The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
An ID, if required, would have to be free of any charge. It doesn't matter that you need one anyway for a bank, welfare or to buy cigarettes.
Hell, we buy the niggers and wetbacks Obama Phones, pay for their housing AND feed them. What's an ID too?
You're doing the left's work for them with that interpretation. Very first sentence says this applies to citizens so you have to have a way to prove citizenship so you know who if this applies to the person attempting to vote.
The last sentence can easily be interpreted as not using voting rights erasure as a punative measure.
Read this way, it seems to imply that a voter id would almost be required to keep with the spirit of the law in a practical way.
Ahh, no. What I'm doing is reading the Constitution and yes, that sentence IS meant to not allow voting rights as a punitive measure.
Read this way, it seems to imply that a voter id would almost be required to keep with the spirit of the law in a practical way.
If that's how you want to read it, whatever. It doesn't change the fact that a poll tax cannot be issued to prevent a right.
We should follow the Constitution more and the Supreme Cunts less. It's not that hard to read and understand the Constitution. It does however take effort and cunning to circumvent it, something that the Supreme Cunts have become proficient at.
I have to show my ID to buy fucking beer, and I am obviously over the age of 21. ID? They should have to show they don't collect welfare, or on any government programs for that matter before they vote.
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 1 point 2.0 yearsMay 31, 2022 14:13:35 ago (+1/-0)
An ID, if required, would have to be free of any charge. It doesn't matter that you need one anyway for a bank, welfare or to buy cigarettes.
Hell, we buy the niggers and wetbacks Obama Phones, pay for their housing AND feed them. What's an ID too?
[ + ] SecretHitler
[ - ] SecretHitler 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 31, 2022 19:15:01 ago (+0/-0)
The last sentence can easily be interpreted as not using voting rights erasure as a punative measure.
Read this way, it seems to imply that a voter id would almost be required to keep with the spirit of the law in a practical way.
[ + ] RMGoetbbels
[ - ] RMGoetbbels 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 31, 2022 20:01:18 ago (+0/-0)
Ahh, no. What I'm doing is reading the Constitution and yes, that sentence IS meant to not allow voting rights as a punitive measure.
If that's how you want to read it, whatever. It doesn't change the fact that a poll tax cannot be issued to prevent a right.
We should follow the Constitution more and the Supreme Cunts less. It's not that hard to read and understand the Constitution. It does however take effort and cunning to circumvent it, something that the Supreme Cunts have become proficient at.
[ + ] Vrbllpollushin
[ - ] Vrbllpollushin 0 points 2.0 yearsMay 31, 2022 16:24:34 ago (+0/-0)