[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 06:45:29 ago (+1/-0)
Human-beings have difficulty getting along generally - it's the nature of the beast. Throw in racial and cultural differences and ... you might as well give up on the idea of a peaceful Society.
Human-beings have difficulty getting along generally - it's the nature of the beast
a) NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced] aka the generator (dying) for each reactor (living) within.
b) the beast system (pyramid scheme of society; chain of command; mainstream narrative; party-line; Ouroboros etc.) represents the consequences of ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction).
c) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...that's what each ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable) represents...an ANIMAL (animated) HUMAN (form) aka form (life) animated by flow (inception towards death) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
d)the issue with getting along represents the ignorance of being resistance (living) within velocity (dying). Living isn't about getting along within dying; it's about the struggle to sustain self while being moved towards death. Others represent perceivable inspiration for adaptation; which one requires to sustain self. The concept of others represents the self differentiation of ALL (perceivable) into each ONE (perceiving) aka from flow to form; from balance to choice; from ongoing to temporary; from velocity to resistance; from potentiality to potential; from electric to magnetic; from loss to growth.
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 06:36:46 ago (+1/-0)
Let's take one nation completely divided and turn it into 3 nations completely divided. Fucking brilliant.
I got a better idea, and one that's actually in the process and offers actual potential. Return power back to the states. Then, you have 50 nations that are divided, but less so, and those that find their state untenable, can move. SCOTUS struck down RvW and returned that political hotcake to the states to argue. This is the solution. Less federalist power, more states rights.
And guess what? It's actually not sedition to call for it. Unlike Dick West's idea, which is actually seditious.
A perceivable nation represents "a people". The suggested "nations" represents a rhetorical umbrella that tempts all the people to consent by free will of choice to the suggested brand "nation" by the free will of choice of others aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which represents the inversion of perceivable natural law (perceivable to perceiving).
The only state within ALL perceivable reality represents ONEself...unless ignored for the suggested states by other ones. No nation is controlled by its people, because the many consent to the few suggesting them what "nation" means. The foundation for this trick represents the suggested word (fiction) over the perceivable sound (reality) aka spell-craft; hence the few crafting the spelling of the many by means of suggestion.
Put down the bong, libertarian. Without a "nation" the guy who can muster the most force wins. The sole and only legitimate purpose of government is to secure the rights of the people under rule of law.
I'm neither under the influence of suggested drugs; nor did I consent to suggested libertarianism. I represent "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
Without a "nation" the guy who can muster the most force wins
a) Nation represents "a people". A guy implies a people.
b) temporary living within the ongoing process of dying aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being the force of resistance (living) within the force of velocity (dying). The parasitic few mimic force of velocity (threads of death) to tempt the many to ignore being the force of resistance, and the more the many ignore utilizing resistance, the less they grow it.
The sole and only legitimate purpose of government is to secure the rights of the people under rule of law.
a) SOLE, noun [Latin solea, solum; that which sets] aka flow (dying) setting form (living).
b) ONLY, adjective - "single; one along" represents being ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable) aka one form along (lengthwise aka inception towards death) all flow.
c)GOVERN (to control) MENT (Latin mens; mind; memory)...memory can be controlled by others by means of suggested information; which tempts one to ignore utilizing memory within perceivable inspiration. In other words...memory needs to be used for adaptation to perceivable inspiration (like a ram); while resisting the temptation to be misused for accumulation of suggested information (like a hard-drive). The more you fill up the hard-drive; the slower your ram will be, and the less one can handle (comprehend) the input (perceivable).
Question impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss)?
d) RIGHT, adjective [Latin rectus, rego] - "to strain, stretch, straight"...growing life; while being moved from inception towards death sounds like a stretch; doesn't it?
e)question being the response-ability (choice) within the momentum (balance) of the natural order (inception towards death aka forwards motion)?
Choice needs to respond to perceivable balance; while resisting the temptation of suggested choices aka need (perceivable) over want (suggested). If each of the many ignores to respond as choice to perceivable; then the few who make the suggestions brepresent the "chosen ones" aka the elite (selection; choice).
Consent represents want (agreement) or not want (disagreement)suggested information; which both ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration (response-ability). When you write "I don't", then that implies not wanting suggested.
Choice exists at the center of perceivable balance (need/want); while being tempted with suggested imbalance (want vs not want). Whenever you find yourself disagreeing with others or using no; not; don't; nothing; nothingness etc. to defend your view, than you ignore need aka perceivable (everything). Nothing represents a suggestion by the few to tempt the many to ignore everything perceivable.
As for work...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". That internal power represents loss/growth balance, with us representing temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying).
That's bullshit and you know it. FL is barely 50% white. We're chock full of niggers and spics. Crawl out of your backwater swamp sometime and you'll quickly see that. To make matters worse, I've never seen so much race mixing as I have in FL.
"United" States; from Latin unitas - "the state of being one; oneness". The whole already differentiated itself into partial, hence us representing ONEs (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable).
The parasitic few suggest the many to further divide oneself by ignoring the whole. Instead of partitioning within the suggested "Unites States of America" corporation; why not be the U (unitas; one) S (state) within A (all)?
[ + ] FloridaMan
[ - ] FloridaMan 2 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 09:38:01 ago (+2/-0)
Time for the states to stand up and exercise the powers grabted to them. Fuck giving up land to the leftists.
[ + ] RecycledElectrons
[ - ] RecycledElectrons 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 14:31:33 ago (+1/-0)
Segregation tomorrow!
Segregation forever!
[ + ] paul_neri
[ - ] paul_neri 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 06:45:29 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -3 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 07:04:58 ago (+0/-3)
a) NATURE, noun [Latin from nature born, produced] aka the generator (dying) for each reactor (living) within.
b) the beast system (pyramid scheme of society; chain of command; mainstream narrative; party-line; Ouroboros etc.) represents the consequences of ignoring perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction).
c) HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] + AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.]...that's what each ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable) represents...an ANIMAL (animated) HUMAN (form) aka form (life) animated by flow (inception towards death) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
d)the issue with getting along represents the ignorance of being resistance (living) within velocity (dying). Living isn't about getting along within dying; it's about the struggle to sustain self while being moved towards death. Others represent perceivable inspiration for adaptation; which one requires to sustain self. The concept of others represents the self differentiation of ALL (perceivable) into each ONE (perceiving) aka from flow to form; from balance to choice; from ongoing to temporary; from velocity to resistance; from potentiality to potential; from electric to magnetic; from loss to growth.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 06:36:46 ago (+1/-0)
I got a better idea, and one that's actually in the process and offers actual potential. Return power back to the states. Then, you have 50 nations that are divided, but less so, and those that find their state untenable, can move. SCOTUS struck down RvW and returned that political hotcake to the states to argue. This is the solution. Less federalist power, more states rights.
And guess what? It's actually not sedition to call for it. Unlike Dick West's idea, which is actually seditious.
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -3 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 07:10:53 ago (+0/-3)
A perceivable nation represents "a people". The suggested "nations" represents a rhetorical umbrella that tempts all the people to consent by free will of choice to the suggested brand "nation" by the free will of choice of others aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which represents the inversion of perceivable natural law (perceivable to perceiving).
The only state within ALL perceivable reality represents ONEself...unless ignored for the suggested states by other ones. No nation is controlled by its people, because the many consent to the few suggesting them what "nation" means. The foundation for this trick represents the suggested word (fiction) over the perceivable sound (reality) aka spell-craft; hence the few crafting the spelling of the many by means of suggestion.
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 4 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 07:20:34 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -3 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 10:02:06 ago (+0/-3)
I'm neither under the influence of suggested drugs; nor did I consent to suggested libertarianism. I represent "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
a) Nation represents "a people". A guy implies a people.
b) temporary living within the ongoing process of dying aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being the force of resistance (living) within the force of velocity (dying). The parasitic few mimic force of velocity (threads of death) to tempt the many to ignore being the force of resistance, and the more the many ignore utilizing resistance, the less they grow it.
a) SOLE, noun [Latin solea, solum; that which sets] aka flow (dying) setting form (living).
b) ONLY, adjective - "single; one along" represents being ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable) aka one form along (lengthwise aka inception towards death) all flow.
c)GOVERN (to control) MENT (Latin mens; mind; memory)...memory can be controlled by others by means of suggested information; which tempts one to ignore utilizing memory within perceivable inspiration. In other words...memory needs to be used for adaptation to perceivable inspiration (like a ram); while resisting the temptation to be misused for accumulation of suggested information (like a hard-drive). The more you fill up the hard-drive; the slower your ram will be, and the less one can handle (comprehend) the input (perceivable).
Question impression (perceivable) to compression (comprehension) for either expression (growth) or repression (loss)?
d) RIGHT, adjective [Latin rectus, rego] - "to strain, stretch, straight"...growing life; while being moved from inception towards death sounds like a stretch; doesn't it?
e)question being the response-ability (choice) within the momentum (balance) of the natural order (inception towards death aka forwards motion)?
Choice needs to respond to perceivable balance; while resisting the temptation of suggested choices aka need (perceivable) over want (suggested). If each of the many ignores to respond as choice to perceivable; then the few who make the suggestions brepresent the "chosen ones" aka the elite (selection; choice).
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 2 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 10:26:26 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -3 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 10:37:55 ago (+0/-3)
Choice exists at the center of perceivable balance (need/want); while being tempted with suggested imbalance (want vs not want). Whenever you find yourself disagreeing with others or using no; not; don't; nothing; nothingness etc. to defend your view, than you ignore need aka perceivable (everything). Nothing represents a suggestion by the few to tempt the many to ignore everything perceivable.
As for work...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". That internal power represents loss/growth balance, with us representing temporary growth (living) within ongoing loss (dying).
[ + ] FreeinTX
[ - ] FreeinTX 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 10:47:37 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Spaceman84
[ - ] Spaceman84 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 09:38:56 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 1 point 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 14:02:27 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] IfuckedYerMum
[ - ] IfuckedYerMum 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 16:50:19 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Anus_Expander
[ - ] Anus_Expander 0 points 2.8 yearsJun 30, 2022 15:43:09 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] ImplicationOverReason
[ - ] ImplicationOverReason -3 points 2.8 yearsJun 29, 2022 06:55:31 ago (+0/-3)
The parasitic few suggest the many to further divide oneself by ignoring the whole. Instead of partitioning within the suggested "Unites States of America" corporation; why not be the U (unitas; one) S (state) within A (all)?