I chimed in on this the last time it was suggested, and I think it's a very bad idea. It will have a chilling effect on how users upvote and downvote. I don't want MY OPINION of the worth of someone else's comment being made public.
If this happens, I won't upvote or downvote anything ever again.
This is Poal level faggotry. Please don't do this.
I always thought it would be a good feature on voat.co and someone brought it up recently. To be honest I don't really care either way, I am just trying to get back in the swing of things working on the site and this one wouldn't be too hard to implement.
Is there something wrong with the upvote/downvote system as it is? If not, why fix what isn't broken. On top of that, Poal did this, so it's probably a bad idea.
What would even be the upside to being able to see who downvoted you? Considering retards here have the maturity of teenage girls I can only see this adding unnecessary drama, which we already have more than enough of.
But seriously, you say you thought it would be a good feature. I'm genuinely curious why? Because I can see no upside.
Users shouldn't be dictated to what is deemed acceptable behaviour.
The premise is voter transparency and accountability. The reality is reducing forum engagement and activity by minimising user anonyminity.
The positive is we can see all the losers downvoting every post we make, the negative is that it's probably an alt and disposable and doesn't do anything to solve the situation of subversives with alt accounts.
That would certainly make things interesting. I don't think it's a good idea to make it so people are worried about downvoating though, and what about people who lurk and vote but would prefer not to get drawn into the pissing contest that never seems to end?
Silly argument. Nobody would take that scenario seriously.
Now, if you and another account downvote the same things with 99% accuracy.. over hundreds of downvotes.. do you really think this scenario is realistically likely?
Making a one sentence comment isn't doing anything "hard" at all, let alone strawmanning. What I said was not an argument, but simply an observation. This site is full of schizos, and it's a safe bet the quickest way to end up on their respective shit lists is to downvote them. Introduce this feature and people will think twice about downvoting someone, because that person might be a nut and target them for vengeance. If the downvote button were to count as speech, this feature would suppress that speech. Therefore it's a bad idea. At least if the site stands for free speech.
I would say the fact that you added some caveat to my scenario that would excuse its use for targeting people as acceptable (99% accurate?) would tend to prove it's a very bad idea. What if two unrelated people of roughly the same life experience and ideology sat on all/new and downvoted roughly the same thing every day? Would their responses to obvious bait and trolls in the form of downvoting that nonsense not easily get them branded as alts?
I like the option to read through an argument, upvote the person I agree with and downvote the one I hate, and not get dragged any further into anyone's web pissing match. You're welcome to try and sway my opinion with an actual argument, if you think this feature would serve the site well. To me it just seems like it would cause more problems.
I just want to know what the benefit of this feature would be. What would be good about knowing who downvotes us? I couldn't tell you the last time I looked at a downvote and cared who gave it to me. Who is getting downvoted so much that they have to wonder or even care where the votes come from? This reeks as an idea by one of the screeching tards who are always whining to system about this or that petty squabble. There's literally nothing it could be used for other than revenge.
I've read through this whole thread and the ONLY positive I've seen that makes sense to me is that it would expose, if not end, downvote brigading. I'm not convinced at all that that positive outweighs all the negatives to me.
Once again, I thought old voat had this issue figured out pretty nicely. The only thing we're missing here is just the numbers of people we had on old voat. It was never perfect, and never would be, but the systems we had in place there seemed to work fine enough for what we were all there to do: engage in free speech and stop the suppression of it.
This is just my observation, but it seems like the % of old voat that spent their time figuring out was JDIF and who was legit and calling each other feds made up 10% of old voat but 50% here. They serve a purpose, but it's a different one than mine and most other people.
Most places on the internet suffer from having to many people, but I think this place is suffering from not having enough, and the fact that about half the people that half the people here are what I'll call "the shitposting brigade" is probably what's keeping the high quality content posters away.
I would argue that downvote brigading is not enough of a concern on a small site like this, certainly not enough to sacrifice anonymity. The people pushing for this aren't having important threads or must-see comments buried. They're just getting their little feelings hurt and are now chopping at the bit to get some revenge. I'd like to see several examples of good content that got hidden by a "brigade." There would need to be hundreds of instances of it happening for there to even be a ghost of a justification for this.
I read downthread that system thinks the main squabbles of this will carry out over PM. How can he be so naïve? I will tell you exactly what's going to happen: Someone will get downvoted, then go and downvote rape the person who did it, and the victim will come screaming to the admin to have these bad downvotes wiped. Get ready for dozens of ping threads and people crying because "so and so downvoted me, he's clearly a shill."
Right, I asked system somewhere in the thread what exactly is so wrong with things here as it is? Then I went on to say basically what you just said. I will admit that I CAN see how it could have positive effects with voting, but even that's not a give and to me it doesn't outweigh the obvious negatives that would come with such a change, like things you just described.
Having said all that...I just find the push for this to be very inorganic. I'm here a lot and involved with the community here decently even off this site. I've never heard anyone ask for this, let alone a ton of people. It's odd.
Uhh I would say nay on that. Sounds like a fine way to stir up drama and anon votes has its merits. The intent behind making them visible could also be avoided by just making alts too. I could go either way really. A person should ideally be unashamed of their stance.
Prepare for an influx of spamniggers, the return of @Try and @Joe_McCathy, several more goats will likely leave, and most importantly...lots and lots of drama.
The voting system is more an easy way of keeping the spergs in line. Best example is joe, people downvote his porn posts, and then he leaves for a good few months to go bother other sites.
Hes been on an internet point tirade all night, well before this post. Its funny to me how this topic is being brought up and not a number of other ones.
This is probably the singular biggest way to improve Voat's user participation, because it disincentivizes the faggots who abuse downvotes to run people off the site entirely.
[ - ] dwb3 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:26:34 ago (+2/-1)
Personally i dont mind. I wouldnt mind saying ive downvoated blumen like 5 times tonight and hes probably butthurt and for some reason an entire post had been made because of it.
If internet points don't matter, then neither does upvotes or downvotes....all of which I am in total agreement with. 'Gold' didn't mean shit to me way back when on reddit, nor does ego strokes or birdies here.
If diggernicks doesn't like it, I immediately like it. He's a old crotchety salty boomer faggot who probably has some alts himself.
Even if diggernicks didn't like it, it would solve multiple problems currently preventing the growth of this site - for example, targetted downvoating would immediately be visible for the entire community to see. The community could self police, since nobody would have to take anyone elses word for it and would be able to quantify it with their own eyes. Sure, this will cause some short-term drama, but when the dust settles it would (probably) improve the content and behavior simultaneously.
People who abuse alts would, subsequently, be much easier to identify by the community.
I could go on, but the reality is downvotes being visible (AKA voting transparency from OG voat that was suggested but never got implemented) would allow the community to self-police and would disincentivize bad actors.
In general, the people who dislike this idea are the bad actors. I've never heard a single solid good argument against this idea.
I do believe in transparency, so maybe I over re-acted. This does have potential merit after thinking it over.
My initial reaction was based upon the petty shit that goes on here, and believing that it will be a nightmare cat fight for all the faggots that are dopamined up enough to fucking even give a flying horseshit about a "vote".
[ - ]system[op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:35:37 ago (+2/-1)
It will create it's own problems sure, but I imagine people mainly dishing it out in PMs.. with maybe a thread here or there which gets downvoted to hell because those types of threads always do.
Nope. Problem is the people spamming bullshit and having an agenda don't go around upvoting and downvoting anyways. They only spam their bad actor ideas constantly and you allow it. You allow people like dangus to spam violent videos of people attacking women and allow him to spam how he wants to kill all women in the chatroom. Then you ban the people who bring it up by claiming they are spamming.
DANGUS made threats against women on this site and said he wants to kill them. Yet he still spams the frontpage using his alts.
Look at his upvotes, who is upvoting him, look into those people and what they post. Find the pattern. ALTS
It's the upvotes of these "people" you should look into.
I rarely downvote, as I prefer stinging commentary (and the ensuing butthurt), but I got no problem with my downvote activity showing. I would not be amused to see the downvote going the way of Poal....one of the few things I think sucks with that site.
[ + ] account deleted by user
[ - ] account deleted by user 0 points 2 yearsMay 6, 2022 21:44:53 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HughBriss
[ - ] HughBriss 8 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:59:49 ago (+8/-0)*
If this happens, I won't upvote or downvote anything ever again.
This is Poal level faggotry. Please don't do this.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 8 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:32:32 ago (+9/-1)
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:38:56 ago (+5/-2)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity 5 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 08:10:09 ago (+6/-1)
What would even be the upside to being able to see who downvoted you? Considering retards here have the maturity of teenage girls I can only see this adding unnecessary drama, which we already have more than enough of.
But seriously, you say you thought it would be a good feature. I'm genuinely curious why? Because I can see no upside.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 10:25:54 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] RomeoCasanova
[ - ] RomeoCasanova 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:53:34 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:56:25 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] UncleDoug
[ - ] UncleDoug 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:06:03 ago (+2/-1)
Users shouldn't be dictated to what is deemed acceptable behaviour.
The premise is voter transparency and accountability. The reality is reducing forum engagement and activity by minimising user anonyminity.
The positive is we can see all the losers downvoting every post we make, the negative is that it's probably an alt and disposable and doesn't do anything to solve the situation of subversives with alt accounts.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:22:08 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted -1 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 10:22:39 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 3 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 10:27:14 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 7 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:58:48 ago (+7/-0)
[ + ] PeckerwoodPerry
[ - ] PeckerwoodPerry 6 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:36:20 ago (+7/-1)
[ + ] SmokeyMeadow
[ - ] SmokeyMeadow 4 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:27:42 ago (+4/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:30:53 ago (+1/-2)
Now, if you and another account downvote the same things with 99% accuracy.. over hundreds of downvotes.. do you really think this scenario is realistically likely?
You're strawmanning hard, man.
[ + ] SmokeyMeadow
[ - ] SmokeyMeadow 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:26:20 ago (+4/-1)
I would say the fact that you added some caveat to my scenario that would excuse its use for targeting people as acceptable (99% accurate?) would tend to prove it's a very bad idea. What if two unrelated people of roughly the same life experience and ideology sat on all/new and downvoted roughly the same thing every day? Would their responses to obvious bait and trolls in the form of downvoting that nonsense not easily get them branded as alts?
I like the option to read through an argument, upvote the person I agree with and downvote the one I hate, and not get dragged any further into anyone's web pissing match. You're welcome to try and sway my opinion with an actual argument, if you think this feature would serve the site well. To me it just seems like it would cause more problems.
[ + ] Fascinus
[ - ] Fascinus 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:44:33 ago (+3/-0)
― Oscar Wilde
[ + ] SmokeyMeadow
[ - ] SmokeyMeadow 3 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 08:11:30 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity -1 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 14:15:48 ago (+0/-1)
Once again, I thought old voat had this issue figured out pretty nicely. The only thing we're missing here is just the numbers of people we had on old voat. It was never perfect, and never would be, but the systems we had in place there seemed to work fine enough for what we were all there to do: engage in free speech and stop the suppression of it.
This is just my observation, but it seems like the % of old voat that spent their time figuring out was JDIF and who was legit and calling each other feds made up 10% of old voat but 50% here. They serve a purpose, but it's a different one than mine and most other people.
Most places on the internet suffer from having to many people, but I think this place is suffering from not having enough, and the fact that about half the people that half the people here are what I'll call "the shitposting brigade" is probably what's keeping the high quality content posters away.
[ + ] SmokeyMeadow
[ - ] SmokeyMeadow 0 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 16:16:30 ago (+0/-0)
I read downthread that system thinks the main squabbles of this will carry out over PM. How can he be so naïve? I will tell you exactly what's going to happen: Someone will get downvoted, then go and downvote rape the person who did it, and the victim will come screaming to the admin to have these bad downvotes wiped. Get ready for dozens of ping threads and people crying because "so and so downvoted me, he's clearly a shill."
Fuck this idea.
[ + ] we_kill_creativity
[ - ] we_kill_creativity 0 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 18:13:20 ago (+0/-0)
Having said all that...I just find the push for this to be very inorganic. I'm here a lot and involved with the community here decently even off this site. I've never heard anyone ask for this, let alone a ton of people. It's odd.
[ + ]deleted
[ - ] deleted 2 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 10:20:47 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:34:51 ago (+3/-0)
The intent behind making them visible could also be avoided by just making alts too.
I could go either way really. A person should ideally be unashamed of their stance.
[ + ] RomeoCasanova
[ - ] RomeoCasanova 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:32:47 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] Master_Foo
[ - ] Master_Foo 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:06:39 ago (+3/-0)
[ + ] NationalSocialism
[ - ] NationalSocialism 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:15:31 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:21:09 ago (+4/-1)
It's much harder to run your sockpuppets, alt voting brigades, forum sliding campaigns, etc.. if people can observe downvote behavior.
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:14:13 ago (+0/-2)
It works great on Poal.
It would create a lot of frustration for the subversive bad actors on Voat.
Absolutely make downvotes visible for all if you wish to see this space change it's trajectory from circling the drain.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 7 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:19:54 ago (+7/-0)
Nigger
You best be joking
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:21:57 ago (+0/-3)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:23:28 ago (+2/-0)
Now thats entertainment!
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:35:46 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:41:51 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:51:42 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:54:51 ago (+0/-0)
The world may never know.
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:56:30 ago (+0/-0)
Have it your way.
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 00:27:52 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] PostWallHelena
[ - ] PostWallHelena 1 point 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 00:47:54 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus 0 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 00:55:25 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Redhairin
[ - ] Redhairin 1 point 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 23:44:31 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 3 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:05:26 ago (+3/-0)
Only homosexual niggers seek adulation from random strangers online
Get back to reddit where you belong
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:08:41 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 6 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:10:37 ago (+6/-0)
Kind of degenerate
Isn't watching two teams compete on a level playing field exciting enough?
They had to add wagering shekels to pump it up?
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:12:32 ago (+3/-2)
[ + ] s23erdctfvyg
[ - ] s23erdctfvyg 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:00:58 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:12:20 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:14:52 ago (+1/-0)
Force of nature!
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:19:00 ago (+0/-1)
Not haha funny either.
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:21:19 ago (+2/-1)
Like what
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:22:31 ago (+2/-0)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:24:34 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:24:01 ago (+0/-2)
This is probably the singular biggest way to improve Voat's user participation, because it disincentivizes the faggots who abuse downvotes to run people off the site entirely.
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:26:34 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:28:24 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:31:05 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:33:04 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:34:42 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:36:15 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] Redhairin
[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 23:39:59 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 0 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 23:44:10 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] HowDoYouDoFellowNiggers
[ - ] HowDoYouDoFellowNiggers 1 point 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 13:38:24 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:11:18 ago (+3/-1)*
Even if diggernicks didn't like it, it would solve multiple problems currently preventing the growth of this site - for example, targetted downvoating would immediately be visible for the entire community to see. The community could self police, since nobody would have to take anyone elses word for it and would be able to quantify it with their own eyes. Sure, this will cause some short-term drama, but when the dust settles it would (probably) improve the content and behavior simultaneously.
People who abuse alts would, subsequently, be much easier to identify by the community.
I could go on, but the reality is downvotes being visible (AKA voting transparency from OG voat that was suggested but never got implemented) would allow the community to self-police and would disincentivize bad actors.
In general, the people who dislike this idea are the bad actors. I've never heard a single solid good argument against this idea.
In short.. do it.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 4 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:21:33 ago (+4/-0)
You fags get your panties all twisted into knots whenever multiple people disagree with you
Grow up and stop taking the internet so serious
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:29:27 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 4 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:31:32 ago (+4/-0)
Have you thought about using your skills of deduction as a private investigator or perhaps police detective?
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:32:26 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:35:36 ago (+2/-0)
If you demented tinfoil hatters ridiculous conspiracy theories get disproved youll just move on to being paranoid about something else.
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:37:02 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:38:17 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] rage
[ - ] rage 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:40:24 ago (+0/-0)
But you're still a complete moron.
Kind of funny, actually.
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:43:23 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] ParnellsUprising
[ - ] ParnellsUprising 2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:06:11 ago (+3/-1)
Is that your JIDF showing?
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 5 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:10:00 ago (+5/-0)
I mentioned in the OP it wasn't my idea.
How does that make sense? I already have the power to look at votes, I am asking how you feel about you having that power.
[ + ] ParnellsUprising
[ - ] ParnellsUprising 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:29:19 ago (+0/-0)
I do believe in transparency, so maybe I over
re-acted. This does have potential merit after thinking it over.
My initial reaction was based upon the petty shit that goes on here, and believing that it will be a nightmare cat fight for all the faggots that are dopamined up enough to fucking even give a flying horseshit about a "vote".
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:35:37 ago (+2/-1)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:39:53 ago (+1/-1)
[ + ] oldblo
[ - ] oldblo 0 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:37:15 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:00:49 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] diggernicks
[ - ] diggernicks 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:07:02 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:09:39 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] Monica
[ - ] Monica 0 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 12:46:33 ago (+0/-0)
DANGUS made threats against women on this site and said he wants to kill them. Yet he still spams the frontpage using his alts.
Look at his upvotes, who is upvoting him, look into those people and what they post. Find the pattern. ALTS
It's the upvotes of these "people" you should look into.
[ + ] observation1
[ - ] observation1 1 point 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 09:51:12 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] v0atmage
[ - ] v0atmage 1 point 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 01:01:29 ago (+1/-0)
I personally don't think it will prove that useful one way or another.
[ + ] Cantaloupe
[ - ] Cantaloupe 1 point 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:25:36 ago (+2/-1)
Perhaps it can show manipulation.
[ + ] Redhairin
[ - ] Redhairin 0 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 23:30:48 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 14:22:01 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] system
[ - ] system [op] 1 point 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 14:40:44 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] dwb3
[ - ] dwb3 -1 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 14:42:42 ago (+0/-1)
[ + ] deleted
[ - ] deleted 0 points 2 yearsMay 1, 2022 14:39:43 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] gaybeeye
[ - ] gaybeeye 0 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 09:18:24 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] big_fat_dangus
[ - ] big_fat_dangus -1 points 2 yearsApr 30, 2022 00:29:11 ago (+1/-2)
[ + ] PhimoticEmbrace
[ - ] PhimoticEmbrace -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 23:40:39 ago (+0/-2)
[ + ] TheBigGuyFromQueens
[ - ] TheBigGuyFromQueens -2 points 2 yearsApr 29, 2022 22:36:31 ago (+1/-3)