Elon Musk Speculates That “Over 90%” of Twitter’s Daily Active Users Might Be Bots - Upgoat

Elon Musk Speculates That “Over 90%” of Twitter’s Daily Active Users Might Be Bots
submitted by obvious to MeanwhileOnTwitter 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 10:11:26 ago (+55/-0) (wccftech.com)
https://wccftech.com/elon-musk-speculates-that-over-90-of-twitters-daily-active-users-might-be-bots-gets-a-call-from-twitter-legal-team-for-violating-the-nda/

Twitter is fake and gay!

35 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] TheYiddler 22 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 11:23:18 ago (+23/-1)

Crypto wasn't driving up GPU prices. State actors are buying GPUs to run gpt-3 and other ai bots.

[ + ] canbot

[ - ] canbot 10 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 14:12:36 ago (+10/-0)

Interesting theory. I bet at least a few crypto farms are actually a cover for spook operations.

[ + ] Trumpman1488

[ - ] Trumpman1488 -2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 14:01:30 ago (+0/-2)

For realz?

[ - ] we_kill_creativity 14 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 11:22:13 ago (+14/-0)

Of course it is. This is how they control our perception of what 'everyone' thinks. Then a certain percentage of normies actually do go along with it and everyone says, "well i know some people in real life who do it!". We all do. We dont literally live in a computer program, but it feels like it because we livd in a society run by a computer program, and these bots are how the programming integrates with us.

[ + ] Blackpowerwhitepowder

[ - ] Blackpowerwhitepowder 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 13:07:08 ago (+1/-0)

The interest feels completely flaw compared to when I was a kid clicking away on my desktop in my garage. Almost like one of those fake western towns where the look is all on the front facing side. Then you walk in and it’s a 711

[ + ] diggernicks

[ - ] diggernicks -11 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 11:28:59 ago (+1/-12)

You nigs get mega ass blasted whenever anyone on voat doesn't parrot the party line

The irony is incredible lol

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy -7 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 12:49:18 ago (+2/-9)

No kidding. Voat is a hivemind just like reddit.

[ + ] Whatthefuck

[ - ] Whatthefuck 5 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 19:28:57 ago (+5/-0)

With the obvious difference that you haven't been banned for opposing the hive. Meaning, if there is a majority view, it came about in an atmosphere where you could speak freely.

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 20:01:47 ago (+2/-0)

Stating voat is a hivemind is a comment on it's users, not the site itself.

[ + ] Swej_Ehtsag

[ - ] Swej_Ehtsag 1 point 3 yearsMay 17, 2022 01:16:32 ago (+1/-0)

I've been permanently banned from reddit, poal and 4chan. All of my posts on youtube are instantly deleted, fucking cocksuckers. I'm not on voat/talk whatever because I enjoy the hivemind, I'm here because everywhere has banned me because they either don't like free thinkers or they are all run by glowniggers who don't like what I have to say.

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 3 yearsMay 17, 2022 01:57:27 ago (+0/-0)

Couldn't be less relevant to my point.

[ + ] Swej_Ehtsag

[ - ] Swej_Ehtsag 1 point 3 yearsMay 17, 2022 10:04:00 ago (+1/-0)

It's completely relevant to your point. You say everyone here is mindless follow the leader groupthink NPC's and it's impossible to find a counterpoint here. If people here were easily manipulated by upvoats and golden banana stickers then why would any of us have ever left reddit or not simply be using twitter? If people here really cared about that shit, they could go to reddit and post, "all white man bad" and get a million upvoats and fake internet points within an hour. The only reason people are here is because they aren't susceptible to groupthink. Have you ever considered that the reason a bunch of people agree upon something isn't because they seek ingroup popularity but because the thing they agree on is the correct thing?

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 0 points 3 yearsMay 17, 2022 11:39:29 ago (+0/-0)

People here aren't susceptible to groupthink? That's laughable. Just because it isn't leftist groupthink doesn't mean it's not groupthink.

[ - ] VicariousJambi 12 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 10:15:59 ago (+13/-1)

dead internet theory

[ + ] knightwarrior41

[ - ] knightwarrior41 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 19:50:56 ago (+1/-0)

just do a search and will see that the numbers differs from actual search results

the page might tell you that there are millions of websites for any topic and yet you can only advance to page 9 or 10 if lucky

[ + ] Clubberlang

[ - ] Clubberlang 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 21:52:11 ago (+1/-0)

Replacement Net Theory

[ - ] didyouknow 7 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 12:26:14 ago (+7/-0)

Don't fall for this scoundrels tricks because his intention is to make digital ID an integral part of twitter and thus to a wider extension to other social media platform under the guise of combating 'bots'. Mr. Free speech wants to play his part in removing anonymity from the internet. Did you guys expect anything else from a (((billionaire)))?

https://files.catbox.moe/dp8qql.png

[ + ] yesiknow

[ - ] yesiknow 4 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 12:44:44 ago (+4/-0)

The dick made his money on tax subsidies as part of the gobalist's thieving con aginast the tax payers.

[ + ] TheYiddler

[ - ] TheYiddler 4 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 13:02:06 ago (+4/-0)

Owning twitter is another play to get state funds. They will pay handsomely to control narratives. And the "under new management" just might fool people.

[ + ] ThisGuy

[ - ] ThisGuy 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 12:50:35 ago (+1/-0)

Now kiss.

[ + ] GhostCow

[ - ] GhostCow 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 15:30:00 ago (+2/-0)

He specifically said that tweet wasn't about any kind of digital id and that he will balance things so that people can still be anon

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 4 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 12:10:45 ago (+4/-0)

If 90% are bots, the other 10% are probably mostly people manually shilling their products and services. The number of regular people tweeting their political bullshit, or bitching about their sorry lives, is probably a tiny fraction of accounts.

I don't know a single person in real life who uses Twitter. Facebook, Instagram, Tik Tok, Youtube, Telegram, yes, but no one on Twitter.

[ + ] yesiknow

[ - ] yesiknow 3 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 12:41:31 ago (+3/-0)

The globalist's owned political agencies use it. The British and Canadian police that are bought use it to intimidate citizens because what they're saying isn't technically legal in their countries. The US politicos have the Smith Mundt propaganda revision act that allows them to propagandize their own people. Canada and Britain don't want their own social media companies because of that and they don't want people going to agency web sites they pay for

Messenger was started by a Klaus Schwab cult nut and they're slowly moving over to that.

[ - ] Qwertytoal 3 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 15:51:08 ago (+3/-0)

Ill share this about "woke" and strongly liberal accounts on reddit.
Each time Ive looked up accounts I had 'flagged' during the fake election, and returned to review its user posting history, practically every single account had seized posting original content or replies or comments around end up January. Every time.

[ - ] deleted 3 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 10:48:46 ago (+4/-1)

deleted

[ + ] Hadza

[ - ] Hadza 0 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 13:39:13 ago (+0/-0)

You could write the whole thing off on him being mad about them

[ - ] Boardallday3 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 17:03:45 ago (+2/-0)

Same with reddit. People are stupid as fuck now, and machine learning has advanced enough that they have bots that reply almost like they are actual people, at least enough to be believable on a screen. They are not, and sentient AI is something I truly believe is impossible, or practically impossible/way beyond our capabilities and understanding. We are no closer to understanding what consciousness is than people were 100,000 years ago

[ - ] HeavyBeefCurtains 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 13:41:54 ago (+2/-0)

nooo you can't say that that is antisemitic!

[ - ] v0atmage 2 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 10:17:29 ago (+2/-0)

The sample size is 100? Give me a break, that is way lower than it should be.

[ + ] Master_Foo

[ - ] Master_Foo 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 16:36:40 ago (+1/-0)

No, that's about the size you want it to be if you purposefully want an inaccurate statistical analysis.

The big question is, how many times did they poll a random 100 member user base to get a result they wanted?

[ - ] Lordbananafist 1 point 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 13:44:29 ago (+1/-0)

most of you sons of bitches are robots

[ - ] kammmmak 0 points 3 yearsMay 16, 2022 11:09:42 ago (+0/-0)

Talk about getting screwed over

Sign into an existing account