×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules
3
5 comments block


[ - ] Roy_Batty 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 11, 2022 12:40:48 ago (+0/-0)

Fuck off with the double posts.

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 11, 2022 15:00:03 ago (+0/-0)

Not a double post, dumb nigger

And you don't even submit anything. Double nigger.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 10, 2022 20:39:19 ago (+0/-0)

I read the part about the use of a graphite moderator and that doesn’t sit well with me. Graphite has a positive temperature coefficient of reactivity and that does not promote stability of reactor operation. For example, if power is increased then that will raise temperature. When the temperature of the graphite increases, that adds positive reactivity which raises power. Then temperature goes up and then power, etc. it’s incredibly easy to cause that reactor to “run away”. Most reactors use water as a moderator which has a negative temperature coefficient of reactivity. That means if power goes up, temperature will go up but when that happens reactivity will go down which will lower power. This keeps things stable and manageable even in an abnormal situation. Graphite moderators are bad. Chernobyl showed us how bad it can be.

Also, sodium cooled reactors aren’t all that safe. Have you seen what happens to sodium when it hits water? So let’s put that through tubes that go through a boiler to make steam and hope there isn’t a tube leak. Um, how about no?

[ - ] Spaceman84 [op] 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 10, 2022 21:36:59 ago (+0/-0)

Valid points, but these new designs are engineered with the intent to mitigate those risks. There is potential for a criticality accident but much lower than traditional reactors. If it were a significant risk, we'd have no fission reactors at all.

[ - ] MasklessTheGreat 0 points 1.9 yearsJun 10, 2022 23:03:59 ago (+0/-0)

You can always mitigate risks but at the end of the day a positive reactivity addition incident with a reactor designed with a positive reactivity coefficient is going to end up with a prompt critical reactor.

“Yeah, well we can just scram the reactor.” You can and that’s what they did at Chernobyl. You only have milliseconds to act and by the time you realize what’s going on you’ve already wasted that time.