Sign into an existing account

deleted

deleted

Is that why kikes made it into one of their sacraments to rape little babies?

I disagree with both the biological and environmental models proposed for homosexuality.

I go with both as my answer, the grooming will only work on certain children, those who are biologically susceptible to it, however the things that increase this reaction to grooming (of turning gay) are already maximized in our environment, in our food, water, air, everything, a woman's womb is primed to produce potential fags, but they still need that secondary component, otherwise they will simply be the failed male, beta soycucks, but they will be heterosexual nonetheless.

On these sorts of straight men, it's not that they won't inherit a feminized form of behavior, they will be very much like faggots would if faggots were attracted to the opposite sex rather than their own - especially when it comes to sex.
These failed men will act towards females like the fags act towards other males, but their advances won't be reciprocated in turn, instead it will be rejected with disgust from their victims.
Hence the creepiness and sexual perversity of male feminists towards women and girls (by which I mean underaged females), the men are obsessed with sex, and will do whatever they can to get it, this means pretending to give a damn about those purple haired tattooed bitches in the problem glasses, and then sexually assaulting them when given the opportunity to do so.

I don't believe you. Reporting facts in a "no one could have seen this coming" manner is something a retard can do, not journalism.