Ya know one of the things I really liked about old Voat? Fucking drama queens were ridiculed, laughed at, and told to fuck off. Their personal vendettas with each other never got upvoated to the front page, because the vast majority of us weren't faggot losers acting like 19-year-old bitches....
Theres a pretty clear difference between what I've seen of what you've posted and the infant on Nevermind. And I don't even count what(of yours) I've seen as CP.
Nevermind sends a very clear msg about consumerism and the dollar. Being an infant and being 'fished' is a part of that msg. There is Zero erotification of that child. This is why you'd need to be a pedo to read pedo into it.
While I don't think what you've posted reaches the legal level of cp, there is a very clear erotic element in it. And it's very clearly intentional.
Your motivation for posting it, I'm not going to bother pondering.
In the end it comes down to the Admins and mods of the sites in question.
Based on what I've seen, I'm not sure. You could be a legit pedo, or a troll, or both. idk
While I don't think what you've posted reaches the legal level of cp, there is a very clear erotic element in it. And it's very clearly intentional. Your motivation for posting it, I'm not going to bother pondering. In the end it comes down to the Admins and mods of the sites in question. Based on what I've seen, I'm not sure. You could be a legit pedo, or a troll, or both. idk
That's entirely what it comes down to. This isn't just trying to distinguish nudity and sexualization. It's trying to blur the lines and to see how close one can come to transgressing without actually breaking any specific rule. And it's clearly done in bad faith, and everyone can see it.
In the mid-20th century, jews were at the forefront in defending literature with transgressive content (Ulysses, Lady Chatterly's Lover, etc.) saying they were defensible because they were literature, and literature is considered free speech. This is nothing more than than a 21st century version of this using modern technology and current values. And no one is buying it.
I'm still going to say it's like a child in the backseat of a car tormenting his brother and saying "I'm not touching you! I'm not touching you!" And it's just as childish.
I understand the correlation you're trying to make. Imgs are often very subjective, but there really isn't a comparison between the two things.
What I am aware of in what youve posted at least often has a clear and intentional erotic element to it. Please don't deny all that Mark Ryden or whatever didn't. It did, and it was intentional. The photos you've posted are chosen specifically to ride that line as close as you can. You can deny that. But I for one won't believe it.
I've spent a large part of 50 years pulling apart visual images, the msgs they send, how they are received and interpreted. That entire subject is a large part of what my art is about. I am very, very familiar w this subject.
You can only hide behind 'thats just your interpretation' for so long
I think he's refuting an argument that was made, not trying to claim 1:1 correlation. Or rather providing additional weight to a refutation the admin of the site made.
All right then, Dangus and friends can't handle you so I guess I'm going to have to.
"Nudity is not necessary sexualized." Correct
No, but it is offensive especially to Europeans. But hey if you want to live and act like a nigger, go ahead, just do it somewhere else.
"There's a difference between a sexualized image and whether you find it sexually arousing."
Has anyone called you out as a kike yet? You can use this argument for literal porn, by saying it's artistic. But again, kike, if you want to live and act like a nigger, then go ahead, just do it where such niggerish behavior is welcome.
This all goes back to what Kurt Cobain said about the cover of Nevermind: "If you’re offended by this you must be a closet pedophile"
If you're offended by images of people being tortured, it's because you're a sadist. If you're offended by images of corpses, it's because you're a necrophile.
The argument can be applied to damn near anything, and relies on the false premise that offense is born out of repressed desires. It's not mind you but you don't understand that because you're a kike. The reason people get offended is because they find something to be disgusting. People, you know human beings, the thing you aren't, get offended when they believe children are being put in danger, it sets off their protective instincts. So why do people get offended by naked children, well that's easy, it's because they automatically, and rightfully recognize that publicly nudity is wrong, that public nudity of a child is extremely wrong, and that the individuals that groomed them for those pictures, have a notable history of pedophilia, even if that history is within the industry and not the individual themselves. The offense you observe is born from the protective instincts. You of course know this, but you are driven by disturbed and perverse desires, so you try, and fail, to push your own psychotic desires on those offended. Of all this of course is textbook kike behavior.
I love the dead silence after SV says he finds me to be a very respectful, intelligent, and sensible guy.
Which doesn't mean a whole lot since he was just talking about committing suicide. His head is no where near being in the right place. You know this, but the only people you can get to defend you are borderline psychotics.
"Hands Up" photo dingus claims is child pornography (it isn't).
No but it is disgusting, and you deserve far more vitriol than you've received.
The video seems to only have one segment of chat. Also if there was nudity you should probably mark the post as adult to give pearl clutchers one less reason to complain. Im not in a position to tell others what to do and its unreasonable to ask one to be the bigger man and not the other but all this stuff is needless drama that should probably get ignored.
Sorry I misinterpreted that and somehow thought you intended to included the image being complained about. Yes I have. I said it was unreasonable and that im in no position to tell others what to do for a reason. I could do without this all the same. I never see whatever reddit tier thing a handful of people are losing their minds over but I do see all the emotional investment into the drama.
[ + ] i_hate_sodomites
[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 7 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:53:22 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] lord_nougat
[ - ] lord_nougat 2 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:56:15 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] loud_niglet
[ - ] loud_niglet 4 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:27:14 ago (+6/-2)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:35:43 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 3 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:49:04 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 20:26:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 21:01:38 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 15:01:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 2 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:23:43 ago (+2/-0)
Nevermind sends a very clear msg about consumerism and the dollar. Being an infant and being 'fished' is a part of that msg. There is Zero erotification of that child. This is why you'd need to be a pedo to read pedo into it.
While I don't think what you've posted reaches the legal level of cp, there is a very clear erotic element in it. And it's very clearly intentional.
Your motivation for posting it, I'm not going to bother pondering.
In the end it comes down to the Admins and mods of the sites in question.
Based on what I've seen, I'm not sure. You could be a legit pedo, or a troll, or both. idk
But comparing it to Nevermind is ridiculous.
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 2 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:48:35 ago (+2/-0)
Your motivation for posting it, I'm not going to bother pondering.
In the end it comes down to the Admins and mods of the sites in question.
Based on what I've seen, I'm not sure. You could be a legit pedo, or a troll, or both. idk
That's entirely what it comes down to. This isn't just trying to distinguish nudity and sexualization. It's trying to blur the lines and to see how close one can come to transgressing without actually breaking any specific rule. And it's clearly done in bad faith, and everyone can see it.
In the mid-20th century, jews were at the forefront in defending literature with transgressive content (Ulysses, Lady Chatterly's Lover, etc.) saying they were defensible because they were literature, and literature is considered free speech. This is nothing more than than a 21st century version of this using modern technology and current values. And no one is buying it.
I'm still going to say it's like a child in the backseat of a car tormenting his brother and saying "I'm not touching you! I'm not touching you!" And it's just as childish.
[ + ] ThisGuy
[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 00:36:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 04:55:52 ago (+0/-0)*
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:35:16 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] TheViciousMrPim
[ - ] TheViciousMrPim 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:45:47 ago (+1/-0)
What I am aware of in what youve posted at least often has a clear and intentional erotic element to it. Please don't deny all that Mark Ryden or whatever didn't. It did, and it was intentional. The photos you've posted are chosen specifically to ride that line as close as you can. You can deny that. But I for one won't believe it.
I've spent a large part of 50 years pulling apart visual images, the msgs they send, how they are received and interpreted. That entire subject is a large part of what my art is about. I am very, very familiar w this subject.
You can only hide behind 'thats just your interpretation' for so long
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.5 yearsDec 20, 2022 15:52:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 21:01:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 21:03:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 14:41:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Gowithit
[ - ] Gowithit 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 18:14:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 4, 2022 20:46:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 19:02:47 ago (+1/-1)*
Correct
But again, kike, if you want to live and act like a nigger, then go ahead, just do it where such niggerish behavior is welcome.
The argument can be applied to damn near anything, and relies on the false premise that offense is born out of repressed desires. It's not mind you but you don't understand that because you're a kike.
The reason people get offended is because they find something to be disgusting. People, you know human beings, the thing you aren't, get offended when they believe children are being put in danger, it sets off their protective instincts. So why do people get offended by naked children, well that's easy, it's because they automatically, and rightfully recognize that publicly nudity is wrong, that public nudity of a child is extremely wrong, and that the individuals that groomed them for those pictures, have a notable history of pedophilia, even if that history is within the industry and not the individual themselves.
The offense you observe is born from the protective instincts. You of course know this, but you are driven by disturbed and perverse desires, so you try, and fail, to push your own psychotic desires on those offended. Of all this of course is textbook kike behavior.
You know this, but the only people you can get to defend you are borderline psychotics.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 20:42:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:25:01 ago (+0/-0)
Im not in a position to tell others what to do and its unreasonable to ask one to be the bigger man and not the other but all this stuff is needless drama that should probably get ignored.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:38:08 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 18:44:10 ago (+0/-0)*
Yes I have. I said it was unreasonable and that im in no position to tell others what to do for a reason.
I could do without this all the same. I never see whatever reddit tier thing a handful of people are losing their minds over but I do see all the emotional investment into the drama.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 -1 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 00:35:02 ago (+0/-1)
Nice to know.
[ + ] Deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2.9 yearsAug 1, 2022 14:34:59 ago (+0/-0)