Same thing with the American revolution, whether it was the colonists or the British crown, the jews were poised to back the winners, and bail out the jews on the losing end of the conflict.
For a good illustration of their technique, you should read the manga "liar's game" at the part where they play the game "minority".
The game of "minority" in case you don't know how to play, is to be one of the last players standing after a series of votes that each eliminate the majority, which means you need to be the one to be in the minority of each vote to remain in the game till the end.
"liar's game" is one of those manga about people stuck playing a single game or a series of games in order to either win money, pay of a debt, or save their own lives. In this one, it's the "debt game" variety, combined with the "win money" genre, it's a series of gambles over various games ranging from children's games, to party games, to straight up casino style gambling, always with an element of forced teamwork and sudden betrayal in order to win.
So the crossdressing and flamboyantly gay villain of the series is acting like the jew does, he makes his alliances with many groups of people who each decide to split their votes in half, and share the reward money via contracts issued and enforced by the Liar's Game, the villain is therefore playing every side, and whoever loses, they win, especially because they managed to shuffle of the debts of their contract early before the game even properly began (and was still in demonstration/tutorial).
they even funded the crusades lol. although considering the 'Templars' received the temple, became bankers, were banned same time as the jews then joined with the jews to create freemasonry which is all about rebuilding the temple and has since gone on to create israel and judeo supremacy, there may have been a zionist goal to it.
"Many crusaders had to go into debt in order to purchase weaponry and equipment for the expedition; as Western Catholicism strictly forbade usury, many crusaders inevitably found themselves indebted to Jewish moneylenders."
"Jewish money was also used in France for financing the Second Crusade; the Jews were also attacked in many instances, but not on the scale of the attacks of 1096."
took me 5 secs to find that. not gonna bother to go in depth on how the whole expeditions were financed by jews. the Church sent out a call to arms.. it was the kings who took on the financial burden, who could only do so by borrowing. you were saying, faggot?
Could we not get people together to pool their resources? And use those to make even more money? How about we begin a parallel economy with its own currency, like choosing some random item you could have a bunch of and making it serve the role of our economy's money (as in, they all agree to only accept this thing as legal tender in exchange for their goods and services)?
Whether one regards someone like Haym Salomon as subversive has much to do with what one thinks about the American Revolution. I personally have my reservations - but not because I'm keeping score on how it benefited Jews or not.
Of course if one just sees Jews as inherently bad - any good they do is still bad. This isn't a view I subscribe to. I even think it irrational. But I suspect you or others may.
This also seems selective. Jews have often done poorly just in the last couple of centuries in this stuff. Jews were Turk friendly for example and often got the short end of the stick in reversals suffered by the Turks. Maybe most notably in Ottoman Greece where nationalists targeted Jew and Turk alike.
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:24:15 ago (+1/-0)
Whether one regards someone like Haym Salomon as subversive has much to do with what one thinks about the American Revolution. I personally have my reservations - but not because I'm keeping score on how it benefited Jews or not.
Jews certainly benefitted from a government not tied to formal nobility and classes of the time (in which they were almost certainly outcasts). Whether they were part of a grand conspiracy to set it up or not that is certainly up to debate and there just isn't substantial evidence.
Jews were Turk friendly for example and often got the short end of the stick in reversals suffered by the Turks.
They certainly had no problem with the Armenian genocide of Christians
Yeah. The revolution weakened caste and destroyed titled nobility. This was a precedent for equality which set the stage for racial equality or gender equality. Points made in this noted book.
The American Revolution was a social revolution. But it is rarely remembered that way. And yes, Jews benefited from the weakening of caste. So did ordinary whites though. Aristocracy kinda sucks.
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 01:41:02 ago (+1/-0)
This was a precedent for equality which set the stage for racial equality or gender equality.
Which is unfortunate.
Aristocracy kinda sucks.
What is interesting though is that the legal system was carried over. Judges get a royal title and are generally treated as such. In my opinion we are re-entering a caste system. If you look at wealth gains since the 1970s, it has overwhelmingly benefitted those in control of the capital in this country.
Indeed, it was bragged at the world economic forum that they do not need democratic leaders to side with them because they have trillions in combined finance and are an unstoppable force. They're correct, they cannot be stopped without vviolence.
I think capitalists are worse than noblemen were. Which is a testament to how bad capitalists are. Noblemen had more loyalty to the country as their income was usually gained from the land. Capitalists can often afford to just take their wealth and flee the country. Plus capitalists give us the immigrants noblemen rarely did.
Most capitalists are working class, or some kind of middle class. The most wealthy people are communists, socialists, or some other variety of leftist, who are opposed to capitalism, because it threatens their wealth.
Capitalists are best understood as a class themselves. In capitalist states the ruling class, the top 1%, the people that control the commanding heights of society: communications, banks - people that control the means of production coupled with exercising real influence in society. The working class particularly are pretty synonomous with wage labor. The proletariat mostly.
And the average Democrat supporting Wall Street billionaire is far from a Communist. They're liberals. They supported Biden. Not Bernie Sanders. And by liberals we mean social liberals yet basically neoliberals in economics. Which is to say their leftism is cultural not economics particularly. The economic views of a populist like Steve Bannon is at least as left-wing.
An overclass, the wealthy, who use socialist policies to maintain their position at the top, through government intervention in the free market, these types are created and kept where they are in society. They hate capitalism with a passion, only trotting it out with reluctance when the socialist policies they use against other are used against them.
An underclass, these are truly the people people who keep the overclass in power, these are a class of people who produce nothing of value, many are in fact incapable of doing so, but they make up large numbers, and are bribed by the overclass to keep them at their spot on top of the societal hierarchy. The underclass are parasites, they cannot survive except through the "aid" that others are forced into giving them.
Then there's the class in the middle, middle class, working class, productive class, these are the ones who actually do the work that keeps their society running, they pay the taxes, which the overclass uses to maintain their power through the buying of the underclass.
The wealthy overclass uses the productivity of the middle class to bribe the poor underclass into giving them the power to rule, if we want to repair our society, we need to not just kill the rich, but also the poor. Both must go as both are the malignant cancers upon our societies, they create and support each other, and removing just one will allow the other to restore them.
They will use anyone against anyone, the only people whose side a jew is truly on are the jews, aside from that they have no fixed allies, and everyone is an enemy to be dealt with immediately, or an enemy to be dealt with at a later time.
They will even play both sides in a war against jews. Learn about the wars between the Jews and the Romans and how a pharisee convinced an Cesar to spare his sect for help destroying the others.
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 02:35:11 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 10:21:03 ago (+0/-0)
Which funded the crusades
You failed at history
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 10:22:54 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 10:23:57 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod
[ - ] BlueEyedAngloMasterRaceGod 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 10:30:47 ago (+0/-0)
"Jewish money was also used in France for financing the Second Crusade; the Jews were also attacked in many instances, but not on the scale of the attacks of 1096."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhineland_massacres
took me 5 secs to find that. not gonna bother to go in depth on how the whole expeditions were financed by jews. the Church sent out a call to arms.. it was the kings who took on the financial burden, who could only do so by borrowing. you were saying, faggot?
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 10:50:32 ago (+0/-0)
If its on wikipedia a site anyone can edit must be true!
[ + ] PrincessRobotBubblegum
[ - ] PrincessRobotBubblegum 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 01:20:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] boekanier
[ - ] boekanier 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:51:11 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 01:00:46 ago (+0/-0)
Could we not get people together to pool their resources? And use those to make even more money? How about we begin a parallel economy with its own currency, like choosing some random item you could have a bunch of and making it serve the role of our economy's money (as in, they all agree to only accept this thing as legal tender in exchange for their goods and services)?
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 30, 2022 23:18:10 ago (+0/-0)*
Of course if one just sees Jews as inherently bad - any good they do is still bad. This isn't a view I subscribe to. I even think it irrational. But I suspect you or others may.
This also seems selective. Jews have often done poorly just in the last couple of centuries in this stuff. Jews were Turk friendly for example and often got the short end of the stick in reversals suffered by the Turks. Maybe most notably in Ottoman Greece where nationalists targeted Jew and Turk alike.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 00:24:15 ago (+1/-0)
Jews certainly benefitted from a government not tied to formal nobility and classes of the time (in which they were almost certainly outcasts). Whether they were part of a grand conspiracy to set it up or not that is certainly up to debate and there just isn't substantial evidence.
They certainly had no problem with the Armenian genocide of Christians
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 01:31:44 ago (+0/-0)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Radicalism_of_the_American_Revolution
The American Revolution was a social revolution. But it is rarely remembered that way. And yes, Jews benefited from the weakening of caste. So did ordinary whites though. Aristocracy kinda sucks.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 01:41:02 ago (+1/-0)
Which is unfortunate.
What is interesting though is that the legal system was carried over. Judges get a royal title and are generally treated as such. In my opinion we are re-entering a caste system. If you look at wealth gains since the 1970s, it has overwhelmingly benefitted those in control of the capital in this country.
Indeed, it was bragged at the world economic forum that they do not need democratic leaders to side with them because they have trillions in combined finance and are an unstoppable force. They're correct, they cannot be stopped without vviolence.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 02:12:04 ago (+0/-0)
And nobility often fell to revolution...
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 09:27:54 ago (+0/-0)
The most wealthy people are communists, socialists, or some other variety of leftist, who are opposed to capitalism, because it threatens their wealth.
[ + ] Joe_McCarthy
[ - ] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 09:59:28 ago (+0/-0)
And the average Democrat supporting Wall Street billionaire is far from a Communist. They're liberals. They supported Biden. Not Bernie Sanders. And by liberals we mean social liberals yet basically neoliberals in economics. Which is to say their leftism is cultural not economics particularly. The economic views of a populist like Steve Bannon is at least as left-wing.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 10:19:44 ago (+0/-0)
An overclass, the wealthy, who use socialist policies to maintain their position at the top, through government intervention in the free market, these types are created and kept where they are in society. They hate capitalism with a passion, only trotting it out with reluctance when the socialist policies they use against other are used against them.
An underclass, these are truly the people people who keep the overclass in power, these are a class of people who produce nothing of value, many are in fact incapable of doing so, but they make up large numbers, and are bribed by the overclass to keep them at their spot on top of the societal hierarchy. The underclass are parasites, they cannot survive except through the "aid" that others are forced into giving them.
Then there's the class in the middle, middle class, working class, productive class, these are the ones who actually do the work that keeps their society running, they pay the taxes, which the overclass uses to maintain their power through the buying of the underclass.
The wealthy overclass uses the productivity of the middle class to bribe the poor underclass into giving them the power to rule, if we want to repair our society, we need to not just kill the rich, but also the poor. Both must go as both are the malignant cancers upon our societies, they create and support each other, and removing just one will allow the other to restore them.
[ + ] Paradoxical003
[ - ] Paradoxical003 [op] 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 31, 2022 09:30:41 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] x0x7
[ - ] x0x7 0 points 2.9 yearsJul 30, 2022 23:09:18 ago (+0/-0)