SMITHSONIAN COVERUP - 1000's of Reports of Giant Skeletons Found - Upgoat

You don't believe the dozens of old news paper articles or early witness reports etc etc ??/
Or that there have been many credible stories of the smithsonian 'deliberately' loosing artifacts for over 100 years ??..

It's like saying the Medical Fraternity is completely and utterly honest.

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena -1 points 3 yearsMay 20, 2022 17:11:40 ago (+1/-2)

You don't believe the dozens of old news paper articles or early witness reports etc etc ??

Not necessarily, and certainly not when they claim King Arthur was a 15 ft giant.

Or that there have been many credible stories of the smithsonian 'deliberately' loosing artifacts for over 100 years ??..

Sure. It’s highly likely that the Smithsonian lost artifacts and/or colluded to surpress certain artifacts for political reasons—Including some skeletal remains with caucasoid traits dated to pre-columbian North America, which he mentioned but then conflated with a bunch of shit about giants.

Your reply is a strawman.

Do you believe King Arthur was from a race of giants? I find this to be preposterous. The guy only lived 15 or 16 hundred years ago. The Romans ruled Britain and never recorded any 15 ft people walking around.
Stories of giants came about when a bunch of 5 ft tall farmers were invaded be 6 ft tall barbarians. Hyperbole makes for good fireside storytelling.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 00:41:14 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 12:22:18 ago (+0/-0)

Romans did indeed record the jews and they recoreded the christians too which I imagine were significantly jewish.

[ + ] dassar

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 02:00:23 ago (+0/-0)

Smithsonian is in the US and I'm not talking bout king artur. So you're using a straw man to reply to my comment.
Plus i don't listen to click bait ytube grifter that talk shit ...

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 12:41:06 ago (+0/-0)

I was arguing about the truthfulness of this video, which is the point of the post, with kozel. If you are discussing a different point then its your obligation to clarify that.

Here is where I take issue with a claim in the video:

You think King Arthur was a 15 ft giant!?

Here is where you seem to be disputing my criticism (of the video)

You don't believe the dozens of old news paper articles or early witness reports etc etc ?? Or that there have been many credible stories of the smithsonian 'deliberately' loosing artifacts for over 100 years ??..It's like saying the Medical Fraternity is completely and utterly honest.

You seem to be saying that by questioning a claim in the video, I am endorsing the smithsonian as an honest institution.

Now you are telling me you weren’ t even discussing the video? It’s the point of the post! What the hell did you think I was talking about?

You’re not talking about King Arthur? You replied to a one sentence comment whose sole subject was King Arthur. Am I losing my mind?

I know where the smithsonian is- I’ve been there. What does that have to do with anything?

????

[ + ] dassar

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 20:10:17 ago (+0/-0)

No stop.
I said what i said and never mentioned king artur.
A person can use any bs video to discredit by association, exactly what you seem to be doing here, and i made specific remarks about the Smithsonian entirely separate from king artur bc you seem to infer that '(7-9 ft) giants' are impossible.

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 20:38:04 ago (+0/-0)

How can you say your initial reply to me had nothing to do with Arthur? The comment you replied to was only about king arthur! You are saying you replied to a comment about king arthur but you weren’t thinking about king arthur?

My initial comment was “basically bs”. I stand by that, because I watched a good chunk of the video, and that was my honest assesment. Of the video. Because the post was about the video.

...which apparently you didn’t watch and aren’t talking about. Do I have that right?

It’s as if you are having a conversation with some other person.

A person can use any bs video to discredit by association, exactly what you seem to be doing here,

Who do you think I’m trying to discredit? I’m not “using” the video to discredit anything, but the video!

Someone posted it and I watched some of it and found it to be 99% bullshit and 1% fact and that 1% was used to lend credibility to the 99% bullshit.

i made specific remarks about the Smithsonian

I specifically adressed your question on the smithsonian. Was I supposed to divine from that that you were having a totally different conversation in your head than the one I was having about the reliability of the video’s claims? Because that didn’t happen.

Honest to god, I still don’t even know what you are trying to argue. Watch the video for 5 or 10 minutes. That was what I was commenting on.

[ + ] dassar

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3 yearsMay 23, 2022 01:04:03 ago (+0/-0)

I was talking about the Smithsonian and 'giants' mentioned in early American newsprint history.
I made no mention of artur and repeatedly clarified that to you.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel 0 points 3 yearsMay 20, 2022 17:10:46 ago (+0/-0)

I've not considered or researched the matter. Why ask me about such a specific case?

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsMay 20, 2022 17:29:25 ago (+1/-1)

The name of the video is “ thousands of reports of giant skeletons found”

Does that give you a hint?

Do I need to bring up every retarded claim made in this video? I don’t really think this is a case of cherry picking. He is making claims of multiple skeletons anywhere from 15 to 36 ft high (Minute 23:50). He is using the bible as a source. He is conflating anachronistic clovis artifacts and elongated central american skulls with races of giants. This is a chaotic hoax from top to bottom.

How stupid do you have to be? Save it for the Qanon crowd.

[ + ] Kozel

[ - ] Kozel 1 point 3 yearsMay 20, 2022 18:04:35 ago (+2/-1)

No it doesn't make sense why you would ask me about whether a mythological character was a giant. For that matter if you had anything worthwhile to say you would say exactly that and not allude to hints or pretend that this video is the only matter on the subject. Regarding the insults written in your conclusion, am I to assume you base them on your own character and deliver them as a form of self projectional therapy?

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 13:13:31 ago (+0/-0)

Oh I see. King Arthur was not a mythical character. He was a Brythonic cheiftain within the crumbling roman empire who fought the invasion of the lowland germanic hoards into Britain. Probably in the 5th century. He spoke something like Welsh called Common Brythonic. Maybe he also spoke latin which would have been the main language in SE Britain after several centuries of Roman rule. His ancestors would have been recently christianized under the roman empire as there were many of the old religionists like merlin still around. Everything in the arthurian legends is not true, but arthur almost ceratainly existed.

For that matter if you had anything worthwhile to say you would say exactly that and not allude to hints or pretend that this video is the only matter on the subject.

Did you call me a sheeple? You did. I believe that leaves me a bit of latitude in terms of tone.

If you had anything worthwhile to say, why did you not elaborate on your thoughts instead of just calling me a sheeple? I have plenty to say on this video. What would you like to discuss?

and not allude to hints or pretend that this video is the only matter on the subject.

I don’t know what you are talking about.

[ + ] Deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 00:44:09 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ + ] PostWallHelena

[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 3 yearsMay 21, 2022 12:18:20 ago (+0/-0)

Your right, jews are hiding 36 ft skeletons. It probably helps them take control of the west bank.

Sign into an existing account

SMITHSONIAN COVERUP - 1000's of Reports of Giant Skeletons Found submitted by deleted to conspiracy 3 yearsMay 20, 2022 09:58:00 ago (+17/-1) (conspiracy)

SMITHSONIAN COVERUP - 1000's of Reports of Giant Skeletons Found
submitted by deleted to conspiracy 3 yearsMay 20, 2022 09:58:00 ago (+17/-1) (conspiracy)