address this ever, as I have not seen any address of the matter, I don' know... I have my limitations and I know so does he, and what is beyond the point... as I only mostly lurk, I can't say, I saw it because I don't often lurk.

[ - ] chrimony 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:18:59 ago (+7/-0)

I have not seen any address of the matter

This topic goes back a long time. blumen posted a link in a comment to a bunch of nude girls with their arms raised to the ceiling. Some of these girls were clearly underage (think 14-16), and even blumen acknowledges this.

The comment was deleted by cynabuns when she was a mod here. blumen was not banned, but a new site rule was put in place: "Any content with nude and/or sexually explicit images of minors is strictly prohibited and will result in an instant ban."

A vocal group calls that image "child porn". blumen maintains it was "legal" because it was not "sexual". Personally, I don't think it falls under the umbrella of what we think of when we talk about child porn, but I also think, strictly speaking, that it was not legal and clearly of a sexual nature (just like a girl texting a nude photo of herself is sexual).

Regardless of what you think, if blumen were to post that pic today, he would be banned. But a vocal minority carry a never-ending crusade about "pedophilia" being allowed on the site.

[ - ] system [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:24:11 ago (+3/-0)

Wow, someone knows what actually happened?? I am impressed! https://www.voat.xyz/viewpost.php?postid=62f1b64ccc38b&commentid=62f1ef33e36ac

[ + ] SilentByAssociation

[ - ] chrimony 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:28:45 ago (+1/-0)

I am one of your fiercest critics when I think you go off the rails, but I am an honest critic.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:44:40 ago (+0/-0)

You're a solid user. Thanks for the explanation.

I want to say I vaguely remember that, but I'm glad I don't.

[ - ] sguevar 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:35:36 ago (+1/-0)

Thank you for letting me know further about the matter.

The comment was deleted by cynabuns when she was a mod here.

I miss her being a mod to be honest.

blumen was not banned, but a new site rule was put in place: "Any content with nude and/or sexually explicit images of minors is strictly prohibited and will result in an instant ban."

Ok, sad to see that after that scenario, further clarification of the legal matter had to be put in place. Whether the picture had or not sexual intent, the distribution of minors nudity is considered child porn. Which is why no pictures of babies online contain private parts.

b4p's stance is highly concerning mostly because it tries to fall into a loophole that really does not exist. But maybe a US lawyer that has some expertise in criminal law can give more insight on the topic, as my basis are only parting from a common sense ground.

Regardless of what you think, if blumen were to post that pic today, he would be banned. But a vocal minority carry a never-ending crusade about "pedophilia" being allowed on the site.

If there was proof of what he posted and shared with the site admin so he could retroactively apply the rule to the user, then I would support the banning. If there is no proof... then unfortunately, we have to suffer his perseverance to troll the community.

But as the rules are clear and even more clear checks were put in place by the admin, only time will tell if they will suffice.

Prob here is that none here archived the post because of obvious legal concerns. And I take that the user deleted the post shortly after just to trigger a few that will eventually give him more attention.

Just a guess... but again, I have my limitations on the assertions I am giving and I am sure the site owner as well.

There is a fine line between witnessing and hearsay as I understand the two terms... I believe Aged used to do the same thing on Voat and even started spamming other subverses with loli "game art" on the gaming subverse which generated a whole new debate on whether game art was part of gaming... I stand that it does not but, most of the community decided that it was, and that was it for me... majority spoke. Nothing else to do about that...

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:55:23 ago (+0/-0)

Prob here is that none here archived the post because of obvious legal concerns. And I take that the user deleted the post shortly after just to trigger a few that will eventually give him more attention.

I think you can still find an archive of that photo -- though for obvious reasons I'm not going to dig it up. I only saw it myself because after I questioned what actually happened, blumen messaged me personally with a searchvoat link that had an archive of the comment with the link.

You see, blumen still maintains his innocence that the pic was legal and not sexual. Not only that, he chose to wallow in the stink of pedophilia by posting a bunch of creepy paintings of naked, prepubescent girls as a taunt to his detractors.

[ - ] sguevar 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:08:03 ago (+0/-0)*

I think you can still find an archive of that photo -- though for obvious reasons I'm not going to dig it up. I only saw it myself because after I questioned what actually happened, blumen messaged me personally with a searchvoat link that had an archive of the comment with the link. You see, blumen still maintains his innocence that the pic was legal and not sexual. Not only that, he chose to wallow in the stink of pedophilia by posting a bunch of creepy paintings of naked, prepubescent girls as a taunt to his detractors.

It is definitely a hard scenario to deal with. I need to read more about the law that states that only if sexual intent is present then it can be considered illegal.

Either way, rules were put in place and clear lines were drawn... as I said before. So time will tell. Screeching will continue. At this point there is nothing we can do about it...

Defaming the character of users, including the admin, that try to defend freedom of speech according to the laws of the land where the server is placed, just because we don't like it is not wise at all.

Let me give you an example... A few years back I placed a unconstitutionality complaint on the Sala IV of Costa Rica, against the NHS giving the hormone therapy to the degenerates.

Costa Rica NHS is obligatory, even when the older generations like to call it "voluntary", it forces people to pay taxes for it. As a Christian I tried to argue my religious point.

Prob is that here, the spirit of the law is different. The "common good" has a higher consideration than the individual rights. Which is why the covid restrictions that were put here were so easily enacted.

I am a constitutionalist... but I realize that, the Constitution means nothing to the progressives and liberals... And whatever they think is "good" is what stands...

*edit: forgot to add... that it also applies to laws...

[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 04:19:23 ago (+0/-0)

There was an incident only last week, not just 9 months ago when Cynabuns was still a moderator.
This isn't ancient history, it happens frequently and recently.

[ - ] system [op] 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:22:59 ago (+4/-0)

Will @system address this ever, as I have not seen any address of the matter, I don' know... I have my limitations and I know so does he, and what is beyond the point... as I only mostly lurk, I can't say, I saw it because I don't often lurk.

I am not aware of what @UncleDoug is referring to. If bluman deleted it on his own there is no record of it.

However, during the first couple of months after launching the site, the rules were still getting hammered out. The main rule was do not post illegal content. A situation came up where he posted a posted of teens topless with their arms up. The image was removed by Cynabuns before I found out about it. Upon learning the situation we both researched and discussed the topic. Now this might be shocking to you, but nude images of minors is not illegal. It becomes illegal when it becomes sexual. And it doesn't take much at all to cross that line. So we came up with rule 7 "Any content with nude and/or sexually explicit images of minors is strictly prohibited and will result in an instant ban.". This rule includes both nude non-sexual images and non-nude sexual images of minors. This may shock you as well, all those virtue signallers screeching about this place post on a forum which allows nude images of minors. Searchvoat hides it behind a checkbox so in their minds it's all good. It's beyond hypocrisy.

Now you could argue I am a piece of shit for not banning him, but I feel adding a rule and then retroactively applying it is wrong. Had I banned him, there would be people bitching because he technically didn't break the rules.

The problem has been fixed but some people are still unhappy and bitch about it. But I can't change the past, they are who they are, and I refuse to ban someone following the rules set out.

[ - ] sguevar 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:57:40 ago (+1/-0)

The main rule was do not post illegal content.

That should have been enough but as I said on another comment, It is hard to act under a hearsay comment instead of having actual proof. I understand your limitations more than you think.

Now this might be shocking to you, but nude images of minors is not illegal. It becomes illegal when it becomes sexual.

Could you point me to the law where it says that? I need to read it so I can interpret it according to the spirit of the law. I am sure you guys researched with a criminal law lawyer but, at this point when the subject was so fresh, and given the fact that you are hosting a community, a poll should have been opened to balance your position.

Because if legality was the issue, then the consideration of the community's as a whole should have been considered as well. I understand that this comes to a point where it might endanger it to become an eco-chamber but then again, i don't see a healthier path... I need to know further. I am not fluent in US law, I barely handle myself on Costa Rica's laws and believe me... is a fucking pain in the ass... I can only imagine on you guys' side.

Please point me on the law or documentation that addresses this.

Now you could argue I am a piece of shit for not banning him, but I feel adding a rule and then retroactively applying it is wrong. Had I banned him, there would be people bitching because he technically didn't break the rules.

Nah, that determination is yours to make as the site admin. Question you should make yourself is...because no matter the choice you take, there will always be screeching... you can't please everybody... "which choice will keep sanity in the community as a whole?"

If after making that question, you are contempt - happy would be a strong word given the scenario - with the answer you got, then, act accordingly. Despite the screeching on either side. You are hosting a community and hence you need to do what is best for the community in your own eyes as the admin. People will and will not understand, will and will not accept.

Personally, I would have retroactively enacted the rule on the user. But if you are certain that you took the right choice, then we'll agree to disagree and move on. Rules were put in place, clear lines were drawn, if the user tries this again, then fuck him.

He already has stated that he knows how to play the game, using different IPs through VPNs and devices. Which begs to question once again whether your stance was the correct one as he shows no remorse nor has paid for what he has done.

Either way, he will eventually meet his judge, and he will have to answer for his actions... as we all do.

The problem has been fixed but some people are still unhappy and bitch about it. But I can't change the past, they are who they are, and I refuse to ban someone following the rules set out.

Try seeing the site you host as a state, or country. You are a public servant . People comes to your site because of what the site stands for. If the choices you take are to keep a healthier community, you have nothing to regret. If your service is for the community, even when some don't like it... well tough on them, they can choose to leave it or stay to see the fruits of what was sowed.

Sadly, but wisely, only time will tell.

You've made your choice and acted accordingly. Screenching will keep on going. Read it, do not let it drag you down. Words can become curses to those that said them... become their own punishments, do not let the words and curses of others become your punishment. That is my advise.

[ - ] sguevar 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:42:52 ago (+1/-0)

I still need to read more about it but,

"lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;"

Wasn't there a lascivious intent from the publisher?

Doesn't this enters the category of CP and hence illegal content which would in fact validate the banning of the user who made such post according to the initial rule?

Or am I understanding incorrectly what the law describes there?

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 04:26:00 ago (+0/-1)

"lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;"

Posting a full frontal vaginal shot of a tween is obviously an infraction of this "golden" rule.

@PostWallHelena do you want to take time of defending fkH kikes to defend B4P paedos for 5min?
What is a female simp called? Simpette or just old barren woman?

[ - ] chrimony 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 06:24:54 ago (+0/-0)

I am not aware of what @UncleDoug is referring to. If bluman deleted it on his own there is no record of it.

If blumen is in the habit of posting the URL and then deleting it, then it seems you should have a flag in the code that keeps a record of what blumen deletes. PostWallHelena isn't known to be a liar:

"This happened like a week ago. He was linking to a post he made months ago on search voat forum which had a picture of topless girls that appeared to be under 18. These girls seemed to be 15 or 16. He didnt directly link to it from here, but he posted images of the url of the post. And then he was daring people to link to it. I don’t know the legality of it. But I didn’t fucking like it."

https://www.talk.lol/viewpost?postid=62e4428b90d08&commentid=62e45b8fbcf89

[ + ] yesiknow

[ - ] yesiknow -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:35:14 ago (+1/-2)

Don't be slimy. Pictures and drawings of children can easily and deliberately insinuate chid porn. It's just passive aggressive. Oh it doesn't cross any lines, so you have to have 10,000 insinuations of sex and children without ever crossing that arbitrary line.

A pig is a pig, no matter how it's dressed.

[ - ] sguevar 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:36:47 ago (+2/-0)

Reading more about US law on the matter.

[ + ] yesiknow

[ - ] yesiknow 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 05:28:35 ago (+2/-0)

Who gives a shit about us law on the matter. This s a forum, not a country Do you check what the law says when you interact with people over dinner?

[ - ] sguevar 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 09:10:37 ago (+3/-0)

You are making a wrong analogy here, CP is not speech.

Laws matter whether you like it or not.

Trying to find out about the intent loophole so I can understand better.

[ + ] yesiknow

[ - ] yesiknow 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 22:04:23 ago (+0/-0)

You're behaving like a programmed robot.

The law can only prosecute what is specifically illegal. You think every single internet site has to operate to allow every single thing that isn't specifically illegal.

No personal discretion, no personal decisions and no thought allowed. You have no power to make everyone on earth a duplicate of yourself and your way of not thinking.

[ - ] Rob3122 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:34:59 ago (+5/-1)

Any update on Dangus potentially being unbanned?

[ - ] system [op] 8 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:06:41 ago (+9/-1)

If he reaches out to me most likely we could work something out.

[ + ] Rob3122

[ - ] Rob3122 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:39:08 ago (+5/-0)

Thanks for considering working something out. Anyone know how to get in touch with Dangus? If anyone does, tell him to reach out to system and to not be a big fat Dangus about it.

Plus now we know system has a heart and isn't a robot after all!

https://files.catbox.moe/162y1z.jpeg

https://invidious.tiekoetter.com/watch?v=DMOM913KSIs

[ - ] Boardallday3 -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:04:16 ago (+6/-7)

I saw the he was banned because this system faggot was mad.

System doesn't like anti-pedophiles

[ - ] RMGoetbbels 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 04:58:33 ago (+4/-1)

What the fuck you stupid whiny little motherfuckers...........jesus christ. FUCK. Fucking snowflakes. How do you pansy shits get through your day?

You can just NOT look at it. QUIT MAKING PROBLEMS.

[ - ] BrokenVoat 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 03:03:51 ago (+3/-0)

What is point of this? What is called adult is absurd at any rate, showing female nipples in 70s movies was ok but is now pornography not allowed in mature youtube content.

[ - ] RobertJHarsh 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:15:31 ago (+2/-0)

I don't think I have ever seen T&A on this site.

[ - ] Wahaha 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:25:21 ago (+2/-0)

Why not opt-out? How are you supposed to know you can opt-in as a normal user casually browsing?

[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:33:45 ago (+3/-0)

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:37:58 ago (+4/-2)

Q predicted this

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:39:19 ago (+0/-0)

Goddamn, diggernicks, sometimes you is a funny guy.

Reply not required.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 09:04:24 ago (+0/-0)

2 more weeks

Promise

[ - ] system [op] 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:59:03 ago (+2/-0)

I watched and listened to the video. While I could understand and appreciate some of what it had to say, a lot of it went over my head. I understand what it's conveying but the message is not getting through. I'll take a "For Dummies" version if available.

[ - ] diggernicks -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:42:08 ago (+1/-3)

You know seneca was a boy lover right?

[ - ] Fascinus 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:26:10 ago (+2/-0)

Evidence of ancient Roman pederasty or GTFO.

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:28:05 ago (+1/-1)

Don't get mad over shit that implodes your narrow lil worldview

Thats acting like a democrat

[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:31:49 ago (+3/-0)

Not mad at all, nor do I have a narrow worldview.

I'm not attached to any outcome here. Truth is truth.

Speaking of which, upon what basis do you assert pederasty?

[ - ] MaryXmas 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:36:23 ago (+0/-0)

Fact is fact. Truth is an interpretation of presented facts that may or may not be correct.

[ - ] SocksOnCats 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:29:05 ago (+3/-0)

Wow! Thank you!

I like porn, but only when I want it (which is fairly infrequently) and I don’t want to see porn here as it distracts terribly.

This is a great move. Thank you again.

[ - ] Her0n 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:21:41 ago (+6/-3)

Is there an "opt out" option for pedophilic posts?

[ - ] sguevar 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:13:52 ago (+4/-1)

One thing we can all be sure of, wherever there is drama and site admin publication, @diggernicks will thrive with his trolling machine... fucking faggot, stop making me laugh.

[ - ] paul_neri 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:41:16 ago (+3/-0)

He's not bad though. Enjoys the challenge of making pithy if not witty retorts.

[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:20:04 ago (+1/-1)

"he's not bad though"

Oh look, a kike telling you another kike "isn't bad" who constantly gaslights and dehumanizes people, yea kikes like paul and digger need to be deported from our countries and all access to the internet revoked

Free speech isn't a human right to kikes, it's a weapon, one that should be removed from their possession

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 15:40:40 ago (+0/-0)

Post address

[ + ] lord_nougat

[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 15:44:22 ago (+0/-0)

and bobs

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 15:45:36 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] Boardallday3 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:59:59 ago (+10/-7)

Why don't you ban Blumen4alles he's an unashamed outspoken pedophile. What kind of faggot website is this? I do like this little website other than him getting a pass posting that shit and admitting he wants to rape underage girls many times.

Why do you allow it?

[ - ] VicariousJambi 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:15:05 ago (+6/-4)

because muh free speech!!! let’s allow pedophiles to groom children, it’s their right because muh free speech!!!

[ - ] MaryXmas 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:32:17 ago (+4/-2)

Exactly. Free speech isn't cheap. Block him or report him, end of convo.

[ - ] VicariousJambi 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:03:10 ago (+5/-4)

If you block him you’re just allowing him to continue his behavior. Reporting him obviously doesn’t matter as the admin is outright allowing it now

https://files.catbox.moe/slkst5.png

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:38:06 ago (+5/-2)

[ - ] MaryXmas 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 06:51:14 ago (+2/-1)

And it is his right to do so. Why would you be so arrogant that you could control the actions of another? You get to decide what is best for you, you don't get to decide what is best for me. As long as actions are within legal requirements, anything goes.

[ - ] VicariousJambi -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 08:38:12 ago (+1/-3)

oy vey goyim as long as its legal that means its ok!!

I guess you're all for pedophiles grooming children.

People are allowed to make a gated community and regulate who is in it or not. What you're basically arguing for is the jewish melting pot idea. Fuck allowing a people to have their own country, fuck ethnostates, that racist, just let anyone in, its legal!!1!11!!!!

[ - ] MaryXmas -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:34:01 ago (+0/-1)

Yep. As long as it is legal, it's ok. I don't agree with a porn or grooming and I can work to enforce and change the laws off platform. Outside of that, it would be disrespectful to enforce my beliefs on someone else.
You are sounding just like a lefty faggot. Crying "but I don't like him" is a purely emotional response.

[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:22:32 ago (+0/-0)

Outside of that, it would be disrespectful to enforce my beliefs on someone else.

Fuck off kike, seriously no one cares about your faggoty chutzpah arguments and gaslighting

You kikes are not allowed in White society anymore, rejected and revoked, crimes against humanity...all kikes go in the fire

[ - ] sguevar 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:38:01 ago (+2/-0)

Ah but when your "Christian" beliefs get persecuted you will shout "muh free speech"...

Before you go there, the words you decide to answer to this or not, I leave them between you and God.

[ - ] VicariousJambi 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:02:13 ago (+1/-1)

i’m not a christian, faggot, nice try.

[ - ] sguevar 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:05:05 ago (+1/-1)

Refer to my previous comment.

[ - ] MaryXmas 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 06:52:23 ago (+1/-1)

Yeah, you argue like a jew.

[ - ] diggernicks -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:39:22 ago (+0/-2)

Raptor jesus fuck youre just naturally brainwashed and retarded?

[ - ] Clubberlang 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:41:32 ago (+3/-0)

Thank you I get triggered so easily!

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 17:33:48 ago (+2/-1)

deleted

[ - ] UncleDoug -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 23:32:42 ago (+0/-1)

Prove your lies are true, I will carve your name into a bullet and use it to blow my head off.

I should have archived the questionable content before you deleted the post.

Threats of violence are also against the TOS.

[ - ] ForgottenMemes 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:06:16 ago (+2/-0)

Thanks fag.

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:43:53 ago (+2/-0)

Fuck yeah. Hey, while we're at it can we get a tag on the profile for people that opt in?

I'm kidding. Kind of. No really, it's a joke. Lol.

Seriously though, can you do that?

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:53:52 ago (+0/-0)

More e stalking?

Try getting a hobby

[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:06:14 ago (+2/-0)

Lol ok. Wanna compare hobbies? Vidya and going to beat street aren't hobbies, just for clarification, those are just addictions.

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:15:55 ago (+2/-0)

Yeah

I dont care what internet strangers do or do not do

Its gay to care

[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry

[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:32:33 ago (+0/-0)

Ok, nevermind then if you don't give a rusty fuck.

[ + ] NationalSocialism

[ - ] paul_neri 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:37:22 ago (+0/-0)

I opted in. I check out Joe's stuff but lose interest once the girls have disrobed. I'm an artist you know. I just wish Joe or someone else would post a few more boob pics.

[ - ] calx 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:29:55 ago (+2/-0)

You gall durn perverts!

shakes fist

[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 12:55:45 ago (+1/-0)

so Hunter Biden leaks will be hidden? c'mon man. it should be the other way around, the option given to hide it, not have it automatically hidden and thus frustrate and censor people who aren't actually posting porn but are posting things they think are important like Hunter's leaks.

[ - ] NationalSocialism 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 19:28:29 ago (+1/-0)

I agree it should be opt-in, not censored by default.

The kvetching for censorship on this site is so jewish. I find it funny that it primarily comes from the judaism-lite users.

[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:07:49 ago (+2/-0)

Lame.

[ - ] texasblood 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:47:34 ago (+3/-1)

Help the porn addicts
Always a prime culture move for fucking idiots with keyboards

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:54:58 ago (+5/-2)

Help more illegal alien invaders settle in your back yard

[ - ] sguevar 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:12:37 ago (+3/-1)

this cracked me up lmao

[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:43:42 ago (+2/-0)

Went there, but became confused as to whether it shows that is or that is enabled or disabled, or whether we hit ENABLE to disable and DISABLE to enable, so left before locking myself out, again.

[ + ] PrincessRobotBubblegum

[ - ] system [op] 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:47:19 ago (+4/-1)

I'll fix that now.

[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:17:09 ago (+1/-0)

UwU

It’s important to specify nudity as pornography, since liberals believe the possibility that pornography may be art entails that it should not be censored; while we all know that depictions of nude people are a violation of Muhammedian Law, that art is pornographic blasphemy, and that women do not really exist as a biological reality.

Either Muhammad Van Winklestein or the lowest common denominator between the Feminazis, the Fundies, the Taliban & the local rabbi won out, and proved my point precisely.

Fig the First Amendment! We’re all property of Obama! Don’t forget to wear a mask, especially ladies, until Obama’s headgear decrees go into effect!

And don’t forget to bring a towel!

[ + ] PrincessRobotBubblegum

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:19:38 ago (+2/-0)

Stop hitting refresh

[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:16:26 ago (+2/-2)

[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 18:37:47 ago (+1/-0)

So, the statue of David is porn? A parent taking a picture of their child playing in the bathtub is porn?

Pretty sure it's not.

[ - ] deleted -5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:06:29 ago (+2/-7)

deleted

[ - ] system [op] 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:08:53 ago (+6/-0)

I'll give you a chance to delete your account.

[ + ] bonghits4jeebus

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:15:10 ago (+2/-0)

You said that yesterday, too. "Well, bye"

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:12:52 ago (+1/-0)

You've had a rush of blood to the head.Go for a bike ride.

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:02:51 ago (+1/-1)

Nobody cares. Please let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 10, 2022 02:50:41 ago (+0/-0)

One hopes this to be the last time it's necessary, as I vaguely recall doing this before. And how are subs blocked? I might want to do this for them I avoid commenting in.

[ - ] boekanier 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:16:12 ago (+1/-0)

good, just good. I thought of 'joe mcarthy' the vicious porn dealer here.

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 10:47:12 ago (+0/-0)

Thanks for putting this in place. It gives us another opportunity for self-ownership and -regulation.

[ - ] observation1 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:54:42 ago (+2/-2)

Friendly reminder that diggernicks is a pedo

https://searchvoat.co/v/AskVoat/2361540/11745278

https://files.catbox.moe/0n1bwx.jpeg

Several users even ask him directly and he never denies it. Much like Joe who doesn't deny being attracted to and advocating for porn with minors.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 00:40:22 ago (+2/-2)

deleted

[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 01:33:19 ago (+2/-0)

I upvoted you. What to you is spam is legit content, imo, that is sometimes serious and sometimes whimsical. I like to think my stuff adds variety to the site and judging from the number of upvotes and comments I get, most folk here seem to agree.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:28:55 ago (+3/-2)

deleted

[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 02:41:40 ago (+1/-0)

Thanks bro.

[ - ] AryanPrime -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 9, 2022 11:25:42 ago (+0/-2)

shhh...paul is the resident kike who pretends to be everyone's friend, so regardless of the fact he is in here constantly gaslighting people, the kike System allows it to continue

This is why kikes love the phrase "free speech"...it's just another tool to them to wage war against Caucasians

So you know...stop taking anything a kike run account says in good faith

Paul neri, diggernicks,natsoc,joemcarthy,blumen, and of course System the accounts that spend hours and hours posting on here like they are getting paid to...well they are, kikes pay other kikes to come online and kike the discussion

AOU from Poal let his IP slip one day and it was shown to be from israel actual

Also take notice of the "just make your own"

We tried that, Whites made america for WHite people...even when we make our own other people want in, access to White society for non WHites should be illegal

[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:03:33 ago (+2/-2)

deleted

[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:04:51 ago (+3/-2)

Arent I beaming like a proud papa!

[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:08:38 ago (+2/-0)

deleted

[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:09:42 ago (+2/-1)

The sun is cool

It reminds me of a white hot furnace

[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:23:31 ago (+6/-7)

Super faggotry.

Stop catering to crybaby christ cucks who bawwww oceans of bitch tears and have non stop tantrums over things they don't like.

https://files.catbox.moe/78azzk.mp4

[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:39:31 ago (+3/-0)

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:40:14 ago (+3/-0)

16 minutes?

Lolno

[ - ] Fascinus 8 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:42:43 ago (+8/-0)

Bet if it was 16 minutes of porn, you'd watch it :)

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:44:18 ago (+3/-1)

You dont know me very well

Make your point quickly and succinctly

[ - ] Fascinus 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:46:50 ago (+5/-0)

Maybe if I watched porn I'd be able to offer a more speedy delivery :)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=wzWbsrCeULg

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:49:11 ago (+2/-0)

[ - ] Fascinus 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:59:08 ago (+2/-0)

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:44:38 ago (+4/-3)

Your mouths full of catholic priest dick again.

Your mumbling.

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 21:45:18 ago (+4/-2)

My fan club is here

[ - ] paul_neri 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 22:57:56 ago (+3/-0)

and I am your No.1 fan diggernicks so please hear out my suggestion - that you, yes you, create a Goat Drama subtalk 'cos I like goat drama and would use it a lot - well all the time actually. If I created the subtalk no-one would use it. Yes it is sad but that's life.

[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:00:10 ago (+4/-1)

I am genuinely mentally disturbed by this statement.

I may just go have a drink for the first time in years to burn this memory from my mind.

[ - ] paul_neri 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:01:12 ago (+2/-0)

Hurtful, damn hurtful.

[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 8, 2022 23:02:33 ago (+0/-1)

Sorry, the internet is not a nice place.