Sign into an existing account

Some naively idealistic vision of reality which is simply assumed to be true by those who would greatly prefer it be so.

Then trying to prevent people from learning that their assumptions were wrong, or at the very least, unjustifiable.

Then the denial requires actions to hide the evidence which contradicts the narrative, and a scapegoat to blame for the evidence people do see.

The scape goat is often those to whom it would be of interest for the reality behind the socially acceptable "truth" to be known.

As the reality become harder to deny, the deniers will ramp up the persecution of the doubters and their associated group to compensate.

Eventually it gets to the point where the scapegoats are done away with, by which I mean actively killed to preserve the big lie.

Eventually this leads to the lie being exposed, and the collapse of the society that has by this point been using the lie as a foundational mythology, building up everything upon its a priori assumption to be true.

It becomes the bedrock for the morality of the society, without it, all the pillars would fall, and society ends up having to reevaluate the ideas that ended up at the center of their cultural foundations.

Racism would return, it's inevitable that there will be a return to racial thinking, this this laughed at in liberal circles, but it's nevertheless something that's going to have to happen, especially as we learn more about genetics.

The lie of egalitarianism is becoming much too evident to ignore, the impact of ignoring it upon people is top great and too personal, we will see a death of the assumption of equality, both in ability and morality, between the races.

As we approach this great reveal, we can expect the hatred directed toward white people, the designated scapegoat, to escalate to horrifying levels, open war will be called, and there will be racial purges of whites unlike that which we've seen up til now, the media will cheer it on, as they are in fact some of the greatest purveyors of this type of cultural mythology.

What should happen as a response that will save us is that we react in a similar way, the natural effective counter to being a hated race of people is to adopt an ideology of supremacy for our race.

We try to make the best case for our people, and that includes making the case that other races are far inferior to our own.

The centrists and mainstream right want to meet them halfway, agreeing with the myth of egalitarianism, but denying the scapegoating of whites as the cause for the observed discrepancies which threaten this dogmatic assumption.

This doesn't work because removing the excuse means revealing the truth, and making it evident, but refusing to make your denial of the facts seem reasonable.

If the evidence that egalitarianism is false is right there, and there is no excusing it without admitting the falsehood of the egalitarian assumption, then it's essentially the same as rejecting the claim that all races are statistically the same when it comes to personality and ability.

It's like telling a Christian to openly express doubts regarding the beliefs of their faith, it's not an position they would accept because doubt is the gateway to disbelief amd we all know it to be true. It why they require faith to begin with.

Also consider that the state which our countries are in rest upon the assumption of egalitarianism in so many ways.

The assumption covers for the jews, it makes the holocaust unjustifiable, without the jews being unjustifiably mistreated by the nazis, we lose our symbol of evil in Adolf Hitler.

Without a definition of evil, a society cannot function, I've said before that the essence of a civilization is the police, everything else is able to be discarded but the enforcement of some law.

For laws to exist, we need to know what evil looks like, without egalitarianism, we lose that vital aspect of our society.

So how about we propose an alternative? That's what the centrists and mainstream right does.

Yeah, and they suggest the foundation of what their countries used to be built upon, things like liberty.

The problem is that our countries don't have that as their foundations anymore, much construction was made after the switch occurred, and all of that will come tumbling down if we try to change it back.

It's much easier to transition from freedom to an imposing government than it would be for the reverse to be done.

This is because after the government implements all this expansion, it becomes the new monopoly on these services, people adapt to the safety nets that were put up, and when you remove them, a lot of people will just up and die as a result.

New Hampshire used to not have animal control, they got on fine as it was founded by settlers who had done the work of keeping the wildlife under control, they knew how to live such that bears wouldn't be a problem.

This was forgotten after a time since the animal control services were put in place within the state.

So when the libertarians removed animal control, there was an outbreak of people being attacked by bears, both in the state and in neighboring states as well.

In the short term, removing some supporting service upon which people had come to rely, will result in those people suffering and dying because the thing they needed is no longer there.

Libertarians aren't surprised that things get worse once they assume power and start stripping out government to get it down to the most indispensable components, they know damn well what would occur when they cut a government monopoly and leave things to the private individuals to sort out for themselves.

They do it because they know that the private alternatives which do emerge in absence of government will be superior, and the government will no linger be able to use the power that its monopoly gives it against its own people, the suffering will be well worth it in the long term.

Most leftists failed the marshmallow test, they ate the sweet immediately, rather than being able to wait until the amount of sweets they would get was multiplied.

They see the immediate fallout and assume it'd be a permanent fixture of the place, that the outbreak of a crisis is a sign that libertarian policies fail.

They don't realize that it's all part of the design, and that the libertarians are playing the game with their eyes on the long term effects, not just the immediate.

When you stop trying to make things appear as if egalitarianism is true through laws which produce the racial discrimination that makes the numbers "look right" (as if all races were equal).

When people and businesses can discriminate against any individual or group on any basis they choose, the result is a meritocracy.

Under a meritocracy those with lesser amounts of the abilities which are in demand will be left without a place in society, they will be poor and at the mercy of others, a sizable number of blacks will become dependent upon the kindness of whites, for example.

Furthermore, with these freedoms of disassociation, races will segregate themselves into their own communities, there will be mixed areas between, but no one will actually live there except the very poor.

For the most part, each race will keep to themselves, various micro ethnostates Will form, and they may even split up even further from there.

That's not something that most people will support of they were to see the whole picture.