Sign into an existing account

The worst part of this gay post is the implication that being away from coding for less than a year makes you “out of date.” Because this queer actually believes that we can be certain he is working on nothing of value and the output is trash. If you want to build something of actual value and utility rather than some dogshit no one needs you can use languages that were written 40 years ago.

Women should stop imitating men.

Would have been based if he didn't suggest women becoming online prostitutes rather than wives.

Or vote

deleted

Women shouldn't code because they can't

They're awful at it.

Bullshit.

Women should code starting in 4th grade in a girls-only school. Boys are dumb as fuck until about grade 10. Girls are brilliant until grade 10. We should not mix fast-learning future mothers with slow-learning boys when women only have until grade 10 to learn. And women must learn, because a mother is by far the best teacher of her children. The boys have a lifetime of learning ahead of them. Women don't. Women can learn in 16 years what takes boys at least 25, but women only have these precious first 16 years to learn before hormones win to make them dumb and also fuckable. They have the capacity to be PhD level by 16. Young women mature faster than men because being a mother isn't something for the immature. Compare the responsibility and intelligence of a 5th grade girl to a 5th grade boy. The girl is way ahead. This is by design, but we fight nature instead. If women were trained properly, they could raise brilliant children and then enter the workforce at 40-45 drawing on old skill.

Ever wonder why some women can drive really well yet no woman can actually be taught to drive? How can this be? It's because some women actually learn to drive as pre-teens and younger and the skill sticks. This is true for almost all learning in women. Men, do not neglect your daughters. Your grandsons will thank you.

All women should have sex with me too

It is like anything, they like the "idea" of it, but don't realize that it is very taxing work that requires skills they likely don't have. It is a lot like engineering; women can do it, but only if it is routine work that can be easily learned and applied, and they hate it.

I listened to the response he posted to his YouTube channel, where he addresses the huge amount of flak he's gotten for posting this tweet. It's a very intelligent take, although it is a far cry from being 'red-pilled'. His position is mostly practical and economic: parenthood requires maternity planning, and this is contrary to optimum performance in the world of programming, and it leads to many problems. These include but are not limited to: inefficiencies in tech companies, increased stress and hardship for both parents and children, as well as a general breakdown in the usefulness of these categories when held separately (when parenting and employment are held separately in society).

I like the guy, and I like his style of rhetoric. I'd rather the argument that favors my position be made in a public-facing way, even if his reasons/theory are not equivalent to mine as an explanation for why the outcome should be favored.

At the same time, I think we do need to go beyond merely economic reasons for discouraging the female 'career mindset'.

I should be fairer to him though: he does address psychological features of this situation, i.e. the hardship women who want children endure when they try to balance these 'mutually exclusive' goals. But I'll read a bit into TechLead's thinking here. At one point he mentions that it is unavoidable for people in the context of the (brutal) tech field to interpret a male differently from a female in the same field. This is because people will always see the woman who is grinding her life away there as making a different kind of sacrifice than the male does; she sacrifices motherhood, and he does not.

So, the liberal can counter: "WHY shouldn't the actual/possible fathers in tech be seen as sacrificing this too!? They should feel the same kind of shame, since male and female parents are now viewed as equals in the game of parenting."

Well, they aren't viewed as equals in parenting, no matter how much lip service we pay to that idea. They never will be. This is because men are the sacrificial unit of society, and this is important, because it is not the result of men being held as superior. It is a direct result of recognizing that the inherent value of women and motherhood is the highest value in a society (a necessary condition for civilization itself).

Societies feature many signs that the sacrifice of fatherhood can be noble. Take the example of soldiers. This involves sacrificing the possibility of fatherhood (whether this means ability to have kids or to parent kids one already has), but we do not shame men for this. This is because we recognize his value as a sacrificial unit for the safety of the society as a whole.

We will never view women in the same way, because EVERYONE agreed implicitly as a species, at some point when civilization started to arise, that women and motherhood and their role in raising children was the MOST IMPORTANT fucking thing there is.

There is an extent to which a man faces the expectation, for some period of his life, that he will take the risk of sacrificing himself just for the 'rights' to be a father. We don't feel the same way about women. Instead, we see that her 'career driven-ness' is just plainly abrogating the most valuable thing/role in any society. She is forsaking what men have collectively sacrificed for, for eons.