Only a few people here seem to understand that telescopes can not see that far, it is physically impossible. Just because the kikes have fooled you into thinking that "planets" are millions of miles away doesnt make it a fact. In fact, the laws of physics outright disprove this theory.
We are not looking at light reflecting from solid objects at unfathomable distances, the planets are wandering stars, much closer than kike propaganda suggests.
What kind of faggot starts his post insulting people, making a claim and saying the laws of physics prove them, then refuses to prove a word of it but goes in to the comments calling anyone that disagrees a butt hurt cunt?? Lol Like Jesus fucking Christ you autistic screech. Just calm the fuck down and prove your claims and have a convo if you actually care about the topic at all.
the planets are wandering stars, much closer than kike propaganda suggests.
Prove it. Prove their distance from us, and prove they’re just wondering.
Repeating shit from your rockerfeller funded textbooks I see. How far and fast do photons travel. Can you replicate the science experiment to showcase these claims or do you believe in them based on faith.
These "claims" have been replicated fool. They are replicated all the fucking time in literally dozens of ways. In the nuclear fission field. In the study of the sun. In basic astronomy. What the fuck, dude?
There. I tried to help. Some retarded people don't get it. Should I explain what the word "YOU" means or do you need a dictionary approved by the jews?
Then go ahead and source the information and replicate the experiments. You wont, you believe in this shit based on faith and the only reason you know about it is because of kike propaganda.
If planets were "wandering stars" then why does the planet we live on have a dark side?
Because the sun is closer. Literally the same reason they wouldn't illuminate the earth like the moon does. The claim isn't that all stars are the same distance as the sun. The claim is that they are not as far away as jew academia claims.
You cunts get awfully defensive over kike propaganda being attacked. Go ahead and point out how I am incorrect. Go ahead and prove that planets are real without relying on kike propaganda.
So you believe in space and planets but cant even provide one single proof. The burdon of proof is not on me. I dont claim that planets are real. I cant prove something doesnt exist, you must prove it does. Since you cant, you believe in it based on faith in kike propaganda.
Just as I thought. You just make shit up as you go because you're a faggot redditor that's trying to get screencaps to post on his gay ass twitch channel. Fucking loser.
Logical fallacy - asking people to prove a negative and suggesting that the lack of the ability to do so, somehow, adds credibility to your claims. It doesn't.
The people asking to prove a negative are those asking me for proof. The only "proof" of planets comes from kike media and kike academia. The same intstitutions that promote gender theory, climate change, white guilt e.t.c.
I never said stars are meandering planets. I dont fucking believe in the kike myth of planets. So straight of the bat you showcase your lack of reading comprehension.
2nd of all, the only proof you can provide of said planets is ONLY through a medium of kike propaganda. When we look through our own telescopes, we dont see physical obects akin to what kike media shows us, we aee balls of energy and light. Until you can give me a repeatable scientific experiment to prove otherwise. I dont suggest the earth is flat, all the evidence points to the Earth being completely flat. Ive posted countless threads on these facts in which dissengenious cunts like yourself use pilpul like a kike to dismiss.
I dont suggest the earth is flat, all the evidence points to the Earth being completely flat.
Yes you have, and no it doesn't. You ignore the facts that point to a round earth and you pick and choose which round earth facts to argue. There is plenty of evidence of a round earth and nothing to suggest the earth is flat.
You have never posted anything that suggests the earth is flat and only tried to suggest that the earth is flat by trying to dispell arguments about the earth being round.
Do you know what a star looks like through the most powerful telescopes we have? A bright dot.
It's the moon that we can see detail in. Planets are just colored dots through a telescope. We can see the sun's aurora detail through filters and blocking the sun's light.
And, there is provable science and the mafs that show how its possible for a telescope to see detail on the moon.
It's a sun. Our sun is a star, too. And to look at is detail, ie the aurora, we must put in a filter that blocks the immense light and then use other filters to highlight the aurora. I have little doubt that, in the near vacuum of space, that light could travel billions and billions of miles with ease.
Your just repeating kike propaganda. There is no scientific way to test your claims but you will continue to espouse it as truth. Religiously believing in kike science just as leftards do.
There is no scientific way to measure the distance of a star. That's true. But we can, and have, measured distances to the moon and to planets that have been passed by satellite.
But lemme guess, satellites aren't real and are nothing but jew propaganda, which is an unproven claim that you've made, also.
The fact that all of you retards accept the mainstream narrative of how much curvature we have, yet when we go and perform any curvature experiment in real life there is ZERO curvature to our plane, it is very telling to how lazy and unintelligent you lot really are. You never "learnt" anything in school, you were taught to repeat jewish propaganda and you pat yourselves on the back for breaking out of some of it.
Some planets are visible without a telescope. They were identified thousands of years ago without the aid of later inventions such as lenses and mirrors. With a telescope, vague right spots were identified as other planets because their movement behaved in a similar manner as other planets.
Only a few people here seem to understand that telescopes can not see that far, it is physically impossible.
Galileo's telescope could apparently see the rings around Saturn and its satellites. No one ever doubted this, not even the Catholic church. What got Galileo in trouble with the pope was that he wrote a book ridiculing the pope himself for not automatically ratifying Galileo's entire system of cosmology, which was mostly wrong.
So, dude, planets are NOT wandering stars. And yes, since it's your assertion, the burden of proof is on you to prove it. Until then, I'm going to believe you're a provocateur jew.
So now you claim the human eye can see solid objects at unfathomable distances too.
Galileo's telescope could apparently
Saturn does have visible rings around it, doesnt prove its a solid object nor a planet.
You are making assumptions like every other globetard does.
The burdon of proof is on those that claim the stars are solid objects even though nobody has ever gone to one let alone it would be impossible for light to bounce and reflect of the sun at such distances.
The only proof you fuckheads are basing your worldview of is kike propaganda, printed and pumped out in kike media and academia.
I would suggest the same about you. Not a lick of proof for a flat earth. And no, trying to disprove, or better said, dispelling bad science that supports round earth is not proving flat earth.
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:21:15 ago (+2/-1)
Not a lick of proof for a flat earth.
Lol. The argument is that you only reference jew propaganda. The only way for you to prove the earth is a ball is to reference jew propaganda.
Now on the other hand, there are countless proofs that you could witness for yourself.
Like calm flat water. It shouldn't exist on a ball hurling through space.
The stars should not be in the same place as ancient history stars.
Pilots and bridge engineers should include the curvature in their equations. I know pilots and engineers. They don't.
The horizon should lower significantly when flying in a plane. It's still at eye lever.
But you are a moon fagg. Moon faggs are retarded because they believe we could put a man on the moon in the 60s but we destroyed the technology and it's too difficult to rebuild it in 2022. Now that is a special level of retardation.
Like calm flat water. It shouldn't exist on a ball hurling through space.
This isn't proof of a flat earth. This is an attempt to prove the earth is not round. And is monumentally stupid.
The stars should not be in the same place as ancient history stars.
This is an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
Pilots and bridge engineers should include the curvature in their equations. I know pilots and engineers. They don't.
I'm a pilot and an engineer (not a bridge engineer) and they do, but this is, yet again, an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
The horizon should lower significantly when flying in a plane. It's still at eye lever.
Yet again, this is not proof of a flat earth but an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
But you are a moon fagg. Moon faggs are retarded because they believe we could put a man on the moon in the 60s but we destroyed the technology and it's too difficult to rebuild it in 2022. Now that is a special level of retardation.
This is simply off topic and irrelevant to the argument. Just meant as an ad hominem.
Now, do you have any proof the the earth is flat that doesn't involve trying to suggest that the earth is not round?
I'm betting not.
You mention pilots. Okay. When you fly from NY to London, looking at a flat map planes travel in an arc, and do not take a straight line. They do this because the earth is round and the arc is shorter than the straight line on a Flat map. Does this require faith in kike media to believe? Is it a grand conspiracy among every air carrier on the planet to intentionally waste everyone's time and all that fuel to push a round earth?
No. But it's evidence that supports flat earth and not ball flying through space.
Flat earth 1 Ball 0
Stars should be different from past
This is an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
Yes. Because it's evidence that supports flat stationery earth and not a ball flying through space.
Flat earth 2 Ball 0
I'm a pilot and an engineer (not a bridge engineer) and they do
This would be the perfect opportunity to PROVE me wrong. Why didn't you? Can you not find documented evidence of the thing you says exists? Surely you can provide blueprints Mr. Engineer. So since you can't provide that, this point goes to flat earth.
Flat earth 3 Ball 0
Horizon always at same eye level.
Yet again, this is not proof of a flat earth but an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
Yet again you failed to understand that this is evidence that supports flat earth and not ball.
Flat earth 4 Ball 0
Moon faggot
This is simply off topic and irrelevant to the argument. Just meant as an ad hominem.
Don't care you moon faggot. I won't give a point for this fact but it's a fact nonetheless.
Now, do you have any proof the the earth is flat that doesn't involve trying to suggest that the earth is not round?
I gave you evidence the earth is flat. 4 different instances that can personally be viewed by anyone. I can't dismiss it simply because it proves your ball theory is retarded. Lol. your response was literally "your trying to prove the earth isn't a ball." I mean, what the fuck do you expect if someone is proving it's flat? It's not both retard and you have no argument.
You mention pilots. Okay. When you fly from NY to London
Look up some books about emergency landings and stop being so retarded.
How does flat calm water support flat earth? -1 for making shit up.
Why would stars be different from the past? The stars appear to move as the earth moves the only time a star is in the same position is when the earth is in very near position as before. Again, you're making shit up. Tonight, I will go outside and look at a star and 6 months from now b that star will appear to have moved. The only consistent star that I know of is the north star, but it even has a range of motion.
Blueprints for what? And how does me not providing blueprints prove a flat earth. Just proof you don't understand what words mean.
On the moon. Is it real? Is it round? Is it a projection? Which psycho boat are you in regarding the moon?
None of what you posted here is evidence of a flat earth. Most of what you said isn't even true. The stars appear to move. Relative motion is a real thing. Pilots and engineers use round earth models all the time.
How does flat calm water support flat earth? -1 for making shit up.
Lol. Flat earth is calm and flat. It's exactly how water would react if it were sitting on a stationery calm flat surface.
You think I made that up? How dumb are you?
But you'd have me believe we're on a rock hurling through space. Ok retard.
Why would stars be different from the past?
Because supposedly everything exploded in a "big bang" and everything is constantly moving away from everything. I think that theory is bullshit because the stars are exactly the same like clockwork.
On flat earth, stars are not balls of fire flying through a vacuum. Space is water. Stars are like this.
They have a fixed rotation that works like a clock.
Blueprints for what?
You said you're an engineer that uses the curvature of the earth and your equations. What have you ever engineered that required the curvature?
And how does me not providing blueprints prove a flat earth.
It proves that you're not an engineer and you're claim that you are and have used the curvature in equations when engineering is false.
I can show you blueprints all day that do not use the curvature. I'd give an example but it's literally everything. Can you show me one that does?
Just proof you don't understand what words mean.
You couldn't understand why I asked you to back up a claim. You said you were an engineer that used the curvature in blueprints. I say you're full of shit and asked you to prove it by giving me one example. If you can't do that, it means my claim that it doesn't exist still holds true which would be evidence that the Earth is flat.
See how that works. You don't get to just say you're an engineer and things exist. You have to prove it. Should be easy if what you're saying is true.
On the moon. Is it real? Is it round? Is it a projection? Which psycho boat are you in regarding the moon?
I'm saying you don't know what the moon is and neither do I. You were told what it is. You believe what you were told. I was told what it is. I don't trust those mutherfuckers because they lie about everything. So I will continue saying "I don't know what the moon is." But you better believe I'm going to call you a retard if you believe that we had the technology to send a man to the moon in 1969 yet we destroyed it and it's too difficult to build it in 2022.
None of what you posted here is evidence of a flat earth.
You are truly retard. Flat calm water might not prove the earth is flat and stationery alone. But it is indeed evidence that it is. God you are dumb.
If only they took the time to double check and verify the kike science in the same way they blindly attack flat plane Earth facts.
These people need to relearn the basics, such as how our eyeballs process information and can only see limited distances before everything converges into the horizon. I appreciate you joining in the discussion mate.
That's what I don't get about this place. All day long we can see posts talking about how ridiculous it is to believe the holocaust happened or that 911 was mossad and cia.
It's not hard for people here to agree that the majority of the world is retarded and brainwashed by jewish propaganda and academia but mention how every single "proof" that the earth is a ball is provided by the same exact monster and now it's a ridiculous notion to believe science and academia is corrupted. It's like they believe they can lie about shit like covid, but they'd never lie to you about what's outside our sun's reach.
Zero proof of what? That we cant see distances over millions of miles?
However, in 1941 a vision scientist, Selig Hecht, worked out that, with a clear, unobstructed view, the human eye could see a candle light flickering about 30 miles away.
The human eye can only see certain distances before the horizon converges and compresses into a pixel. This is a fundemental law of physics in which we visualize the plane we live on. We are physically incapable of looking at objects thousands of miles away due to this.
There is no proof that these exist. There are claims and photographa provided by kikes, similarly to holohoax and climate change.
I simply find all of your illogical conclusions to be hillarious.
The other funny thing about all of you cunts is you pick and choose when to assign atmospheric distortion to comfort your views.
You will mock flat earthers by asking why we cant see the beijing fish markets yet on the same hand claim that we can only see planets millions of miles away because of a lack of atmosphere. The mental gymnastics is exactly on par with leftists
The song is the gayest fucking shit on the internet and now I have aids because I listened to 10 seconds of it. Thanks dude. You literally just gave me aids.
Do you feel that this picture of earth in that video shows a flat earth?
If you were on a ball and you raise yourself off that ball, the horizon isn't going to be at your fucking eye level, is it. You cunts seriously piss me off by failing to comprehend such simple logic.
If you were on a ball and you flew up higher then the ball, you would have to look down to see the horizon of the ball. Since we are on an infinite flat plane, the horizon will always remain at eye level, merging everything in the distance into a skydeck horizon.
There are plenty of curvature calculators to work this out. Pick one of any because none of them are pro-flat earth links. We don't believe in curvature, these were created in an attempt to disprove the flat earth yet it does the opposite.
Like I said in chat you drongo, if you are 6ft at sea level you can see approximately 5km to the horizon. If you walk up to a higher elevation, your eye level is your height unchanged plus the elevation above sea level.
So you are at North Stradbroke and reckon you can barely make out a 4x4 30m away, but the highest elevation on straddie is 237m so at the peak elevation you could see some 55km to the horizon you nonce.
Now I understand why you are a concreter by trade.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 06:37:38 ago (+2/-1)
Again, you trying to disprove round earth is not proof of a flat earth. You seem to think that if you pick and choose which things to disprove and ignore the things you can't disprove about round earth, then that proves a flat earth. It doesn't.
If you think the earth is flat, prove it. Stop trying to prove the earth is not round. That's the whole point about but being able to prove a negative. You can't. And no one is expecting you to do it.
Show us a picture of the ISS from your telescope. Its only 227 miles away so you should be able to get me a very clear and precise photograph of it orbiting Earth, right?
In an atmosphere, dummy. A laser light travels at any length in a vacuum. Light can travel in fiber around the planet with almost no energy, like low voltage power.
Space IS 5 miles away, retard. 5-9 miles away. And as you travel higher into the atmosphere the atmosphere gets thinner. You can paint an aircraft to 5000 feet (1 mile) with a toy laser. Nasa used a commercial powered green laser designed to travel huge distance.
How is that brain dead? Do you even know what dissipates (sp?) a laser? Virtually nothing in space will dissipate a laser's beam, or a sun's (or star's) rays, or a planets color.
Lol. Anyone can dip their hand in water. The fact you think that statement is the equivalent of having faith in jewish academia about things you will never have the means to test yourself shows just how brain dead you are.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 07:13:44 ago (+1/-0)
In this exact instance, the OP is suggesting that high powered commercial lasers designed for long travel can't be used to reflect off the moon. But that can be and it seems like common sense that they could.
This doesn't require faith in jewish academia. Am I supposed to buy a high powered commercial laser designed for travel to prove this?
Another example. If you were to travel from the magnetic north pole, due south for 30 miles, turn 90° due east and travel for 30 miles, then turn 90° back due north, you would travel 30 miles back to your original spot.
Now, because I can't physically go to the magnetic north pole, am I relying on jew media and jew academia to know this is true?
There are literally dozens of ways the earth is shown to be round that do not require jewish media or kike academia to be believed. But because I can't physically run the experiment myself, I subject to a kikisms? It's fucking retarded.
Yes it does. Are you buying the Lazer or are you taking it on faith?
Another example. If you were to travel from the magnetic north pole, due south for 30 miles, turn 90° due east and travel for 30 miles, then turn 90° back due north, you would travel 30 miles back to your original spot.
This example doesn't prove anything. The north pole is center on the the flat earth. It would work the same way. I need examples that support your theory and not mine also.
Now, because I can't physically go to the magnetic north pole, am I relying on jew media and jew academia to know this is true?
How are you not?
There are literally dozens of ways the earth is shown to be round that do not require jewish media or kike academia to be believed.
Also you
But because I can't physically run the experiment myself, I subject to a kikisms?
So which is it? Are there dozens I can do myself or can I not physically do them?
The equilateral triangle example - You could perform the same experiment and get the same results on traveling distances from the south pole. Is the south pole also the center of the flat earth?
Jew media and jew academia. What is this? You seem to suggest that it's any information that you can't get yourself. A million dollar science experiment is "jew media" or "jew academia" unless you are able and willing to spend the million dollars and do it yourself. And even if you did spend the b money and do it yourself, it would still be jew media and jew academia for everyone else but you. Is there any information that can be used without the DIY requirement?
Do the experiment or take it on faith. Is that the only two options? If a hand held toy laser can paint an aircraft at a mile high, is it the suggestion that a high powered laser can travel 5 miles an issue of faith, or can a reasonable assumption be anything other than faith based?
If I watch a guy on video travel 30 miles south, 30 miles east, and 30 miles back to camp, due north, is that jew media faith? Or, does all science in your world depend on being at the test site with your own equipment, doing the test yourself. And even if you did, would that be jew media for everyone else?
Now, you prove flat earth in a way that I can do the experiment. You dismiss all the evidence of round earth because we can't perform the experiments ourselves. Which experiment can I perform to show the earth is flat? Maybe you're the one coughing up jew media and academia.
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:59:13 ago (+7/-0)
Like Jesus fucking Christ you autistic screech. Just calm the fuck down and prove your claims and have a convo if you actually care about the topic at all.
Prove it.
Prove their distance from us, and prove they’re just wondering.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 01:04:34 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] 3Whuurs
[ - ] 3Whuurs 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 02:26:18 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:40:05 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:29:47 ago (+8/-1)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:35:22 ago (+2/-5)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:59:46 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:02:59 ago (+3/-5)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:25:21 ago (+5/-1)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:04:17 ago (+2/-0)
There. I tried to help. Some retarded people don't get it. Should I explain what the word "YOU" means or do you need a dictionary approved by the jews?
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 23:00:11 ago (+2/-3)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 03:02:14 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 07:23:35 ago (+2/-0)
If planets were "wandering stars" then why does the planet we live on have a dark side? If planets glow, why do we have a nighttime?
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:09:26 ago (+1/-3)
Because the sun is closer. Literally the same reason they wouldn't illuminate the earth like the moon does. The claim isn't that all stars are the same distance as the sun. The claim is that they are not as far away as jew academia claims.
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:21:42 ago (+10/-3)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:25:36 ago (+3/-5)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:29:23 ago (+7/-2)
The burden of proof is on you.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:31:51 ago (+2/-5)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:33:41 ago (+6/-1)
Prove it.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:36:30 ago (+1/-6)*
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:41:16 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:01:51 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:05:39 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:47:36 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] Tallest_Skil
[ - ] Tallest_Skil 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:07:51 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:17:36 ago (+0/-4)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:36:12 ago (+7/-1)
Logical fallacy - asking people to prove a negative and suggesting that the lack of the ability to do so, somehow, adds credibility to your claims. It doesn't.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 23:04:22 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 06:31:38 ago (+2/-1)
You have also suggested that the earth is flat. If that's true prove it.
No one is asking you to prove the earth is not round. No one is asking you to prove that the stars are not far away.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:58:02 ago (+0/-2)
2nd of all, the only proof you can provide of said planets is ONLY through a medium of kike propaganda. When we look through our own telescopes, we dont see physical obects akin to what kike media shows us, we aee balls of energy and light. Until you can give me a repeatable scientific experiment to prove otherwise. I dont suggest the earth is flat, all the evidence points to the Earth being completely flat. Ive posted countless threads on these facts in which dissengenious cunts like yourself use pilpul like a kike to dismiss.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 07:03:37 ago (+2/-0)
Yes you have, and no it doesn't. You ignore the facts that point to a round earth and you pick and choose which round earth facts to argue. There is plenty of evidence of a round earth and nothing to suggest the earth is flat.
You have never posted anything that suggests the earth is flat and only tried to suggest that the earth is flat by trying to dispell arguments about the earth being round.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 09:03:05 ago (+2/-0)
Lol!
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:58:50 ago (+6/-1)*
Do you know what a star looks like through the most powerful telescopes we have? A bright dot.
It's the moon that we can see detail in. Planets are just colored dots through a telescope. We can see the sun's aurora detail through filters and blocking the sun's light.
And, there is provable science and the mafs that show how its possible for a telescope to see detail on the moon.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:05:16 ago (+1/-5)
A bright dot, as in a fucking star you absolute fucking morons.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:08:55 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:14:51 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:30:32 ago (+5/-1)
There is no scientific way to measure the distance of a star. That's true. But we can, and have, measured distances to the moon and to planets that have been passed by satellite.
But lemme guess, satellites aren't real and are nothing but jew propaganda, which is an unproven claim that you've made, also.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:49:57 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 21:57:08 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 23:55:40 ago (+5/-1)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 01:21:23 ago (+1/-3)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:53:24 ago (+5/-1)
Galileo's telescope could apparently see the rings around Saturn and its satellites. No one ever doubted this, not even the Catholic church. What got Galileo in trouble with the pope was that he wrote a book ridiculing the pope himself for not automatically ratifying Galileo's entire system of cosmology, which was mostly wrong.
So, dude, planets are NOT wandering stars. And yes, since it's your assertion, the burden of proof is on you to prove it. Until then, I'm going to believe you're a provocateur jew.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:01:46 ago (+1/-4)*
Saturn does have visible rings around it, doesnt prove its a solid object nor a planet.
You are making assumptions like every other globetard does.
The burdon of proof is on those that claim the stars are solid objects even though nobody has ever gone to one let alone it would be impossible for light to bounce and reflect of the sun at such distances.
The only proof you fuckheads are basing your worldview of is kike propaganda, printed and pumped out in kike media and academia.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:04:08 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:06:12 ago (+0/-5)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:11:43 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:21:15 ago (+2/-1)
Lol. The argument is that you only reference jew propaganda. The only way for you to prove the earth is a ball is to reference jew propaganda.
Now on the other hand, there are countless proofs that you could witness for yourself.
Like calm flat water. It shouldn't exist on a ball hurling through space.
The stars should not be in the same place as ancient history stars.
Pilots and bridge engineers should include the curvature in their equations. I know pilots and engineers. They don't.
The horizon should lower significantly when flying in a plane. It's still at eye lever.
But you are a moon fagg. Moon faggs are retarded because they believe we could put a man on the moon in the 60s but we destroyed the technology and it's too difficult to rebuild it in 2022. Now that is a special level of retardation.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 07:25:28 ago (+2/-0)
This isn't proof of a flat earth. This is an attempt to prove the earth is not round. And is monumentally stupid.
This is an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
I'm a pilot and an engineer (not a bridge engineer) and they do, but this is, yet again, an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
Yet again, this is not proof of a flat earth but an attempt to prove the earth is not round.
This is simply off topic and irrelevant to the argument. Just meant as an ad hominem.
Now, do you have any proof the the earth is flat that doesn't involve trying to suggest that the earth is not round?
I'm betting not.
You mention pilots. Okay. When you fly from NY to London, looking at a flat map planes travel in an arc, and do not take a straight line. They do this because the earth is round and the arc is shorter than the straight line on a Flat map. Does this require faith in kike media to believe? Is it a grand conspiracy among every air carrier on the planet to intentionally waste everyone's time and all that fuel to push a round earth?
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 12:58:09 ago (+0/-0)
No. But it's evidence that supports flat earth and not ball flying through space.
Flat earth 1
Ball 0
Stars should be different from past
Yes. Because it's evidence that supports flat stationery earth and not a ball flying through space.
Flat earth 2
Ball 0
This would be the perfect opportunity to PROVE me wrong. Why didn't you? Can you not find documented evidence of the thing you says exists? Surely you can provide blueprints Mr. Engineer. So since you can't provide that, this point goes to flat earth.
Flat earth 3
Ball 0
Horizon always at same eye level.
Yet again you failed to understand that this is evidence that supports flat earth and not ball.
Flat earth 4
Ball 0
Moon faggot
Don't care you moon faggot. I won't give a point for this fact but it's a fact nonetheless.
I gave you evidence the earth is flat. 4 different instances that can personally be viewed by anyone. I can't dismiss it simply because it proves your ball theory is retarded. Lol. your response was literally "your trying to prove the earth isn't a ball." I mean, what the fuck do you expect if someone is proving it's flat? It's not both retard and you have no argument.
Look up some books about emergency landings and stop being so retarded.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 13:58:17 ago (+0/-0)
Why would stars be different from the past? The stars appear to move as the earth moves the only time a star is in the same position is when the earth is in very near position as before. Again, you're making shit up. Tonight, I will go outside and look at a star and 6 months from now b that star will appear to have moved. The only consistent star that I know of is the north star, but it even has a range of motion.
Blueprints for what? And how does me not providing blueprints prove a flat earth. Just proof you don't understand what words mean.
On the moon. Is it real? Is it round? Is it a projection? Which psycho boat are you in regarding the moon?
None of what you posted here is evidence of a flat earth. Most of what you said isn't even true. The stars appear to move. Relative motion is a real thing. Pilots and engineers use round earth models all the time.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 14:23:33 ago (+0/-0)
Lol. Flat earth is calm and flat. It's exactly how water would react if it were sitting on a stationery calm flat surface.
You think I made that up? How dumb are you?
But you'd have me believe we're on a rock hurling through space. Ok retard.
Because supposedly everything exploded in a "big bang" and everything is constantly moving away from everything. I think that theory is bullshit because the stars are exactly the same like clockwork.
On flat earth, stars are not balls of fire flying through a vacuum. Space is water. Stars are like this.
Star in a jar
https://youtu.be/sLkNUEVrL14
They have a fixed rotation that works like a clock.
You said you're an engineer that uses the curvature of the earth and your equations. What have you ever engineered that required the curvature?
It proves that you're not an engineer and you're claim that you are and have used the curvature in equations when engineering is false.
I can show you blueprints all day that do not use the curvature. I'd give an example but it's literally everything. Can you show me one that does?
You couldn't understand why I asked you to back up a claim. You said you were an engineer that used the curvature in blueprints. I say you're full of shit and asked you to prove it by giving me one example. If you can't do that, it means my claim that it doesn't exist still holds true which would be evidence that the Earth is flat.
See how that works. You don't get to just say you're an engineer and things exist. You have to prove it. Should be easy if what you're saying is true.
I'm saying you don't know what the moon is and neither do I. You were told what it is. You believe what you were told. I was told what it is. I don't trust those mutherfuckers because they lie about everything. So I will continue saying "I don't know what the moon is." But you better believe I'm going to call you a retard if you believe that we had the technology to send a man to the moon in 1969 yet we destroyed it and it's too difficult to build it in 2022.
You are truly retard. Flat calm water might not prove the earth is flat and stationery alone. But it is indeed evidence that it is. God you are dumb.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:51:52 ago (+0/-2)
These people need to relearn the basics, such as how our eyeballs process information and can only see limited distances before everything converges into the horizon. I appreciate you joining in the discussion mate.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 23:19:21 ago (+1/-1)
It's not hard for people here to agree that the majority of the world is retarded and brainwashed by jewish propaganda and academia but mention how every single "proof" that the earth is a ball is provided by the same exact monster and now it's a ridiculous notion to believe science and academia is corrupted. It's like they believe they can lie about shit like covid, but they'd never lie to you about what's outside our sun's reach.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:16:20 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:33:00 ago (+4/-1)
The flight path Nancy Pelosi took to Taiwan relied upon calculations based on a curved, round, earth and not a flat one.
[ + ] PrincessRobotBubblegum
[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 23:13:02 ago (+3/-0)*
Fascinating.
::: ::: :::
Correction: Manichaeans.
Troglodytes of another name though, eh?
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 07:21:22 ago (+2/-0)
Even if you are right no one will listen to someone who conducts themselves in such a manner.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 17:43:14 ago (+0/-2)
The human eye can only see certain distances before the horizon converges and compresses into a pixel. This is a fundemental law of physics in which we visualize the plane we live on. We are physically incapable of looking at objects thousands of miles away due to this.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 18:28:33 ago (+2/-1)
In space, with our space telescopes, we can see reflected light from extreme distances.
Light sources can be seen from even further away.
You are so incredibly smooth-brained it's an utter waste of resources to continue any further.
That or you're a trolling jew.
Probably a jew, since your username is eliciting drama from another website, which is something a kike would find cool.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 19:01:25 ago (+0/-2)
There is no proof that these exist. There are claims and photographa provided by kikes, similarly to holohoax and climate change.
I simply find all of your illogical conclusions to be hillarious.
The other funny thing about all of you cunts is you pick and choose when to assign atmospheric distortion to comfort your views.
You will mock flat earthers by asking why we cant see the beijing fish markets yet on the same hand claim that we can only see planets millions of miles away because of a lack of atmosphere. The mental gymnastics is exactly on par with leftists
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 19:21:37 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 21:49:10 ago (+0/-2)
You are picking and choosing.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 01:01:07 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] gaybeeye
[ - ] gaybeeye 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:23:01 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:39:52 ago (+3/-1)
Do you feel that this picture of earth in that video shows a flat earth?
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:46:48 ago (+1/-2)
Horizon would be lower than eye level and look at you fucking REE about a song to detract from the facts in the video.
Continue to be a fucking ignorant cunt mate.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 01:02:48 ago (+2/-1)
Don't be a drongo.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 01:25:32 ago (+1/-2)
If you were on a ball and you raise yourself off that ball, the horizon isn't going to be at your fucking eye level, is it. You cunts seriously piss me off by failing to comprehend such simple logic.
If you were on a ball and you flew up higher then the ball, you would have to look down to see the horizon of the ball. Since we are on an infinite flat plane, the horizon will always remain at eye level, merging everything in the distance into a skydeck horizon.
Don't be a bogan.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 01:33:12 ago (+2/-1)*
How much could you raise yourself off that ball if that "ball"/globe has a radius of 6,371 km and you are less than 2m tall?
Perspective; we can see the curvature from space but you think space is fake and gay
Don't be a bogan.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 02:25:23 ago (+0/-2)
https://earthcurvature.com/
https://www.omnicalculator.com/physics/earth-curvature
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/index.html?d0=30&h0=10&unit=imperial
There are plenty of curvature calculators to work this out. Pick one of any because none of them are pro-flat earth links. We don't believe in curvature, these were created in an attempt to disprove the flat earth yet it does the opposite.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 02:30:47 ago (+2/-0)
So you are at North Stradbroke and reckon you can barely make out a 4x4 30m away, but the highest elevation on straddie is 237m so at the peak elevation you could see some 55km to the horizon you nonce.
Now I understand why you are a concreter by trade.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 06:37:38 ago (+2/-1)
If you think the earth is flat, prove it. Stop trying to prove the earth is not round. That's the whole point about but being able to prove a negative. You can't. And no one is expecting you to do it.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:18:59 ago (+1/-5)
Light from lasers dissapates after 5 miles or less, you absolute fucking retards.
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:23:17 ago (+8/-2)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:28:02 ago (+1/-5)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 6 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:30:20 ago (+6/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:32:57 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 7 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:34:28 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 21:37:21 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:26:05 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:06:06 ago (+5/-0)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:10:48 ago (+1/-4)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:16:30 ago (+5/-1)
This is not an impossible feat.
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -5 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:17:54 ago (+0/-5)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:22:53 ago (+4/-1)
This is how you sound.
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:47:12 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] AOUsNameIsDavid
[ - ] AOUsNameIsDavid [op] -3 points 2.7 yearsAug 3, 2022 22:58:15 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 03:50:17 ago (+1/-0)
At least not any more of a theory than you have 2 arms and 2 eyes.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty -1 points 2.7 yearsAug 4, 2022 22:24:35 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 07:13:44 ago (+1/-0)
This doesn't require faith in jewish academia. Am I supposed to buy a high powered commercial laser designed for travel to prove this?
Another example. If you were to travel from the magnetic north pole, due south for 30 miles, turn 90° due east and travel for 30 miles, then turn 90° back due north, you would travel 30 miles back to your original spot.
Now, because I can't physically go to the magnetic north pole, am I relying on jew media and jew academia to know this is true?
There are literally dozens of ways the earth is shown to be round that do not require jewish media or kike academia to be believed. But because I can't physically run the experiment myself, I subject to a kikisms? It's fucking retarded.
[ + ] McNasty
[ - ] McNasty 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 13:17:06 ago (+0/-0)
Yes it does. Are you buying the Lazer or are you taking it on faith?
This example doesn't prove anything. The north pole is center on the the flat earth. It would work the same way. I need examples that support your theory and not mine also.
How are you not?
Also you
So which is it? Are there dozens I can do myself or can I not physically do them?
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 13:48:59 ago (+0/-0)
The equilateral triangle example - You could perform the same experiment and get the same results on traveling distances from the south pole. Is the south pole also the center of the flat earth?
Jew media and jew academia. What is this? You seem to suggest that it's any information that you can't get yourself. A million dollar science experiment is "jew media" or "jew academia" unless you are able and willing to spend the million dollars and do it yourself. And even if you did spend the b money and do it yourself, it would still be jew media and jew academia for everyone else but you. Is there any information that can be used without the DIY requirement?
Do the experiment or take it on faith. Is that the only two options? If a hand held toy laser can paint an aircraft at a mile high, is it the suggestion that a high powered laser can travel 5 miles an issue of faith, or can a reasonable assumption be anything other than faith based?
If I watch a guy on video travel 30 miles south, 30 miles east, and 30 miles back to camp, due north, is that jew media faith? Or, does all science in your world depend on being at the test site with your own equipment, doing the test yourself. And even if you did, would that be jew media for everyone else?
Now, you prove flat earth in a way that I can do the experiment. You dismiss all the evidence of round earth because we can't perform the experiments ourselves. Which experiment can I perform to show the earth is flat? Maybe you're the one coughing up jew media and academia.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 0 points 2.7 yearsAug 5, 2022 14:00:39 ago (+0/-0)
https://youtu.be/ouOYAlcvwOQ
Literally hundreds of videos demonstrating this.