Yeah, that's my thought as well. The whole thing just felt so pompous especially given that, topically, this bit is stating almost the same things as his UofT campus recordings that made him famous for the bill C16 debate. He was doing the same grandstanding at that point too. That should raise the question: why ought anyone be surprised by it this time? It was a problem in 2017 at a liberal-owned institution. Should we be surprised it is a problem on a liberally-owned media platform in 2022? Of course not, because nobody has done a damn thing except continue to talk on those very platforms about how bad those platforms are. What new material or problem is being covered here that wasn't already raised in his C-16 battle several years ago?
And yet here he is 'drama-fagging' this speech like it is some new call to arms that he wasn't also drama-fagging on campus back then.
Combined with the even more dramatic advert for Jordan's joining (((Daily Wire))), even if his sentiments are sincere here (which I think they probably are), he's not advancing the dialogue meaningfully. He continues to just state the problem more eloquently and dramatically than other people in order to build up a pseudo-religious following. The move to Daily Wire is quite confusing I think, unless we view it as simple commercial opportunism. Things he had made available to his audience for free will now all feature behind a paywall, moreover on a news site for conservative 'Judeo-Christian' grifters. I like Walsh, but at this point in the game, if nobody on your crew is Jew-naming, you're quickly becoming irrelevant.
I noticed Jordan had a little spike in popularity during the Canadian trucker protest too, in which he got fired up ideologically only to ultimately give a milquetoast treatment on the practical side. There is a huge asymmetry in Jordan's rhetoric between 'the stakes' side of things, versus the 'you should do this' side of things. Anybody with a mouth can run off about the stakes and wax poetically.
If I have to hear one more of these intellectuals talk about how the 'conversation' needs to go, or how it needs to change, my head will explode. As if you can just cuss a few times on a Youtube monologue in your $3,000 suit and suddenly the Jew world order is going to stop in its tracks. Conservatives have been shouting they're 'angry as hell' for decades. But nobody making money on the talking side of things likes to broach the reality of violence, because that will almost certainly put a halt to their online money-making. So keep talking.
Most of you simple-minded moral-fags don't understand: it's propaganda. Not for you, but for the normies - and it's at least partially effective in that regard. If you think every message has to be tuned to you and your concerns, then you yourselves are nothing more than programmed useless NPC normies - just of a different brand, and with different masters. YOU are the controlled opposition - don't you fucking faggots see that????
[ - ] canbot 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:31:37 ago (+1/-0)
As he explains in his reply, it is not dead naming because Elen was still Elen when she had her breasts removed.
He points out how there is no winning. The rules are illogical.
This post is slander and most of the comments right now are shills. JP is one of the most articulate, credible and important people speaking truth to power. He is being slandered here to prevent him from gaining any more popularity on the right because that popularity has so far overpowered the jews ability to cancel him.
Even if you don't like him you should support him, spread his message, and repost the things you agree with. It would be a huge improvement over the garbage you already spread that the jew shills here don't even bother attacking.
Another libtard that celebrates twatter banning people they want to be censored, but then complains loudly - and longly LOL - when it is his turn.
The ship has sailed for anyone complaining on any social media platform - this should have been done as a collective the moment the first person was banned anywhere.
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:13:34 ago (+2/-1)
For all of his shortcomings, the man has never encouraged censorship. In fact his entire modus operandi has been to defend absolute freedom of speech starting with people pursuing obnoxious infinite Marxist gendered terms.
If you want to trash JP for failing to keep his house in order be my guest, but don't be disingenuous in your criticism.
For all of his shortcomings, the man has never encouraged censorship.
He wanted to put white nationalists "in a box" so they could be ignored. He was handed enormous sums of money, and I believe it was after Sargon got banned from Patreon, there was going to be this big push to get a free speech platform. What came out of it? Nothing. Dave Rubin attached himself to the issue, and eventually he came up with "Locals", a limited hangout platform by invitation only.
Granted, at least one of the other panelists there is a kike that probably pushed for this, but still, if he was truly a principled man he wouldn't have attended it after they decided to ban her.
She was working for rebel until levant got all buttblasted about her talking to the daily stormer and fired her right away. She's called out the jew at least once since then. She's pretty much disappeared off the internet though after she got married a few years ago.
As for her being a jew, it is possible as she claims she's Greek and Ukrainian, both countries that have a sizable portion of yids. But she does seem to be Catholic so I dunno what her deal really is.
True, I haven't followed any of the retarded social media drama, but in my readings here at tlol and old voat, I only recall a handful of people voicing severe opposition to any bans.
Yes, JP has been outspoken on censorship - but where was the outcry at banning the sitting president???
Oh yeah, he was annoying, and deserved to be banned, right?
They are all hypocrites, and I have zero sympathy for any of them. Suddenly he has a huge problem with twatter because he is the one being banned? Where was his video in regards to trump?
If he is for "absolute freedom of speech" shouldn't he have used his platform to rally around trump? The silence tells me all I need to know about all these libtarded hypocrites.
[ + ] ModernGuilt
[ - ] ModernGuilt 9 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 10:01:20 ago (+9/-0)
[ + ] CHIRO
[ - ] CHIRO 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:04:39 ago (+2/-0)*
And yet here he is 'drama-fagging' this speech like it is some new call to arms that he wasn't also drama-fagging on campus back then.
Combined with the even more dramatic advert for Jordan's joining (((Daily Wire))), even if his sentiments are sincere here (which I think they probably are), he's not advancing the dialogue meaningfully. He continues to just state the problem more eloquently and dramatically than other people in order to build up a pseudo-religious following. The move to Daily Wire is quite confusing I think, unless we view it as simple commercial opportunism. Things he had made available to his audience for free will now all feature behind a paywall, moreover on a news site for conservative 'Judeo-Christian' grifters. I like Walsh, but at this point in the game, if nobody on your crew is Jew-naming, you're quickly becoming irrelevant.
I noticed Jordan had a little spike in popularity during the Canadian trucker protest too, in which he got fired up ideologically only to ultimately give a milquetoast treatment on the practical side. There is a huge asymmetry in Jordan's rhetoric between 'the stakes' side of things, versus the 'you should do this' side of things. Anybody with a mouth can run off about the stakes and wax poetically.
If I have to hear one more of these intellectuals talk about how the 'conversation' needs to go, or how it needs to change, my head will explode. As if you can just cuss a few times on a Youtube monologue in your $3,000 suit and suddenly the Jew world order is going to stop in its tracks. Conservatives have been shouting they're 'angry as hell' for decades. But nobody making money on the talking side of things likes to broach the reality of violence, because that will almost certainly put a halt to their online money-making. So keep talking.
[ + ] Thyhorrorcosmic103
[ - ] Thyhorrorcosmic103 7 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 08:18:35 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] didyouknow
[ - ] didyouknow 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:39:38 ago (+1/-0)
https://files.catbox.moe/1eglnu.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/kzofkk.png
[ + ] Trumpman1488
[ - ] Trumpman1488 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 13:39:26 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] i_hate_sodomites
[ - ] i_hate_sodomites 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 5, 2022 03:37:52 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 5, 2022 06:44:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:31:37 ago (+1/-0)
He points out how there is no winning. The rules are illogical.
This post is slander and most of the comments right now are shills. JP is one of the most articulate, credible and important people speaking truth to power. He is being slandered here to prevent him from gaining any more popularity on the right because that popularity has so far overpowered the jews ability to cancel him.
Even if you don't like him you should support him, spread his message, and repost the things you agree with. It would be a huge improvement over the garbage you already spread that the jew shills here don't even bother attacking.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:42:18 ago (+1/-0)
Its an unedited clip JP posted up himself over the Twitter suspension which will remain in perpetuity as he won't apologise.
That's what I am doing.
I beg your pardon.
[ + ] PotatoWhisperer
[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 14:31:48 ago (+1/-0)
By design. The only way to win is to not play ((their)) game.
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal -1 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:02:38 ago (+1/-2)
Another libtard that celebrates twatter banning people they want to be censored, but then complains loudly - and longly LOL - when it is his turn.
The ship has sailed for anyone complaining on any social media platform - this should have been done as a collective the moment the first person was banned anywhere.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:13:34 ago (+2/-1)
If you want to trash JP for failing to keep his house in order be my guest, but don't be disingenuous in your criticism.
[ + ] chrimony
[ - ] chrimony 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:55:52 ago (+2/-0)
He wanted to put white nationalists "in a box" so they could be ignored. He was handed enormous sums of money, and I believe it was after Sargon got banned from Patreon, there was going to be this big push to get a free speech platform. What came out of it? Nothing. Dave Rubin attached himself to the issue, and eventually he came up with "Locals", a limited hangout platform by invitation only.
[ + ] HeyJames
[ - ] HeyJames 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 13:39:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] oyy_veyy_goyy
[ - ] oyy_veyy_goyy 1 point 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 12:31:21 ago (+1/-0)
Him and other panelists banned Faith Goldy from attending a free speech event some odd years back: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=a8zLcMGCedA
Granted, at least one of the other panelists there is a kike that probably pushed for this, but still, if he was truly a principled man he wouldn't have attended it after they decided to ban her.
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 12:34:38 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] oyy_veyy_goyy
[ - ] oyy_veyy_goyy 2 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 13:21:38 ago (+2/-0)*
As for her being a jew, it is possible as she claims she's Greek and Ukrainian, both countries that have a sizable portion of yids. But she does seem to be Catholic so I dunno what her deal really is.
EDIT found her tweet calling them out: https://archive.ph/RG493
Another archived link of it, this time with loads of hebraic kvetching: https://archive.ph/MAaC5
[ + ] Trumpman1488
[ - ] Trumpman1488 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 13:49:45 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] localsal
[ - ] localsal 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:36:17 ago (+0/-0)
Yes, JP has been outspoken on censorship - but where was the outcry at banning the sitting president???
Oh yeah, he was annoying, and deserved to be banned, right?
They are all hypocrites, and I have zero sympathy for any of them. Suddenly he has a huge problem with twatter because he is the one being banned? Where was his video in regards to trump?
If he is for "absolute freedom of speech" shouldn't he have used his platform to rally around trump? The silence tells me all I need to know about all these libtarded hypocrites.
[ + ] canbot
[ - ] canbot 0 points 1.9 yearsJul 4, 2022 11:25:34 ago (+0/-0)