Sign into an existing account

"Best" and "great" are subjective measures, but the US has been declining in quality of health care for years as perceived by those receiving it.

https://www.qwant.com/?q=US+medical+care+global+rankings&client=opensearch&t=web

Ultra MAGA Great!

Keep believing that bullshit.

All girls aren’t but I know what you mean. There seems to be less of a taboo among females being dykes. Is this because an arrangement of one husband and two or more wives is common historically and seems to “work” better than the opposite case of polyandry? Maybe. It might be advantageous under certain conditions for females to accept another female in the bedroom.

But it’s hard to see a reason why it would be advantageous for a heterosexual male to accept another male in the bedroom under similar circumstances. Heterosexual males are pretty much programmed to murder each other if they are competing for the same woman, not jerk each other off. The trade offs for males and females in sex are totally different.

In more primitive societies, females will tend to get impregnated no matter what, because males have very high libidos and will commit a lot of rape. So perhaps it matters less if females are “correctly oriented” especially in matrilineal societies where women tend to rely on their brothers and uncles for male tasks like hunting and protection. But males in such societies must succeed reproductively by fucking as many women as possible. Only males who are highly exclusive to females would succeed. Right? This is my speculation anyway.

Im very confident that gay is usually caused by a pathological condition that is physiological in nature. And like I said, this abnormality could be caused by different things. The same disease factors can occur in animals. They always point to domsetic sheep studies. But that is not a natural environment for sheep. There would be more infections in livestock and more “unfit” animals would be reproducing.

Gay is not efficient. With the exception of eusocial organisms, animals do not raise babies that are incapable of reproducing on purpose— that is an evolutionary fail. Gay is reproductively defective. So you have to ask why it is worth it for an animal to invest in reproductively defective offspring. This is evolution and evolution loves efficiency. Disease and pathology happens in animals just as in humans. We can’t assume that gay swans are evidence that gay is normal or useful. I’m not saying this proves we should throw them off a building. But we would not celebrate being a cripple or a deaf person or a schizophrenic— its a defect.

Gregory Cochran argues that zombie like behaviors seen in some parasitic diseases like toxoplasmosis could be driving homosexuality. He favored parasites and fungi as more likely candidates. Interestingly the massospora seems to fit his prediction. Massospora infects some male cicadas that begin to act like females and create female mating songs and entice males to “copulate” with them. The gay sex seems to help spread massospora. The fungus also releases a psychotropic substance that makes the bug hyperactive and very promiscuous, similar to caffeine maybe. To me, I couldn’t help but make the comparison to promiscuous “party” gays.

Then I read about another fungus called fusarium. Fusarium is a genus and some species infect grains and some species infect animals. It is known that fusarium produces high amounts of phyto-estrogens and that feeding fusarium infected grains to animals can make them “gay”. Fusarium infection in animals tend to be seen in sheep. Apparently its a big problem for sheep farmers, as is gay sheep, as we know. Is this just a coincidence? I haven’t seen a study trying to correlate the two. Fusarium infections tend to crop up in one group of people— HIV positve patients.

Anyway Ive lots to say on this topic but I don’t want to bore.

I think that many people are born faggots and there is a physical cause in the brain. But there may be some people that could go one way or another under certain conditions. Also I think it might be literally contagious due to an infection which probably has to happen early in life.

I think with men its more likely to be a cut and dry neurological condition. But with women there may be a greater degree of sexual flexibility that is innate and makes the average female more receptive to being “converted”. Maybe pre-pubescent boys are also more susceptible in this way. One thing I know is that once a guy gets to 18 or so and identifies as straight he rarely converts. But some women seem to convert at much later ages to being a dyke.