You're largely guilty of the former of the latter, i.e.
Negative false information
i always spoke against the self destruction of illegal speech and violence.
Could you at least put a little effort into being a subversive little shit? I'm getting bored. In one breath you say you are standing against European genocide. In the next, you say Europeans shouldn't engage in "illegal" speech and violence. What's the punishment going to be? To be genocided slightly faster? There's no rational reason not to say what you want to say, for the punishment will happen regardless of whether or not you do.
why do you impugn my character just for having a disagreement about whether a white advocate should be committing crimes? reasonable people can believe that the system will come down harder on white nationalism if WNs commit crimes.
but on this topic, i do believe illegal nonviolent speech in europe, where prowhite speech is banned, is usually good.
the illegal speech i oppose is violence, which gets people arrested and makes WN ideas look bad to normies. i dont know of any other illegal speech i would oppose.
why do you impugn my character just for having a disagreement about whether a white advocate should be committing crimes?
Curling up and asking why someone is attacking you, only works against my kin. For me, it only encourages me to kick harder for the insult. I told you that the information you were getting from the bowels of twitter was false, created by mostly bots and kikes to cause you suffering. You again brought up the topic, but this time chose reddit. Again I told you it was exactly like twitter, and that if you keep scraping through those shitheaps to find such degenerative bullshit to force in our faces, that I would know that your intentions were harmful in nature and act accordingly. You did it a third time, and I called you out as the kike you are.
You ruined your own character, because like all kikes, quitting while you are ahead is an alien concept to you.
reasonable people can believe that the system will come down harder on white nationalism if WNs commit crimes.
It mostly can't due to how extreme it already is, and what little it can still do to come down even harder, it has shown it will do regardless of our actions. Rhodesia, and South Africa are proof of what I am saying.
but on this topic, i do believe illegal nonviolent speech in europe, where prowhite speech is banned, is usually good.
Sure like Carl Benjamin. When shitskin invaders are raping and torturing their way across the country, just call for sending them back, rather than any proportional response like executing them for their crimes. To put it bluntly, what you're advocating for, is what all controlled opposition advocates for. Recognize the problem to get the normal fags to resonate with you, then give them solutions that don't work, and are harmful to them.
the illegal speech i oppose is violence, which gets people arrested and makes WN ideas look bad to normies. i dont know of any other illegal speech i would oppose.
I do believe the concept your pushing can be simply called "optics cucking".
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 28, 2022 16:07:02 ago (+1/-0)
Negative false information, or true information followed by negative self destructive solutions is a blackpill.
You know the difference, which is why I and others called you out as being a kike when you continued doing the latter.
What you posted in this thread would be a redpill for anyone that didn't already know.
[ + ] oppressed
[ - ] oppressed [op] 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 28, 2022 21:53:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 29, 2022 00:46:17 ago (+0/-0)
In one breath you say you are standing against European genocide. In the next, you say Europeans shouldn't engage in "illegal" speech and violence.
What's the punishment going to be? To be genocided slightly faster? There's no rational reason not to say what you want to say, for the punishment will happen regardless of whether or not you do.
[ + ] oppressed
[ - ] oppressed [op] 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 29, 2022 10:28:25 ago (+0/-0)
but on this topic, i do believe illegal nonviolent speech in europe, where prowhite speech is banned, is usually good.
the illegal speech i oppose is violence, which gets people arrested and makes WN ideas look bad to normies. i dont know of any other illegal speech i would oppose.
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 29, 2022 12:35:18 ago (+0/-0)
I told you that the information you were getting from the bowels of twitter was false, created by mostly bots and kikes to cause you suffering. You again brought up the topic, but this time chose reddit. Again I told you it was exactly like twitter, and that if you keep scraping through those shitheaps to find such degenerative bullshit to force in our faces, that I would know that your intentions were harmful in nature and act accordingly. You did it a third time, and I called you out as the kike you are.
You ruined your own character, because like all kikes, quitting while you are ahead is an alien concept to you.
To put it bluntly, what you're advocating for, is what all controlled opposition advocates for. Recognize the problem to get the normal fags to resonate with you, then give them solutions that don't work, and are harmful to them.