The article is an interesting paraphrasing of economic history but the assertion at the beginning basically strips it of all credibility:
On the contrary, the Russian and Chinese leaders envisage a multipolar world in which each could have different ambitions. Nothing would push them to go to war.
Nobody in their right mind could believe something that retarded. There will be no "multipolar" world with "different ambitions." You would have to be a newborn suckling babe to even think for one second that is possible.
Currently, Russia and China's ambition thrusts them into cooperativity because that ambition is to free themselves from a Western dominated system. As soon as they do that they will turn on each other. You're a fucking retard if you believe otherwise. Resources are limited, and access to those resources even more so. You're telling me fighting over resources and territory will stop just because Washington isn't bossing people around anymore? Whoever wrote this is a fucking child, probably a first year philosophy major at some faggot art college.
Code word for "we intend for these two countries to be under our kike control and therefore they would never go to war because we will be using this part of the world from now on as our sphere of influence.
We are not only journalists, but also and above all committed citizens who defend the United Nations Charter and the 10 principles enunciated by the Non-Aligned Movement in Bandung.
Makes perfect sense, but not in the way this writer imagines. He acts as if the rest of the world are free agents. Nothing could further from the truth. They are at least as entangled in the spider's web as is the West. I would term the article, "Blue smoke and mirrors."
[ + ] dalai_llama
[ - ] dalai_llama 1 point 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 13:07:41 ago (+1/-0)
Nobody in their right mind could believe something that retarded. There will be no "multipolar" world with "different ambitions." You would have to be a newborn suckling babe to even think for one second that is possible.
Currently, Russia and China's ambition thrusts them into cooperativity because that ambition is to free themselves from a Western dominated system. As soon as they do that they will turn on each other. You're a fucking retard if you believe otherwise. Resources are limited, and access to those resources even more so. You're telling me fighting over resources and territory will stop just because Washington isn't bossing people around anymore? Whoever wrote this is a fucking child, probably a first year philosophy major at some faggot art college.
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 1 point 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 15:56:57 ago (+1/-0)
"different ambitions"
Code word for "we intend for these two countries to be under our kike control and therefore they would never go to war because we will be using this part of the world from now on as our sphere of influence.
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 1 point 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 09:02:48 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] FalseRealityCheck
[ - ] FalseRealityCheck 0 points 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 09:38:55 ago (+0/-0)
[ + ] Reawakened
[ - ] Reawakened 1 point 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 09:56:07 ago (+1/-0)
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 15:54:31 ago (+0/-0)
Funny how a couple of words is all it takes to take chutzpah from 100% truth huh?
[ + ] AugustineOfHippo2
[ - ] AugustineOfHippo2 0 points 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 11:33:48 ago (+0/-0)
WTH is "international law"? they are implying that there is some governing body above all countries that we all must obey. total B.S.
[ + ] AryanPrime
[ - ] AryanPrime 0 points 2 yearsApr 27, 2022 15:56:09 ago (+0/-0)
the 1949 UN Resolution on Genocide is one such law...by definitions laid out in that law, kikes are openly promoting White genocide in America
If you were so inclinced as an American citizen you could take action using that law.