An example is "student loans", basically state enforced and implemented usury (a sin and destroyer of nations). There are 3 solutions that I can see: Remove the interest rate so that people pay back what is borrowed, but nothing else; have a set amount that will be repaid (no interest, but penalty for borrowing); ending the program completely and moving it to the private sector without government guarantees (allow bankruptcy, very high risk for debt holders).
The 3rd of these would mean that schools would have to change drastically; they wouldn't be able to bring in worthless students anymore, no more diversity quotas, no more worthless programs, etc. But all of these make this not politically feasible.
The 1st and 2nd ones are solutions that people would support. Any politician who said these would get support of 75+% of the population. So why isn't it proposed? Why is the only proposal to cancel current debt, but allowing new debt to happen? Because this is something that the female thinkers (leftists) will strongly support, and the male thinkers (productive class) will be against it; causing a strong divide that is then moved to "red vs. blue".
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 28, 2022 10:04:06 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] GoldenAgeWhen
[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 1 point 2.8 yearsJul 28, 2022 10:08:49 ago (+1/-0)
An example is "student loans", basically state enforced and implemented usury (a sin and destroyer of nations). There are 3 solutions that I can see: Remove the interest rate so that people pay back what is borrowed, but nothing else; have a set amount that will be repaid (no interest, but penalty for borrowing); ending the program completely and moving it to the private sector without government guarantees (allow bankruptcy, very high risk for debt holders).
The 3rd of these would mean that schools would have to change drastically; they wouldn't be able to bring in worthless students anymore, no more diversity quotas, no more worthless programs, etc. But all of these make this not politically feasible.
The 1st and 2nd ones are solutions that people would support. Any politician who said these would get support of 75+% of the population. So why isn't it proposed? Why is the only proposal to cancel current debt, but allowing new debt to happen? Because this is something that the female thinkers (leftists) will strongly support, and the male thinkers (productive class) will be against it; causing a strong divide that is then moved to "red vs. blue".
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks -2 points 2.8 yearsJul 28, 2022 11:47:23 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] BitterVeteran
[ - ] BitterVeteran 0 points 2.8 yearsJul 28, 2022 20:44:39 ago (+0/-0)