So you're suggesting that not only did they create a studio sized vacuum chamber but also they managed to selectively slow down the decent of the dust while leaving the speed and acceleration of the vehicle the same. Using 1960s video editing techniques. Dude. Seriously?
It most certainly is. The wheels kick it up and then it falls right back down. Get in a car and drive down a dirt/gravel road on earth and you'll see that the dust gets picked up by wind and billows. It forms dust clouds on earth. Not on the moon. Also, once again, how do you explain the fact that it falls at a slow rate that matches up with the calculated acceleration due to gravity on the moon? The only way they could pull that off would be slowing the footage down, but the vehicle travel speed would then obviously be slowed down, except that it isn't. So they would've somehow had to have selectively slowed down the dust but not the vehicle. Which just wouldn't be possible in the 1960s.
Get in a car and drive down a dirt/gravel road on earth and you'll see that the dust gets picked up by wind and billows. It forms dust clouds on earth. Not on the moon.
There is no wind on the moon and no wind in studio.
The only way they could pull that off would be slowing the footage down
The whole video looks to have the speed modified, either sped up or slowed down IMO.
The wheels kick it up and then it falls right back down.
Even without wind, there is an atmosphere which will cause billowing on earth. Like I said, you have to be making the assumption they made an entire vacuum chamber studio and selectively slowed down the footage on only the dust.
[ - ] zongongo 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:23:25 ago (+1/-0)
The soil could have easily been oiled to keep down dust. \r\n I used to drive a water truck in a granite quarry. \r\n If you don\'t want dust, it can be controlled. \r\n Surprised that NASA would be smart enough. \r\n See the Apollo 11 press conference !\r\n Boy, those guys sure seem like men who have just accomplished something unprecedented !!\r\n No they appear ashamed and embarrassed. \r\n
[ - ] zongongo 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:10:02 ago (+2/-1)*
You're absolutely retarded if you believe this geek. NASA was so lame in their phony production, they slowed their footage by exactly half as if they never thought their fraud would be scrutinized. By half , how dumb and easy is that. You can find footage of the moon buggy sped up by 50% on youtube. The dirt appears to fall as it does when I do a rooster tail with the dirt bike , like normal earth gravity. Anyone who would believe a geek like this is retarded. No, I didn't watch the whole thing, you can sense the bs if you have the power level.
The evil space Jew penguins just changed your personal sky box to make you think you were actually seeing it. Smh. I don't know how you could be fooled so easily.
I hope you liked the video (if you watched it). It uses a lot of great arguments that I haven't heard used before.
The soil could have easily been oiled to keep down dust. \r\n I used to drive a water truck in a granite quarry. \r\n If you don\'t want dust, it can be controlled. \r\n Surprised that NASA would be smart enough. \r\n See the Apollo 11 press conference !\r\n Boy, those guys sure seem like men who have just accomplished something unprecedented !!\r\n No they appear ashamed and embarrassed. \r\n
You aren't very familiar with the moon landing conspiracy if you're using that argument. Any moon landing conspiracy believer will tell you that Russia and the US were working together the entire time.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:13:49 ago (+2/-0)
The dust angle is not cutting it.
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:18:14 ago (+0/-1)
Dude. Seriously?
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:21:22 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:24:36 ago (+0/-0)
Also, once again, how do you explain the fact that it falls at a slow rate that matches up with the calculated acceleration due to gravity on the moon? The only way they could pull that off would be slowing the footage down, but the vehicle travel speed would then obviously be slowed down, except that it isn't. So they would've somehow had to have selectively slowed down the dust but not the vehicle.
Which just wouldn't be possible in the 1960s.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:34:06 ago (+0/-0)
There is no wind on the moon and no wind in studio.
The whole video looks to have the speed modified, either sped up or slowed down IMO.
Regolith, the Earth has some too.
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:35:13 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:23:25 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:36:33 ago (+0/-0)
Assumption
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:10:02 ago (+2/-1)*
NASA was so lame in their phony production, they slowed their footage by exactly half as if they never thought their fraud would be scrutinized. By half , how dumb and easy is that.
You can find footage of the moon buggy sped up by 50% on youtube.
The dirt appears to fall as it does when I do a rooster tail with the dirt bike , like normal earth gravity.
Anyone who would believe a geek like this is retarded.
No, I didn't watch the whole thing, you can sense the bs if you have the power level.
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 14:44:06 ago (+1/-0)
I remember seeing it as a kid growing up. Hopefully it's still there!
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 3 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:00:26 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Her0n
[ - ] Her0n 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:59:36 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:06:11 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 14:48:03 ago (+0/-0)
I hope you liked the video (if you watched it). It uses a lot of great arguments that I haven't heard used before.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 14:12:21 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 14:34:42 ago (+1/-0)
Yeah ok fag
Even if your claim were true, it has nothing to do with any of the content or arguments presented in the video.
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:00:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:02:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] DukeofRaul
[ - ] DukeofRaul 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:31:35 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:38:47 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Breeder
[ - ] Breeder 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 13, 2022 00:14:00 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] lesbiantroll3
[ - ] lesbiantroll3 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 17:03:18 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:23:32 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:22:49 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:16:29 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] zongongo
[ - ] zongongo 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:13:44 ago (+0/-0)
https://youtu.be/g9aS38pCU88
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:48:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:53:34 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:43:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] throwawayaccount
[ - ] throwawayaccount [op] 0 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 15:47:06 ago (+0/-0)
xD
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 1 point 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 16:02:09 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] giantprick
[ - ] giantprick -1 points 1.8 yearsJul 12, 2022 13:51:26 ago (+0/-1)