☰
×
Login Register an account
Top Submissions Explore Upgoat Search Random Subverse Random Post Colorize! Site Rules Donate
41

Honest Reporter Sheryl Atkinson: "FBI tried to Plant Child Porn on my Husbands Computer."

submitted by beece to LyingNewsMedia 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 11:56:24 ago (+42/-1)     (citizenfreepress.com)

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/sharyl-attkisson-fbi-intended-to-plant-child-porn-on-my-husbands-computer/



Anyone not following this saga, in 2013 she noticed that her computer had been moved. Inside of her home. She took it to a computer expert who determined that "someone" had illegally installed some real stolen top secret files. She reported it to the authorities and the story died there. Then she started legal action against the Obama justice dept. Narrowed it down to (((Rod Rosenstein))). More Fucking criminal actions by the federal government it appears.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/sharyl-attkisson-sues-administration-over-computer-hacking

https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/03/sharyl-attkisson-statement-on-government-computer-intrusion-court-decision/

More background https://heavy.com/news/2018/05/lisa-barsoomian-rod-rosenstein-wife-spouse/




33 comments block

sort by: hot new top old low

[ - ] PostWallHelena 9 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 12:22:04 ago (+9/-0)

I have seen her site before and liked her, but I never knew anything about this court case. Thanks.

[ - ] AngryWhiteKeyboardWarrior 5 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 12:47:17 ago (+5/-0)

I'm not convinced they'd have to break into someone's home to plant shit on the computer. Seems like they could get a warrant on some kind of lame probable cause excuse, have the computers seized, and then plant whatever they want on it.

Assuming it even needs to be planted at all. Who does the checking to prove it's there, where it came from, and how it got there? Does the judge and/or jury see any of that info and evidence? How would anyone ever know the truth of any of it?

Also it's a great excuse for an actual pedo to make to explain getting caught with cheese pizza. "I said/wrote some shit the government didn't like, now they're framing me with CP."

[ - ] heebiejeebies 2 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 13:08:04 ago (+2/-0)

Frankly, planting CP on someone's computer seems like more work than just accusing them of domestic terrorism and detaining them indefinitely with no due process.

Not saying it doesn't happen because it seriously looks like they did that to Bruce Paddock (brother of supposed vegas shooter) to shut him up when he was trying to blow open their false flag.

But in the age of the patriot act, it is way more "sensible" for ZOG to throw terrorism charges at people and disappear them than go through with a public CP court case.

[ - ] Fishsticksforever 6 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 14:40:26 ago (+6/-0)

Unless the goal is to tarnish their reputation and therefore influence, rather than indefinite incarceration which may create a martyr of them.

[ - ] heebiejeebies 6 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:09:16 ago (+7/-1)

I thought about that after I posted. It would absolutely be useful for blackmail/coercion purposes. Not to say the threat of indefinite detainment isn't coercive, but something like CP would make you a pariah to your friends and loved ones. No chance at becoming a martyr when you're smeared as a pedophile.

Take voat for a good example. Certain users have very effectively created chaos and uncertainty here by engaging in hysterical smear tactics against "high-profile" members like blumen. Shit, I've already been accused of being a pedophile sympathizer by several members just for making devil's advocate remarks speaking out against the accusations or for making posts they don't like.

[ - ] Trumpman1488 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 16:18:10 ago (+1/-0)

Blueman does post fucked up pedoish posts though.

[ - ] heebiejeebies 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 21:07:43 ago (+0/-0)

Is it "pedoish" or actually child pornography? I'd argue the posts in question are absolutely distasteful but that they do not depict minors sexually. Frankly, they appear more occult than anything to me. I'm not willing to accuse a man of something as grotesque and malevolent and life-altering as a pedophile over his posts. It's not beyond shadow of a doubt for me. Sorry if that offends the purity squad here at voat.

That it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer, is a Maxim that has been long and generally approved.

-Benjamin Franklin, letter to Benjamin Vaughan, March 14, 1785.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:32:32 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 20:39:57 ago (+0/-0)

Unwarranted self importance is bitch mentality

Nothing you said or did online made one fucks worth of difference

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 21:49:37 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 13, 2022 07:48:10 ago (+0/-0)

Uncool butthurt youre displaying bitch

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 13, 2022 15:00:07 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:54:10 ago (+1/-0)

If many cops are dirty in the FBI then they might not all have the same methods. This agent learns how to frame people with CP, that director knows how to write of vague yet actionable claims of being a domestic terrorism threat. Framing isn't going to look the same every time.

[ - ] FellowWhite 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 18:06:21 ago (+0/-0)

It's not being a dirty cop if you're working on behalf of the state and doing things mostly above the table. Is it even illegal to plant illegal materials?

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 21:23:17 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] FellowWhite 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 21:31:55 ago (+0/-0)

It seems odd to me that anyone at the lower ranks would be willing to break a law and risk prison unless blackmailed or threatened(which is probably the stanadard), especially knowing they'd be the fall guy, likewise it also seems odd that there would be laws preventing the organizations such as the police and FBI from working at full efficiency by limiting what they can do to ensure a conviction. It's not like anybody would even do anything regardless how much power the state gives itself, and it would give the rank and file the confidence they need to actually do their jobs properly.

[ - ] Paradoxical003 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 16:24:11 ago (+1/-0)

Terrorism charges produces martyrs. Terrorism charges require more work to setvup and justify. It's far easier to plant cp, or just claim someone has it on their computers, it's also easier to get a major sentence for a fake cp charge than on a fake charge of domestic terror activity.

For many good reasons, the feds would prefer to frame a guy for looking at kiddy porn than to frame them for anti government activities.

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:11:42 ago (+1/-0)*

deleted

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:53:12 ago (+0/-0)

How are you actually going to prove what bytes were altered when?

[ - ] x0x7 2 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 16:01:17 ago (+2/-0)

You can't. The directory listing of the file has that kind of meta data but that meta data itself can be altered and bits can be altered without effecting the meta data. Everything that exists on a disk is a mere suggestion of what happened. But that's why they use "experts" to give testimony such as "in my experience in the field when that field is modified in the directory it reflects the real time of change." But that doesn't mean it has to be the case but toss an expert on something and a probably, assuming no foul play, becomes a definitely with no further questions.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 16:06:00 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 17:00:39 ago (+0/-0)

I see how a court would buy that, but you realize the MFT is just another bit of data you can choose to overwrite or not, yes?

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 17:29:21 ago (+0/-0)*

deleted

[ - ] FellowWhite 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 18:04:36 ago (+0/-0)

They could just send it remotely, then get a warrant knowing that you have it.

Also it's a great excuse for an actual pedo to make to explain getting caught with cheese pizza. "I said/wrote some shit the government didn't like, now they're framing me with CP."

I'd rather let some actual pedophiles caught with cp get off scot free rather than giving every asshole the ability to turn you into a criminal without any action on the part of the guy who is committing the crime.

[ - ] bonghits4jeebus 2 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:50:25 ago (+2/-0)

I've said it before, but I don't care what the FBI "finds" on someone's computer. hang the actual pedos. Arrangements of bytes don't bother me.

[ - ] 1Icemonkey 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:17:51 ago (+1/-0)

Can’t you load something onto a computer from far away?

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:35:51 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] deleted 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 15:42:23 ago (+1/-0)

deleted

[ - ] FellowWhite 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 18:13:51 ago (+0/-0)

You don't need full access to the machine, just an Email or even a text message would be enough if the service it's going through keeps records of what's sent and received then it will be possible to see that the images were at one point being possessed by the owner of the hardware. The jury won't care if it was blatantly planted, the only care if it was possessed.

[ - ] deleted 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 19:12:16 ago (+0/-0)

deleted

[ - ] x0x7 1 point 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 16:05:08 ago (+1/-0)

Yes. Pegasus can crack into almost any phone. From there putting an exploit that infects a desktop if they are ever dumb enough to plug their phone into their computer is possible. A variant of stuxnet is pretty much guaranteed to be able to do that step.

They also have their own official hacking software besides those used for "remote observation" but we have observed them using it to modify files before.

[ - ] dassar 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 16:41:36 ago (+0/-0)

'The department has steadfastly denied any involvement in the hacking, saying in a 2013 statement: "To our knowledge, the Justice Department has never compromised Ms. Attkisson's computers, or otherwise sought any information from or concerning any telephone, computer, or other media device she may own or use."

So in truth, they are saying they have no idea if the Dept was involved or not.
Nor do they deny a that a Third party IT contractor may have performed the work for the Dept either.
Joo semantics. Just so tiresome.

[ - ] NorthAmericanPorchMonkey 0 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 20:35:03 ago (+0/-0)

This is why you don't use proprietary garbage like Windows or Mac.

[ - ] thebearfromstartrack4 -1 points 3.0 yearsMay 12, 2022 14:13:47 ago (+0/-1)

Every time I hear (read?) her name I think Cleryl Asskitten (on the job).