☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
28

Politicians must participate in wars they start

submitted by Conspirologist to TellTalk 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 06:50:15 ago (+30/-2)     (TellTalk)

Politicians must participate in wars they start by law. As soon as such a law will exist, these corrupted pieces of shit will think twice before starting a war.

Think about it.


26 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] TheYiddler 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 07:52:28 ago (+0/-0)

This is how it worked in feudalism. If the king or a prince wasn't on the battle field, the soldiers would rout at the first sign of trouble.

[ - ] herbert_west 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 08:41:11 ago (+0/-0)

No in wars they start, but in all wars they get the country involved in any way.

[ - ] knightwarrior41 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 09:01:55 ago (+0/-0)

i agree. i ancient times the king/ruler would lead his armies in to wars but that changed when they realized that the rabble should put all the weight for them

[ - ] Leveraction 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 13:09:08 ago (+0/-0)

Politicians MUST participate AND their families!

[ - ] Dafurius_Nigario 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 14:28:27 ago (+0/-0)

Sparta had two kings for that sole purpose.

One of them always had to follow into war.

Also Spartans never carried money with them, they were against them. They were only meant to work out while eilotes ran the economy.

[ - ] giantprick 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 17:32:00 ago (+0/-0)

I've been saying this for years!

[ - ] Ironcrusader88 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 18, 2022 00:07:44 ago (+0/-0)

This is one of the benefits of a warrior elite society. A class that fights for the future of the state is one that looks out for its best interests because they seek to survive. It’s one of the many reasons why ancient Sparta was renown for warfare in the ancient world

[ - ] KyleIsThisTall 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 18, 2022 01:55:09 ago (+0/-0)

I see you've never read All Quiet On The Western Front

[ - ] mikenigger 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 10:03:46 ago (+1/-0)

nobody cares what you have to say poalfag

[ - ] oldblo 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 07:56:14 ago (+1/-0)

Nah. They would just weasel their way around it or ignore it all together.
Much like USAs Bill of Rights.

[ - ] RedBarchetta 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 10:53:14 ago (+1/-0)

Participate? They are participating. They are the fucking Commander. You think they are in their office jerking off? They are with the other Generals and Admirals in the Rear with the Gear.

You want them on a horse leading the charge.

[ - ] Backwards 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 12:39:04 ago (+1/-0)

It would just lead to more proxy wars. Politicians are notorious for finding ways out of doing what's expected of them.

[ - ] Spaceman84 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 15:07:57 ago (+1/-0)

You're wasting your time posting this shit here. May as well demand they all be drug tested. It'll never happen.

[ - ] PearofAnguishJuniorManager 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 15:30:32 ago (+1/-0)

In the old days, when you went to war, the king was right down front eating shit with everyone else. Except for the English, they hung out in the back. But at least they were there.

Now they golf and wear goat head masks at their weird parties, while everyone else gets killed for the Jew.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 09:21:43 ago (+2/-0)

It is the same with everything though. If i shit in someone's yard then i go to jail, pay a fine, and clean it up. If a ceo dumps 100 ft3 in someone's yard they might have to pay cleanup or something, but at the very worst the company goes bankrupt and the ceo gets all of his earnings from bad actions and is rewarded with a severance package. We should see CEOs and their families losing their entire fortunes paying out settlements. The oxy case is a good example.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 10:25:52 ago (+2/-0)

Do away with governmentally protected monopolies and mega-corps. You will be responsible for your business, however big it gets. If one of your workers does something harmful, that one pays the fines and goes to jail. If it happens too often, you pay the fine and do the time.

[ - ] GoldenAgeWhen 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 12:30:45 ago (+0/-0)

Yes, shielding behind a company doesn't make any sense. Like a scumlord could have a house and know that there is something potentially harmful about it, not fix it, something bad happens, and since he has an llc the worst that could happen is he loses the property.

[ - ] PotatoWhisperer 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 14:08:17 ago (+1/-0)

Indeed. Instead of plausible deniability we need to adopt positive control. No more excuses.

[ - ] SirNiggsalot 4 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 07:00:16 ago (+4/-0)

If they're to old , their military age male family members must , if they have none , then a substantial portion of their assets are seized to support the conflict

[ - ] Her0n 7 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 09:23:35 ago (+7/-0)

I don't care if they're old, they're still going.

Just put them in a battalion of niggers and commence with operation "dark shield".

[ - ] SilentByAssociation 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 10:43:06 ago (+2/-0)

They'll do just fine as cannon fodder. It'll boost morale for the country.

[ - ] gaperglory 1 point 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 13:27:42 ago (+1/-0)

It's operation "get behind the darkies", young man.

[ - ] Her0n 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 13:54:34 ago (+0/-0)

I know, but that was created by jews and I try to stray away from anything jews have created on principal.

Besides, I like mine better.

[ - ] giantprick 2 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 17:31:50 ago (+2/-0)

If they're too old to be in war they're too old to lead. Easy as.

[ - ] FalseRealityCheck 7 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 08:14:58 ago (+7/-0)

It might be more effective to kill the politicians, as well as their families and friends.

Just sayin'....

[ - ] 2Drunk 0 points 2.9 yearsJun 17, 2022 17:16:29 ago (+0/-0)

I find no fault in your logic.