Sign into an existing account

This feeds my confirmation bias that historians are a useless waste of money.

This is like the wet blankets who always point out that Vikings didn't wear horns on their helmets.
I'm like, "Dude, shut the fuck up! You are going to ruin the fun!"

Then I give him a wedgie as I rape and pillage his monastery while wearing my horned helmet.

Viking is a verb: "to go viking" - "to go raiding". In Norway we call these years the Viking Age and this guy can go fuck himself.
He is technically correct when he says there never existed a viking and that's because it is a term we use today do describe a group of norse people - militias, farmers, carpenters, fishermen - who gathered in raiding parties/viking parties. Today we call them Vikings even thought they never referred to themselves as Vikings.

I hope he necks himself.

*Viking is not just a verb, also a noun and so on. I just wanted to point it out since most people think of Viking as solely a referanse to a people and time period.

Alex Woolf of the University of St Andrews. That bought and owned education thief and parasite's name goes on the list.

Prostituting education should be a capital offence.

But pirates did sail vaguely similar ships, and wore similar clothes, raiding familiar targets in similar ways.

I'm sure he'll get to the point eventually in his 300-page thesis on why the word Viking makes him pissy.

The fag went on and on about not calling them ‘Vikings’, and never said what the proper name should be. Poorly written shite article.

I'd vike him right in his faggot face!