Sign into an existing account

So basically, destroy the white race in order to save it. Destroy white culture in order to save it. Do something that we never did before to become more like we used to be.


Lets start with the Arabs since the NW Europeans didn’t do this for thousands of years.

Every male is not guaranteed at least one wife. Have you done the math? The birth sex ratio is 1:1. Muslims only make this work by stealing women from other men, either within their own nation or in the nation they’re at war with. You expect fathers/brothers to make the best matches for their women or for society? They won’t. Males will make the matches that enrich themselves. Evolution predicts this. Men who sell their daughters to the highest bidder will become the most reproductively successful. They will sell to older males and males from wealthier families. Younger/poorer males will have no one to wed, have sex with. What could go wrong when you have millions of males in their twenties who have no one to have sex with? Will they work? Or fight and rape? Or just engage in rent seeking behavior and economic cheating.

Natural selection is real. You will select for the personality traits that muslims have. You are incentivizing greed and corruption and the result will be a low trust society with high wealth disparity. You know how whites are in southern and eastern europe? Like that. Is that the best in europe?

The Germanics never did this. The germanics had self selection. The only europeans that did alot of this marriage arranging was the nobility and a few of the crappy parts of Europe. The nobility are half the problem right now. They are almost as bad as jews. These elite white men regularly betray the other men of their nation. They are a corrupt subgroup descended from white warlords who enslaved other whites and stole their women. They are degenerate because they are a form of white trash, and their mercenary mating habits and enslavement of other whites are the cause of it.

Because women have had a greater power over their choice in mates, white civilzation has been shaped, white men have been shaped. The behavioral traits white men have been selected for —their personalities and skill sets — have been molded by this process. The preferences of high value white women had more in influence over the traits of men than in any other society in the world. That influence was strongest in northwest europe. When you destroy the preference of white women in the equation you will replace it with something else— male intrasexual selection pressure. Dog-eat-dog. Just like the muzzies.

You will maximize disparity of reproductive opportunity among white men. That will destroy the egalitarian nature of white men.

Really what white women are choosing today—to put off marriage for a career and for recreational screwing— is exactly what white men started to do in the 20th century. You listen to the complaints of women who are afraid of getting tied down, they sound exactly like white guys did 50 years ago. Back then men had women over a barrel. The could fuck around until 35 or 40, and then take from the kiddie pool. That would have been unheard of for most white men before then, other than a few degenerate aristocrats. Men got married at 24 before that. But in the 20th century they wanted the luxury of an extended adolescence. Now the shoe is on the other foot, and you don’t like it. But men are guilty of the exact same thing. For about fifty years longer than women.


Which only goes to prove my point. Males are not less susceptible to corruption than females. Not in dogs or chickens or gophers or humans. Since selection of male behavioral trait is more rapid than that of females’, you could make the argument that males are more susceptible. The natural greater disparity in male reproductive success suggests this. The best model for reproduction must be a balance of power between males and females because it is self sustaining. The “suffering” must be distributed evenly. Otherwise you are agreeing to exploit women in an unfair way, which means that white men will be selected for exploitive traits. Parasitism.

Why are jews awful? Why are muslims awful? Exploitive, manipulative traits. Caused by a lack of merit based selection. Thats what you want. A lack of merit based selection. Exploitation of your own race. But it wont end there. White men will racemix as they have done before when they had the opportunity- african americans. Latinos too if the iberians count as white.

Men are as corruptible as women when they have the opportunity. Women have more economic power now so they are being corrupt. But it goes both ways. Guys like you will obviously be as tyrannical and vindictive as feminists are being right now. You think all their arguments about historical male abuses is foundless? Its not.

There must be a contract between the men and women of a society. There must be monagamy. There can be not swapping spouses midstream. Men must provide economic stability. Women must provide and raise children. After a little bit of catchup in the birthrate, you could require women to marry and give birth to 2 kids by 30 to achieve certain civil privileges like voting. Men would also have to earn their civic privileges. Once we eliminate most of the worthless bureacratic jobs from the economy —which are created by usury, monopolies and socialist government programs— women will not be so flush. A merit based economy will reduce women’s economic success to what it really should be. From whatever of their earnings are left, you can take any of the social spending sort of shit that women want to pay for. I.e., if women want to vote for more spending on social housing or food stamps for unmarried women with kids or better prisons, it can be taken out of the paychecks of women garment workers or women nurses.

Men are more economically productive. That is why it is so tyrannical for women to vote on taxation or deficit spending for their pet projects. They don’t earn it.

You don’t have to be a slaver ffs. You just have to impose fairness. Im not talking about pay equality or any of that shit. I mean both women and men must be liable and accountable for their own choices. That prevents people from developing traits for exploitation.


You are just reaching here. I assume you are a christian . Jesus freely associated with women and didn’t say they should be enslaved and made to suffer did he? You should be willing to suffer as much as women for the future of our race. Its totally dishonest to propose that kidnapping and raping women and making them suffer is somehow consistent with christianity. Thats what the quran is for.

Again you are assuming that everyone who got the vax is a pink haired, open borders Woketard.

Many anti lockdown protesters were vaxxed themselves, for instance.

Stop making everything black-and-white.