do you believe this crap?: "Yale scientists" say testing for COVID-19 at door of events reduces spreading risk by almost half - Upgoat

do you believe this crap?: "Yale scientists" say testing for COVID-19 at door of events reduces spreading risk by almost half
submitted by knightwarrior41 to Health 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 21:47:28 ago (+11/-0) (www.msn.com)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/yale-scientists-say-testing-for-covid-19-at-door-of-events-reduces-spreading-risk-by-almost-half/ar-AA104K16?ocid=BingHp01&cvid=3acfa39006e741bad16ac33f5c6eb775

[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 4 points 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 21:52:15 ago (+4/-0)

The tests are wildly unreliable. Do they think we’ve forgotten that?

The bitches on the View once got hustled off the stage because two had tested positive. They kept retesting them and they got 2 positive, three negative.

Elon Musk with all his cash used to test himself for fun and post that the results were completely random. That really chapped the lefts ass.

[ - ] paul_neri -2 points 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 21:57:24 ago (+0/-2)

Good idea.

[ + ] diggernicks

[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 22:37:36 ago (+2/-0)

Best be joking boot licker

[ - ] Fascinus 4 points 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 22:43:15 ago (+4/-0)

Sanitized link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/yale-scientists-say-testing-for-covid-19-at-door-of-events-reduces-spreading-risk-by-almost-half/ar-AA104K16

Archive link: https://archive.ph/qtSH3

[ + ] knightwarrior41

[ - ] knightwarrior41 [op] 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:26:33 ago (+2/-0)

as always thank you very much

[ - ] calx 8 points 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 23:03:47 ago (+8/-0)

I don't believe anything anymore that comes out of universities, gov, or news media.

[ + ] knightwarrior41

[ - ] knightwarrior41 [op] 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:26:12 ago (+0/-0)

me neither

[ - ] x0x7 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 30, 2022 23:07:06 ago (+2/-0)

(((Yale)))

I would believe it through. If the majority of people don't go to events because it's inconvenient, and has a chance of giving them a result that will have them and everyone they know out of work for a while, then with no one going there will be less spread.

[ - ] TheSimulacra 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:11:10 ago (+1/-1)

Why would it not.
If you screen for the flu at an event, and don't let the people in who have the flu, then wouldn't the result be spreading less flu?

Even if you kick out 20 random people, the chance for spreading any disease lessens.

You seem to be missing the point, and Yale is just spouting propaganda. What they said is not false.

[ - ] HeyJames 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:19:25 ago (+0/-0)

I say Yale scientists are cucked faggots

[ - ] boekanier 2 points 2.8 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:38:41 ago (+2/-0)

'scientists' or paid propagandists for big pharma?

Sign into an existing account